Venlafaxine in the treatment of dysthymia: an open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of antidepressant medications in the treatment of dysthymia, or chronic mild depression. Venlafaxine blocks reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine and may produce a more complete antidepressant response than do single-mechanism selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The purpose of this open-label study was to provide preliminary data on the tolerability and effectiveness of venlafaxine for patients with dysthymia. METHOD: Twenty-two dysthymic subjects (DSM-III-R criteria) were enrolled in this 10-week, open-label trial, and 5 dropped out prior to their second visit. Seventeen subjects (77.3%) received more than 1 week of medication. RESULTS: Of these 17 subjects, 13 (76.5%) were treatment responders. Results of paired sample t tests were highly significant, indicating that, on average, there was significant improvement on all measures of symptomatology and functioning, with mean +/- SD scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression decreasing from 20.95 +/- 6.50 at baseline to 6.06 +/- 5.49 at week 10. The mean +/- SD final dose was 178.68 +/- 70.80 mg/day. Side effects were reported by 17 (85%) of the 20 subjects for whom tolerability was assessed (the most common were fatigue, dry mouth, and nausea); 5 (22.7%) of 22 patients discontinued treatment because of side effects, primarily nausea (N = 3). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the benefit of venlafaxine in the treatment of chronic depression and the need for more rigorous studies.

Early identification of treatment failures in short-term psychotherapy. An assessment of therapeutic alliance and interpersonal behavior.

Early sessions of patients categorized as dropouts (n = 25), good outcome (n = 28), and poor outcome (n = 20) completers of a 40-session protocol of short-term psychotherapy were compared to determine predictive validity of in-session measures of therapeutic alliance and interpersonal behavior (Working Alliance Inventory, Session Evaluation Questionnaire, and Interpersonal Adjective Scale). A number of significant differences were found among the three groups: both patients and therapists in the dropout group rated the relationship as more problematic than those in the good outcome group, and patients in the dropout group also rated the relationship as more problematic than those in the poor outcome group, while therapists' ratings did not distinguish dropouts from poor outcome. Differences between good and poor outcome groups were nonsignificant. These findings have clinical significance, particularly in early identification of patients at risk for treatment failure.