Pulmonary coccidioidomycosis mimicking malignancy associated with Sweet's syndrome (acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis).

A suspicious malignant lung nodule with cutaneous reaction is not always cancer, especially in low risk for malignancy patients. A lung biopsy should be taken into consideration. The associated cause of Sweet's syndrome directs the treatment in each patient.

Quantitative Analysis of Clot Deposition on Extracorporeal Life Support Membrane Oxygenators Using Digital and Scanning Electron Microscopy Imaging Techniques.

Device-induced thrombosis remains a major complication of extracorporeal life support (ECLS). To more thoroughly understand how blood components interact with the artificial surfaces of ECLS circuit components, assessment of clot deposition on these surfaces following clinical use is urgently needed. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which produces high-resolution images at nanoscale level, allows visualization and characterization of thrombotic deposits on ECLS circuitry. However, methodologies to increase the quantifiability of SEM analysis of ECLS circuit components have yet to be applied clinically. To address these issues, we developed a protocol to quantify clot deposition on ECLS membrane oxygenator gas transfer fiber sheets through digital and SEM imaging techniques. In this study, ECLS membrane oxygenator fiber sheets were obtained, fixed, and imaged after use. Following a standardized process, the percentage of clot deposition on both digital images and SEM images was quantified using ImageJ through blind reviews. The interrater reliability of quantitative analysis among reviewers was evaluated. Although this protocol focused on the analysis of ECLS membrane oxygenators, it is also adaptable to other components of the ECLS circuits such as catheters and tubing. Key features • Quantitative analysis of clot deposition using digital and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques • High-resolution images at nanoscale level • Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) devices • Membrane oxygenators • Blood-contacting surfaces Graphical overview.

Analysis of online materials regarding DIEP and TRAM flap autologous breast reconstruction.

Online resources have become a mainstay for health information, and it is vital that such resources maintain accessible literacy levels to empower informed decision making. Previous studies have shown that the online resources regarding post-mastectomy breast reconstruction are of low readability; however, none have evaluated specific online resources regarding the most common procedures within autologous breast reconstruction, limiting analysis to the results of generic searches. This study sought to discover the readability of online, patient-directed resources regarding the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) and Transverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle (TRAM) flaps, the most utilized autologous flaps in breast reconstruction, using health literacy analysis. We hypothesized that the online materials regarding DIEP and TRAM flaps would yield literacy scores above the 6th-grade reading level, as recommended by the American Medical Association, despite previous literature and readability recommendations. Google searches for "DIEP breast reconstruction" and "TRAM breast reconstruction" were conducted. All patient-directed, non-sponsored websites found within the first three pages of the search underwent analysis using a variety of readability formulae. Both DIEP and TRAM resources were well above the 6th-grade reading level according to every metric used, and there was no significant difference in the reading level between the two procedures. Based on these results, significant work was needed to simplify the online resources to be more understandable for patients; these authors propose one method for such. In addition, the low readability of online resources suggests added emphasis on the need for surgeons to ensure that patients understand the medical information discussed during the presurgical consultations.

Synergistic Use of Novel Technological Advances in Burn Care Significantly Reduces Hospital Length of Stay Below Predicted: A Case Series.

Length of stay is an important metric in healthcare systems, primarily because it reflects the cost of care provided. In the United States, as in many countries, inpatient hospital stays are significantly more expensive than outpatient care across all healthcare conditions,1 so earlier discharge and transition to outpatient care is crucial to help control the ever-increasing cost of healthcare. In burn patients, length of stay has traditionally been estimated at 1 day per 1% total body surface area of burn. This estimation was first described in a round table discussion in 1986.2 However, since that time there has been significant evolution in the quality of care available to burn patients, in both the operating room and ICU. The use of new harvesting techniques, synthetic dermal substitution, and autologous epidermal skin cell suspension are allowing large, deep burns to be excised and covered in much quicker time frames than historically were possible. Examples include the skin harvesting and wound debridement device for grafting and excision, biodegradable temporizing matrix as a fully synthetic dermal template, and regenerative epidermal suspension concerning cell harvesting. Although these modalities can all be used separately, we believe that using them in conjunction has allowed us to shorten the length of stay in patients with severe partial and full-thickness burns. We present an initial case series of three patients with anticipated hospital lengths of stay of 54.5, 55, and 51 days, who were ready for discharge in 37, 35, and 43 days, respectively.

Analysis of the Utility of CO2 and Pulse-Dye Lasers Together and Separately in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Burn Scars.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertrophic burn scars (HTBSs) remain a significant source of morbidity. Contemporary treatment has evolved to use CO2 lasers and/or pulse-dye lasers (PDLs) to reduce scar thickness (ST) and erythema. This study seeks to compare treatment efficacy with CO2 or PDL individually and in combination. METHODS: Patients undergoing laser treatments for HTBSs were enrolled. Three 3 × 3 cm squares of HTBSs were randomized to receive treatment with CO2 laser, PDL or CO2 + PDL. Patients underwent 3 treatments, 4 to 6 weeks apart and were followed up over 3 to 6 months. Scar assessments occurred at each visit before treatment and consisted of photographs, ultrasound, colorimetry, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Score. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Twenty completed 2 treatments (80%) and 11 completed all 3 treatments (44%). Median initial ST was 0.3 cm. Median time since injury was 8 months. Hypertrophic burn scars treated with CO2 or PDL showed a significant decrease in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score from visit 1 to 3 (P = 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). When separated by ST, thick scars (≥0.3 cm) showed a significant decrease in thickness between visit 1 and 2 using all laser modalities (CO2 + PDL, P = 0.01; CO2, P = 0.02; PDL, P = 0.03). Thin scars (<0.3 cm) showed a reduction in thickness by visit 3 after CO2 + PDL or PDL alone (P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). Separating scars by age, younger scars (<9 months) showed a significant reduction in thickness between visit 1 and 2 for CO2 treatment (P = 0.04), and between visit 2 and 3 for CO2 + PDL treatment (P = 0.04). Hypertrophic burn scars treated with PDL did not demonstrate a significant reduction in thickness until visit 3 (P = 0.002). Older scars (≥9 months) showed a significant reduction in thickness between visit 1 and 2 only after CO2 + PDL (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hypertrophic burn scars of varying ages, etiologies, and thicknesses were examined in this study with greater degree of early reduction seen in thicker scars using all laser modalities of CO2, PDL or in combination. However, there was no clinically meaningful benefit found with combination as compared with individual treatment. These data support the use of laser to improve HTBS but does not support one modality or combination of modalities over another.

Fractionated Ablative Carbon Dioxide Laser Therapy Decreases Ultrasound Thickness of Hypertrophic Burn Scar: A Prospective Process Improvement Initiative.

INTRODUCTION: Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment is routinely used to treat hypertrophic burn scars (HBS). Although prior research has documented subjective improvement in HBS after treatment, there is little data evaluating objective changes in scar characteristics after therapy. The aim of our process improvement project was to evaluate changes to scar thickness (ST) using high-frequency ultrasound in patients with HBS undergoing CO2 laser therapy. METHODS: Ultrasound measurements of ST were obtained from patients with HBS before initial and at each subsequent treatment. ST, reduction in ST per treatment, and percentage reduction in ST from baseline were tabulated. Post hoc analyses examining the effect of initial ST and scar maturity on outcome were performed. First, patients were grouped by baseline ST into thicker (group 1, initial ST ≥ median value) and thinner (group 2, initial ST < median value) scar groups. Second, patients were divided into quartiles based on time from injury to treatment. Outcomes at each time point were compared with either Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests, with Bonferonni corrections performed for post hoc subgroup analyses. Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with HBS treated with CO2 laser were included. All patients completed 1 or more treatment, 48% completed 2 or more treatments, and 28% completed 3 treatments. Median initial ST was 0.71 cm (0.44-0.98 cm), and median scar maturity was 7.5 months (4.9-9.8 months). Overall, ST decreased over the treatment course (P < 0.001), with post hoc analysis demonstrating that 2 treatments were required to achieve a significant ST reduction (P < 0.01). On subgroup analysis comparing initial ST, ST decreased significantly in group 1 (thicker scars) overall (P < 0.001) but not in group 2 (P = 0.109). ST reduction was greatest after 1 treatment in group 1 (P = 0.022) and group 2 (P = 0.061). Percent reduction was greater in group 1 relative to group 2 after 1 treatment (P = 0.016). On subgroup analysis of scar maturity, there were no significant differences in either baseline ST or ST at any subsequent visit. CONCLUSIONS: Fractionated ablative CO2 laser treatment improved ST after 1 to 2 treatments. Patients with thicker scars demonstrated greater ST reduction than those with thinner scars. Ultrasound adequately assessed treatment response.