Simulated and community-based instruction involving persons with mild and moderate mental retardation.

In this study of simulated instruction and/or community training of four functional living tasks was compared across groups of adolescents and young adults with mild and moderate retardation. Forty individuals participated in the assessment and training activities of this study, including 20 participants with mild retardation and 20 individuals with moderate retardation. A mixed factorial design was used to evaluate differences associated with level of mental retardation, simulated versus community-based instruction, and assessments in school and community settings. Participants with mild retardation performed better than their counterparts with moderate retardation on the simulated tasks and in the community settings. Participants with mild retardation were more successful in generalizing from the simulated instructional experiences to the community settings than were their counterparts with moderate retardation. However, in many of the situations, community training was sufficiently powerful to eliminate any advantage associated with some of the participants having experienced prior simulated instruction. Results are discussed in relation to the need to more closely examine the design and delivery of functional living skills instruction involving individuals with different levels of mental retardation. Specifically, the effectiveness of instructional simulations for teaching functional living skills does not appear to be uniform across level of retardation and targeted tasks. The highest priority question no longer appears to be whether or not simulated versus community-based instruction is more efficacious. Future research might more productively focus on the quality of different instructional simulations in combination with community assessment and/or training opportunities for teaching functional living skills to persons who experience different levels of mental retardation.

The effectiveness of three sets of school-based instructional materials and community training on the acquisition and generalization of community laundry skills by students with severe handicaps.

This study examined the effectiveness of three sets of school-based instructional materials and community training on acquisition and generalization of a community laundry skill by nine students with severe handicaps. School-based instruction involved artificial materials (pictures), simulated materials (cardboard replica of a community washing machine), and natural materials (modified home model washing machine). Generalization assessments were conducted at two different community laundromats, on two machines represented fully by the school-based instructional materials and two machines not represented fully by these materials. After three phases of school-based instruction, the students were provided ten community training trials in one laundromat setting and a final assessment was conducted in both the trained and untrained community settings. A multiple probe design across students was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the three types of school instruction and community training. After systematic training, most of the students increased their laundry performance with all three sets of school-based materials; however, generalization of these acquired skills was limited in the two community settings. Direct training in one of the community settings resulted in more efficient acquisition of the laundry skills and enhanced generalization to the untrained laundromat setting for most of the students. Results of this study are discussed in regard to the issue of school versus community-based instruction and recommendations are made for future research in this area.