Transforming Nursing Education: Developing Augmented Reality Procedural Training.

The shortage of nursing faculty and the scarcity of clinical placements have compelled researchers to investigate innovative solutions for procedural development to bridge the gap between didactic teaching and clinical experiences. This feasibility study uses augmented reality (AR) with Microsoft HoloLens2 and Dynamics 365 Guides to train graduate nursing students on advanced nursing procedures, focusing on lumbar puncture. A convenience sample of 24 nurse practitioner students participated in the study. The System Usability Scale, Acceptability Scale, and Engagement Scale were used to assess participant's experiences and perceptions. The results are positive for the feasibility and acceptance of AR technology for procedural training. Participants found the HoloLens2 device easy to use and showed confidence in its functionality. The step-by-step instructions provided by Microsoft 365 Guides were understandable, useful, and satisfactory. The students reported high levels of engagement and found the AR experience to be helpful and motivating for learning. Faculty time was significantly reduced using the HoloLens2 for procedural training compared to traditional methods. This study demonstrates the potential for AR as an effective and efficient modality for nursing education. The findings support the integration of AR technology to enhance procedural development, address the challenges of limited clinical sites, and provide students with an immersive and self-paced learning experience. Additional studies will need to explore the impact of AR on clinical competency, patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Overall, the use of AR technology may be useful and effective for nursing pedagogy.

Using Simulation to Teach Transitions of Care for Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Understanding and facilitating the seamless and safe transitions of patients across high-acuity hospital settings are important for students to grasp in order to meet patient and family care needs. PROBLEM: Clinical placements do not always give students the opportunity to care for patients in various hospital settings or apply complex knowledge and skills learned in their didactic courses. Furthermore, the global pandemic has limited student clinical experiences in health care settings, underscoring the need for simulated clinical learning opportunities. APPROACH: A multiscenario simulation using a high-fidelity human patient simulation manikin was incorporated into a senior-level capstone course. Simulated hospital settings included the (1) emergency department, (2) critical care unit, and (3) progressive care unit. OUTCOME: Student evaluations revealed positive perceptions of learning, enhanced proficiency of clinical skills, and increased confidence regarding transitions of care. Faculty held agreeable opinions of the simulation's ease of facilitation and effectiveness as a teaching tool. CONCLUSION: Application of complex knowledge and skills, understanding the use of bundles of care, and an appreciation for transitions of care hospitalized patients were successfully achieved.

The Effect of RN Circulator-Scrub Person Dyad Consistency on Total OR Time and Turnover Time.

Operating room efficiency is an important consideration for perioperative nurse leaders because it can affect their facilities' revenue and provider and patient satisfaction. Using consistent perioperative teams, including the same RN circulator and scrub person, for consecutive procedures may improve OR efficiency. This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study assessed the effects of a consistent team in the form of RN circulator-scrub person dyads on the total OR and turnover times for 310 surgical procedures using electronic OR records data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program that was collected in 2008. Controlling for relevant variables (eg, procedure type consistency, number of staff members present, procedure complexity), the association between RN circulator-scrub person dyads and total OR time and turnover time was not significant.

Development and testing of a self-regulation model for recurrent depression.

Self-regulation is a strategy for self-management of depression. Study aims were to (1) describe development of an intervention based on metacognition and self-regulation, (2) test intervention feasibility and utility, and (3) determine its effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms. The Self-Regulated Illness Management of Depression intervention was developed and taught to 22 participants with recurrent depression. There was no attrition 6 months post intervention. At 6 months, there was a significant decrease in depressive symptoms (M = 10.21, standard deviation = 8.0), t(18) = 5.60, p < .001, and 73 percent of participants used Self-Regulated Illness Management of Depression frequently. Results indicated that Self-Regulated Illness Management of Depression was feasible and useful.

Testing the relationship between a self-management intervention for recurrent depression and health outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a leading cause of disability globally. It is a recurrent chronic illness that affects over three million people worldwide. Self-management has been found to positively impact depression outcomes but few techniques or interventions are theory-based and can be used either with or without the support of mental health care providers. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to test the relationship between a self-management intervention called the Self-Regulated Illness Management of Depression (SRIM-D) intervention and specific health outcomes (depression, self-efficacy, social support and quality of life). SRIM-D was developed using metacognition and self-regulation theories. SAMPLE AND SETTING: Twenty-three individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) participated in the study. Individuals over 21 years of age without a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, current substance abuse problem or suicidal ideations who suffered from MDD (BDI-II < 19) were considered for the study. METHODS: The intervention was delivered over three consecutive weeks of 1 ½â€¯hour sessions by two PhD prepared nurses with psychiatric experience. Participants were given a workbook manual with corresponding power point presentations conferring information about depression, and were led through a series of workbook activities designed to teach the self-regulation process as applied to their recurrent depression. Health outcomes were assessed via self-report survey prior to and six-month post-intervention. RESULTS: Six months post-intervention depressive symptoms decreased significantly (M = 6.62, SD = 14.76, t(15) = 5.60, p < .0001). Self-efficacy (M = 161.67, SD = 25.27); t(20) = -2.89, p < .01) and quality of life (13.25, SD = 3.61; t(19) = 2.62, p > .01) both improved significantly. Social support had a negligible, insignificant decrease from pre-intervention (M = 53.05, SD = 19.81) to six months post-intervention (M = 42.14, SD = 19.53). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the SRIM-D intervention improved health outcomes in this study. The intervention demonstrated applicability to people with recurrent, chronic depression who might or might not have access to care.

Assessing Cognitive Representations of Antidepressants: Development and Validation of the Attitudes Toward Medication-Depression Inventory.

Antidepressant drugs represent the mainstay of treatment for depression; however, nonadherence is a major problem. Attitudes are predictors of long-term adherence and drive medication use. The Attitudes Toward Medication-Depression (ATM-D) Inventory was developed and tested with 131 patients in primary care settings who reported a diagnosis of depression. Content validity was assessed by experts with a 94.4% agreement on item relevancy. Exploratory factor analysis showed three factors (course of medication treatment, identity, and control) that accounted for 57% of the total variance in the final 17-item scale. The instrument demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (α = .76-.84) and test-retest reliability (α = .74-.83). Results support the construct validity and reliability of the instrument and revealed unique insights into patients' cognitive representations of their antidepressants. This study supported that patients have cognitive representations related to depression and antidepressants that go beyond simple concerns about the effects of the medication.