Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim ; 50(2): 86-93, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35544246

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Gliderite®, one of the first stylets designed specifically to assist tracheal intubation with non-channeled curved blades video laryngoscopes, can cause injury. The S-Guide® is a new, malleable, intubating guide allowing oxygenation. Its soft tip is designed to prevent trauma. We aimed to compare the duration of tracheal intubation with S-Guide compared to Gliderite using a C-MAC® D-Blade® video laryngoscope in patients with simulated difficult airways. METHODS: We performed a single-blinded prospective randomized study, with 50 adult patients requiring orotracheal intubation under general anaestheesia in Lausanne University Hospital. A cervical collar was fitted around the patient's neck to simulate difficult intubation conditions. Exclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) >3, BMI > 35 kg m2 , known or at risk of difficult intubation, and risk of aspiration of gastric content. We recorded T1: time of identification of the glottis; T2: time to inflate the cuff, and T3: total intubation time (capnography curve appearance). Secondary outcomes were the presence of arytenoid contact during intubation and postoperative airway discomfort. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between T1 and T2 (seconds) while using the S-Guide or Gliderite, respectively: 14.6 [9.6- 18.6] vs 16.5 [11.0-20.6]; P=.368 and 43.3 [33.2-49.3] vs 46.3 [35.6-61.5], P =.308. T3 was significantly shorter in the S-Guide group: 58.1 [50.2-61.8] vs 65.3 [57.6-78.7], P =.044. Fewer arytenoid contact occurred during intubation using the S-Guide (P =.032), without difference in postoperative airway discomfort. CONCLUSION: S-Guide-assisted tracheal intubation, with a C-MAC D-Blade in simulated difficult airways, allows successful and faster intubation than with the Gliderite Stylet.

2.
Am J Sports Med ; 45(3): 578-583, 2017 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27836905

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) is an effective analgesic treatment after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction but may result in transient femoral nerve injuries and quadriceps muscle weakness, which in turn contribute to worsened functional outcomes. PURPOSE: To compare electrophysiological criteria of a femoral nerve injury as well as functional and pain-related outcomes after ACL reconstruction when analgesia was provided by a CFNB or intravenous patient-controlled analgesic of morphine (IV PCA). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A total of 74 patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction were randomized to receive a CFNB before surgery, followed by a ropivacaine infusion for 2 days and oxycodone, or IV PCA. The primary outcome was the rate of femoral nerve injuries at 4 weeks postoperatively, defined as a reduction of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) area from the vastus medialis muscle after supramaximal femoral nerve stimulation at the groin, associated with an absent H-reflex of the femoral nerve and signs of vastus medialis muscle denervation. Secondary functional outcomes were quadriceps muscle strength, active flexion range, and distance walked, as measured on postoperative days 1 and 2. Secondary pain-related outcomes were IV morphine consumption and pain scores at rest and on movement in phase 1 recovery and on postoperative days 1 and 2. RESULTS: No patients met the electrophysiological criteria of a femoral nerve injury. The mean CMAP area at 4 weeks was equivalent in both the CFNB and IV PCA groups (47 ± 16 mV·ms and 51 ± 13 mV·ms, respectively; P = .50). While no differences were detected in functional outcomes or pain scores, the consumption of an IV morphine equivalent was reduced by the administration of a CFNB in phase 1 recovery (6 ± 5 mg and 13 ± 7 mg, respectively; P = .0003), on postoperative day 1 (6 ± 7 mg and 19 ± 17 mg, respectively; P = .0005), and on postoperative day 2 (11 ± 10 mg and 19 ± 17 mg, respectively; P = .03) compared with an IV PCA. CONCLUSION: Despite prior contrary reports, a CFNB did not result in femoral nerve injuries or worsened functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. The improvement of analgesia with a CFNB was only marginal and not clinically relevant beyond 24 hours. Registration: NCT01321138 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).


Assuntos
Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Nervo Femoral/lesões , Neuropatia Femoral/fisiopatologia , Bloqueio Nervoso , Dor/fisiopatologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/efeitos adversos , Fenômenos Eletrofisiológicos , Feminino , Nervo Femoral/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Método Simples-Cego , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Clin Anesth ; 32: 54-8, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27290945

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Measure the displacements of endotracheal tube (ETT) tip displacement during head and neck movements. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Ear-nose-throat (ENT) and neurosurgery operating room. PATIENTS: We performed a maximal head-neck movement trial on 50 adult patients, American Society of Anaesthesiologists 1 or 2. Patients with body mass index >35 kg · m(-2), height <150 cm, airway malformations, pulmonary diseases, difficulties in neck flexion or extension, previous ENT surgery or radiotherapy, gastroesophageal reflux, or dental instability were excluded from the study. INTERVENTIONS: ENT and neurosurgery. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the change in distance between the ETT tip and the carina, using a fiberscope through the ETT. RESULTS: After intubation, a wide disparity of tube tip distance to the carina in the neutral position was noted with a median of 5.0 (3.5-7.0) cm. Cephalad tube movement was documented following maximal head and neck extension in 34 (68%) patients and right head rotation in 25 patients (50%). Caudal tube displacement was due to maximal head and neck flexion in 38 patients (76%) and left head rotation in 25 patients (50%). Selective right main bronchus intubation was noted in 2 (4%) patients after maximal head extension. CONCLUSION: Maximal head and neck movements led to unpredictable tube displacements. Proper reassessment of tube positioning after head and neck movement of intubated patients is therefore mandatory.


Assuntos
Movimentos da Cabeça , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Posicionamento do Paciente/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Movimento , Pescoço , Postura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...