RESUMO
PIP: The advent of the development gap between the industrialized countries and the underdeveloped countries is explored through an examination of early attempts to industrialize in Latin America and the Middle East in the years 1770-1870. The beginning of the development gap can be dated to 1830-60, with the diffusion of the industrial revolution in Western Europe and the US. The periphery remained poorly defined and still enjoyed a significant degree of economic autonomy through 1870, but lowered cost of international freight, the increasing cost and technological complexity of machinery,and other factors after that date combined to assure increasing economic integration of nations. Latin America and the Middle East were selected for study because they were the only present-day developing regions to have developed modern industry before 1850-60 except for Bengal, which was already colonized by the British. The industrial revolution was a decisive development in the history of human societies, marked by a drastic acceleration of the rate of economic growth as much as by an unprecedented increase in inequality of development between countries. Societies bypassed by technological innovations thus seemed doomed sooner or later to depend on societies at the center of development. Third world contemporaries of the early industrial revolution appear to have been aware of this, and some peripheral states made serious efforts to avoid the worst forms of external dependence and to resist the deindustrialization, pauperization, and direct colonization of underdevelopment. 3 types of attempts at industrialization in Latin America and the Middle East before 1860-80 are distinguished and described, including partial and unsuccessful public efforts in several countries, isolated private initiatives going against prevailing trends in Mexico and Brazil, and industrial development directed step by step by the state in Egypt and Paraguay. It is argued that the model of industrialization in Egypt and Paraguay anticipated the Japanese experience in certain respects and would have had a good chance of success hand not devastating warfare destroyed the economics of both countries. The author explores 5 questions to assess the relevance of the Paraguayan and Egyptian model: 1) whether the natural environment of the 2 countries offered favorable conditions for modern factories, 2) whether peripheral states had the resources for financing a true industrialization policy, 3) whether the sociocultural context of the 2 countries would have permitted them to develop an industrial culture, 4) whether the West would have tolerated the competition implied by their economic development and industrialization, and 5) whether this model of industrialization was adjusted to the specific conditions of the periphery.^ieng