Methamphetamine use is associated with increased hospital resource consumption among minimally injured trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical effects of methamphetamines (MA) may complicate medical management, potentially increasing resource utilization and hospital costs out of proportion to the patient's severity of injury. We hypothesize that minimally injured (MI) patients testing positive for MA consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. METHODS: Adult trauma patients were identified from 4 years of registry data, which was linked to cost data from our center's financial department. Patients were classified as MI (Injury Severity Score <9) or severely injured (Injury Severity Score >9). Primary outcome was total direct costs for the inpatient hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included direct costs by cost center, contribution margin, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent (n = 6,193) of the 10,663 adult patients during the study period were admitted with MI. Nine percent (n = 557) of those tested were positive for MA. Total direct costs were higher in MI MA patients compared to nonusers ($2,998 vs. $2,667, p < 0.001), and users consumed more resources in all 10 cost centers. The same multivariate model showed marginally increased costs with MI alcohol users, but not with MI cocaine users or severely injured MA users. CONCLUSION: MI MA patients consume more resources than patients testing negative for MA. Although MA use complicates the initial evaluation of patients, resource consumption was increased for all cost centers representing the entirety of a patients hospital stay, suggesting that the influence of MA is not limited to the initial diagnostic workup. Centers with high proportions of MA users may realize significant losses if compensation contracts are inadequate.

Transfusion practices for acute traumatic brain injury: a survey of physicians at US trauma centers.

PURPOSE: To determine whether physician specialty influences transfusion threshold in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: We surveyed transfusion preferences of chiefs of trauma surgery, chairs of neurosurgery, and surgical and neurosurgical ICU directors at all 187 US Level I trauma centers using a scenario-based, multiple-choice instrument administered by mail. We evaluated the hemoglobin value used as a transfusion threshold for patients with severe acute TBI in several scenarios as well as opinions regarding the rationale for transfusion. RESULTS: The response rate was 58% (312/534). Mean time in practice was 17 +/- 8 years and 65% were board certified in critical care. Neurosurgeons (NS) used a greater mean hemoglobin threshold for transfusion of TBI patients than trauma surgeons (TS) and non-surgeon intensivists (CC) whether the intracranial pressure was normal (8.3 +/- 1.2, 7.5 +/- 1.0, and 7.5 +/- 0.8 g/dL; NS, TS, and CC, respectively, P < 0.001) or elevated (8.9 +/- 1.1, 8.0 +/- 1.1, and 8.4 +/- 1.1 g/dL; NS, TS, and CC, respectively, P < 0.001). All three groups commonly believed that secondary ischemic injury is an important problem following TBI (74, 66, and 63%, P = 0.32), but fewer NS believed that transfusions have important immunodulatory effects (25, 91, and 83%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgeons prefer more liberal transfusion of TBI patients than TS and CC, suggesting that actual practice may depend largely on which specialist is primarily managing care. The observed clinical equipoise would justify a randomized trial of liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in patients with TBI.

Dextran polymer hemostatic dressing improves survival in liver injury model.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in early hemorrhage control could result in more favorable outcomes. Several advanced hemostatic dressings are available; however, none meets the ideal characteristics defined by the United States Army. We studied the effects of a new dextran polymer hemostatic dressing on survival, blood loss, and blood pressure in a swine model of severe liver injury. METHODS: We randomized 12 Yorkshire swine to treatment with either standard laparotomy pads or laparotomy pads coated with a dextran polymer (Bloxx). These dressings are visually identical, and investigators were not informed of the dressing assignment. We transected the left medial lobe of the liver in the anesthetized swine with a large knife, applied dressings immediately, and held pressure for 7 min. The animals received a weight-based maintenance crystalloid infusion without further resuscitation. Endpoints were blood loss, blood pressure, early mortality (120 min), and tissue histology. RESULTS: Baseline and pre-injury characteristics were similar between all animals. Three of six animals in the control group survived for 2 h while all six animals treated with Bloxx survived (P=0.05). Similarly, animals in the Bloxx group experienced less blood loss (10.4+/-8.8 mL/kg versus 28.3+/-13.0 mL/kg, P=0.025) and higher post-injury blood pressure than the control group. Bloxx was not associated with macroscopic or microscopic tissue damage. CONCLUSIONS: Bloxx is superior to standard laparotomy sponges in this model of lethal liver injury. Further study of this dressing is warranted to determine its potential for use in civilian and military trauma.

Safety of early mobilization of patients with blunt solid organ injuries.

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons believe that early mobilization of patients with blunt solid organ injuries increases the risk of delayed hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an association between the day of mobilization and rates of delayed hemorrhage from blunt solid organ injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association of mobilization with delayed hemorrhage of a solid organ requiring laparotomy. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Adults with blunt renal, hepatic, or splenic injuries were identified from a trauma registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical records were used to determine the day of mobilization and to identify patients with delayed hemorrhage requiring laparotomy. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-four patients with blunt solid organ injuries were admitted to the hospital for nonoperative management. Failure rates of nonoperative management were 4.0%, 1.0%, and 7.1% for renal, hepatic, and splenic injuries, respectively. No patients with renal or hepatic injuries failed secondary to delayed hemorrhage. Ten patients (5.5%) with splenic injuries failed secondary to delayed hemorrhage. Eighty-four percent of patients with renal injuries, 80% with hepatic injuries, and 77% with splenic injuries were mobilized within 72 hours of admission. Day of mobilization was not associated with delayed splenic rupture in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: The timing of mobilization of patients with blunt solid organ injuries does not seem to contribute to delayed hemorrhage requiring laparotomy. Protocols incorporating periods of strict bed rest are unnecessary.

Testing for substance use in trauma patients: are we doing enough?

HYPOTHESIS: Only a fraction of trauma patients are being tested for substance use, and the proportion of those tested may have decreased over time. DESIGN: Retrospective review of longitudinal data. SETTING: National Trauma Data Bank. PATIENTS: Individuals aged 15 to 50 years admitted with injuries from 1998 to 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes of interest are the incidence of drug and alcohol testing and the results of these tests. The primary exposure of interest is year of admission. RESULTS: Half of patients admitted with injuries are being tested for alcohol use, and half of these patients have positive test results. Only 36.3% of patients admitted with injuries are tested for drug use, and 46.5% of these patients have positive test results. There have been no significant trends for either alcohol testing or results in the past 6 years. Compared with 1998, patients are significantly less likely to be tested for drugs, but more likely to have positive test results. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small proportion of patients who are admitted with injuries are tested for substance use. The proportion of patients tested for drugs has decreased significantly during the past 6 years. Routine testing would maximize identification of patients who may benefit from interventions. Several obstacles exist to routine screening, including legal and physician-related barriers. Future efforts to facilitate routine testing of trauma patients for substance use should concentrate on protecting patient confidentiality and educating physicians on the techniques and benefits of brief interventions.

Appearance of solid organ injury with contrast-enhanced sonography in blunt abdominal trauma: preliminary experience.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the detection rate of injury and characterize imaging findings of contrast-enhanced sonography and non-contrast-enhanced sonography in the setting of confirmed solid organ injury. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective study involved identifying hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries on contrast-enhanced CT. After injury identification, both non-contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography were performed to identify the possible injury and to analyze the appearance of the injury. The sonographic appearance of hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries was then analyzed, and the conspicuity of the injuries was graded on a scale from 0 (nonvisualization) to 3 (high visualization). RESULTS: Non-contrast-enhanced sonography revealed 11 (50%) of 22 injuries, whereas contrast-enhanced sonography depicted 20 (91%) of 22 injuries. The average grade for conspicuity of injuries was increased from 0.67 to 2.33 for spleen injuries and from 1.0 to 2.2 for liver injuries comparing non-contrast-enhanced with contrast-enhanced sonography, respectively, on a scale from 0, being nonvisualization, to 3, being high visualization. The splenic injuries appeared hypoechoic with occasional areas of normal enhancing splenic tissue within the laceration with contrast-enhanced sonography. Different patterns were observed in liver injuries including a central hypoechoic region. In some liver injuries there was a surrounding hyperechoic region. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced sonography greatly enhances visualization of liver and spleen injuries compared with non-contrast-enhanced sonography. Solid organ injuries usually appeared hypoechoic on contrast-enhanced sonography, but often a hyperechoic region surrounding the injury also was identified with liver injuries.

The fast is positive, now what? Derivation of a clinical decision rule to determine the need for therapeutic laparotomy in adults with blunt torso trauma and a positive trauma ultrasound.

INTRODUCTION: The object of this study was to derive a clinical decision rule for therapeutic laparotomy among adult blunt trauma patients with a positive abdominal ultrasound for trauma (FAST) examination. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the trauma registry and medical records of all critical trauma patients who underwent a FAST examination in the emergency department (ED) in a university Level I trauma center over a 3-year period. Blunt trauma patients aged >16 years who had a positive FAST examination (defined as the presence of intraperitoneal fluid) were eligible. We selected seven clinical and ultrasound variables available during ED resuscitation for analysis: age, presence of an episode of hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 torr in the ED), presence of abdominal tenderness, chest injury, pelvic fracture, femur fracture, and FAST fluid location (right upper quadrant [RUQ] only; RUQ plus other location; other location only). The primary outcome variable was whether a laparotomy was performed and whether this laparotomy was needed to provide the definitive surgical intervention ("therapeutic laparotomy"). We analyzed the variables using binary recursive partitioning analysis to create a decision rule. RESULTS: There were 2336 FAST examinations performed during the study period, resulting in 230 (9.8%) positive examinations in patients meeting inclusion criteria. There were 135 patients who had therapeutic laparotomies and 95 who did not need laparotomy. The groups were similar in baseline characteristics. In the recursive partitioning analysis, the first node in the decision tree was the presence of fluid in the RUQ. Of the 144 patients with RUQ fluid, 105 (73%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 64%-80%) required therapeutic laparotomy. Of the 86 patients without RUQ fluid, 30 (35%, 95% CI 25%-46%) nevertheless required therapeutic laparotomies, and the variables blood pressure, femur fracture, abdominal tenderness, and age further divided these patient into high- and low-risk groups. Of the 12 patients without RUQ fluid who had normal blood pressures, no femur fractures, no abdominal tenderness, and were aged 60 years and younger, none (95% CI 0%-22%) required therapeutic laparotomy. In conclusion, given a positive FAST examination, the presence of fluid in the RUQ is an important predictor of the need for therapeutic laparotomy. CONCLUSION: In the absence of fluid in the RUQ, there are other clinical variables that may allow for the development of a clinical decision rule regarding the need for therapeutic laparotomy.

Femur fractures and lung complications: a prospective randomized study of reaming.

Reaming the intramedullary canal during fixation of femoral shaft fractures may contribute to pulmonary morbidity in patients with trauma. The purpose of our study was to compare acute and late pulmonary complications after reamed or nonreamed nailing of femur fractures. Patients who had femoral shaft fractures were randomized prospectively to a reamed (n = 41) or nonreamed (n = 41) femoral nailing group. Arterial blood gases were measured before and after femur fixation. Ratios of PaO2/FiO2 and alveolar arterial gradients were calculated. Pulmonary complications (acute respiratory distress syndrome) (ARDS), pneumonia, and respiratory failure) were monitored. Age, gender, fracture site, fracture type, time to nailing, length of operation, Injury Severity Score, and Abbreviated Injury Scale-thorax were similar for the two groups. No significant differences were observed in the ratio of PaO2/FiO2 ratios or alveolar arterial (A-a) gradients before and after nailing. The overall incidence of pulmonary complications was 14.6% (eight patients who had reamed nailing and four patients who had nonreamed nailing), and given the sample size, definitive conclusions could not be reached because of inadequate statistical power. We were unable to document differences in pulmonary physiologic response or clinical outcome between patients having reamed and nonreamed femoral nailing. This study may serve as a pilot investigation for other clinical investigations.

Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in blunt trauma patients with out-of-hospital or emergency department hypotension.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We determine the test performance of abdominal ultrasonography for detecting hemoperitoneum in blunt trauma patients with out-of-hospital or emergency department (ED) hypotension. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all blunt trauma patients hospitalized at a Level I trauma center. Patients were included if they were older than 6 years and had out-of-hospital or ED hypotension (systolic blood pressure < or =90 mm Hg) and underwent ED ultrasonography. The initial interpretation of the abdominal ultrasonography was recorded, including the presence or absence of intraperitoneal fluid and the specific location of such fluid. Presence or absence of intra-abdominal injury was determined by abdominal computed tomography scan, laparotomy, or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-seven patients with a mean age of 36.0+/-17.5 years were enrolled. One hundred forty-eight (33%) patients had intra-abdominal injuries, and 116 (78%) of these patients had hemoperitoneum. Abdominal ultrasonography had the following test performance for detecting patients with intra-abdominal injury and hemoperitoneum: sensitivity 92/116 (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 71% to 86%), specificity 316/331 (95%; 95% CI 93% to 97%), positive predictive value 92/107 (86%; 95% CI 78% to 92%), and negative predictive value 316/340 (93%; 95% CI 90% to 95%). The positive likelihood ratio was 15.8, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.22. One hundred five (91%) of the 116 patients with intra-abdominal injuries and hemoperitoneum underwent a therapeutic laparotomy. Abdominal ultrasonography demonstrated intraperitoneal fluid in 87 (sensitivity 83%; 95% CI 74% to 90%) of these 105 patients. CONCLUSION: Of patients with out-of-hospital or ED hypotension, abdominal ultrasonography identifies most patients with hemoperitoneum and intra-abdominal injuries. Hypotensive patients with negative abdominal ultrasonography results, however, must be further evaluated for sources of their hypotension, including additional abdominal evaluation, once they are hemodynamically stabilized.

Trauma and emergency surgery: an evolutionary direction for trauma surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The success of nonoperative management of injuries has diminished the operative experience of trauma surgeons. To enhance operative experience, our trauma surgeons began caring for all general surgery emergencies. Our objective was to characterize and compare the experience of our trauma surgeons with that of our general surgeons. METHODS: We reviewed records to determine case diversity, complexity, time of operation, need for intensive care unit care, and payor mix for patients treated by the trauma and emergency surgery (TES) surgeons and elective practice general surgery (ELEC) surgeons over a 1-year period. RESULTS: TES and ELEC surgeons performed 253 +/- 83 and 234 +/- 40 operations per surgeon, respectively (p = 0.59). TES surgeons admitted more patients and performed more after-hours operations than their ELEC colleagues. Both groups had a mix of cases that was diverse and complex. CONCLUSION: Combining the care of patients with trauma and general surgery emergencies resulted in a breadth and scope of practice for TES surgeons that compared well with that of ELEC surgeons.

Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning.

BACKGROUND: Performance review using videotapes is a strategy employed to improve future performance. We postulated that videotape review of trauma resuscitations would improve compliance with a treatment algorithm. METHODS: Trauma resuscitations were taped and reviewed during a 6-month period. For 3 months, team members were given verbal feedback regarding performance. During the next 3 months, new teams attended videotape reviews of their performance. Data on targeted behaviors were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Behavior did not change after 3 months of verbal feedback; however, behavior improved after 1 month of videotape feedback (P <0.05) and total time to disposition was reduced by 50% (P <0.01). This response was sustained for the remainder of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Videotape review can be an important learning tool as it was more effective than verbal feedback in achieving behavioral changes and algorithm compliance. Videotape review can be an important quality assurance adjunct, as improved algorithm compliance should be associated with improved patient care.

Does tachycardia correlate with hypotension after trauma?

BACKGROUND: Tachycardia is believed to be closely associated with hypotension and is often listed as an important sign in the initial diagnosis of hemorrhagic shock, but the correlation between heart rate and hypotension remains unproved. STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected from all trauma patients, 16 to 49 years old, presenting to our university-based trauma center between July 1988 and January 1997. Moribund patients with a systolic blood pressure < or =50 or heart rate < or = 40 and patients with significant head or spinal cord injuries were excluded. Tachycardia was defined as a heart rate >or= 90 and hypotension as a systolic blood pressure < 90. RESULTS: Hypotension was present in 489 of the 14,325 admitted patients that met the entry criteria. Of the hypotensive patients, 35% (169) were not tachycardic. Tachycardia was present in 39% of patients with systolic blood pressure 120 mmHg. Hypotensive patients with tachycardia had a higher mortality (15%) compared with hypotensive patients who were not tachycardic (2%, P = 0.003). Logistic regression analysis revealed tachycardia to be independently associated with hypotension (p = 0.0004), but receiver operating curve analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of heart rate for predicting hypotension is poor. CONCLUSIONS: Tachycardia is not a reliable sign of hypotension after trauma. Although tachycardia was independently associated with hypotension, its sensitivity and specificity limit its usefulness in the initial evaluation of trauma victims. Absence of tachycardia should not reassure the clinician about the absence of significant blood loss after trauma. Patients who are both hypotensive and tachycardic have an associated increased mortality and warrant careful evaluation.

Is there a relationship between trauma center volume and mortality?

BACKGROUND: The guidelines for Level I trauma center verification require 1,200 admissions per year. Several studies looking at the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes after injury have reached conflicting conclusions. The goal of our study was to examine the relationship between patient volume and outcomes (mortality and length of hospital stay) in California's trauma centers. METHODS: Data for patients >or= 18 years old admitted after injury (n = 98,245) to a Level I or II trauma center (n = 38) in 1998 and 1999 were obtained from the Patient Discharge Data of the State of California. Hospital volume was derived from the annual number of admissions per center, and covariates including age, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, and trauma center designation were analyzed. RESULTS: Hospital volume was not a significant predictor of death or length of hospital stay. More severely injured patients appeared to have worse outcomes at the highest volume centers. CONCLUSION: In our study, hospital volume was not a good proxy for outcome. Low-volume centers appeared to have outcomes that were comparable to centers with higher volumes. Perhaps institutional outcomes rather than volumes should be used as a criterion for trauma center verification.

Reevaluation of diagnostic procedures for transmediastinal gunshot wounds.

BACKGROUND: Little controversy surrounds the treatment of hemodynamically unstable patients with transmediastinal gunshot wounds (TMGSWs). These patients generally have cardiac or major vascular injuries and require immediate operation. In hemodynamically stable patients, debate surrounds the extent and order of the diagnostic evaluation. These patients can be uninjured, or can have occult vascular, esophageal, or tracheobronchial injuries. Evaluation has traditionally often included angiography, bronchoscopy, esophagoscopy, esophagography, and pericardial evaluation (i.e., pericardial window) for all hemodynamically stable patients with TMGSWs. Expansion of the use of computed tomographic (CT) scanning in penetrating injury led to a modification of our protocol. Currently, our TMGSW evaluation algorithm for stable patients consists of chest radiograph, focused abdominal sonography for trauma, and contrast-enhanced helical CT scan of the chest with directed further evaluation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of contrast-enhanced helical CT scan for evaluating potential mediastinal injuries and to determine whether patients can be simply observed or require further investigational studies. METHODS: Medical records of hemodynamically stable patients admitted with TMGSWs over a 2-year period were reviewed for demographics, mechanism of injury, method of evaluation, operative interventions, injuries, length of stay, and complications. CT scans were considered positive if they contained a mediastinal hematoma or pneumomediastinum, or demonstrated proximity of the missile track to major mediastinal structures. RESULTS: Twenty-two stable patients were studied. CT scans were positive in seven patients. Directed further diagnostic evaluation in those seven patients revealed two patients who required operative intervention. Sixty-eight percent of patients had negative CT scans and were observed in a monitored setting without further evaluation. There were no missed injuries. The hospital charges generated with the CT scan-based protocol are significantly less than with the standard evaluation. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced helical CT scanning is a safe, efficient, and cost-effective diagnostic tool for evaluating hemodynamically stable patients with mediastinal gunshot wounds. Positive CT scan results direct the further evaluation of potentially injured structures. Patients with negative results can safely be observed in a monitored setting without further evaluation.