Comparison of HLA antibody identification methods for the selection of platelet products for HLA-mediated platelet refractory patients.

In an ineffective transfusion context, solid-phase immunoassays using the Luminex platform for the detection and characterization of HLA antibodies are currently used to select HLA-compatible platelet products. A new HLA antibody identification method, the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test (BAG Health care GmbH, Lich, Germany), based on the detection of antibodies directed against a recombinant single antigen (SA) by colored spots detected by HISTO MATCH HLA AB module software, runs fully automated on the MR.SPOT®. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the HISTO SPOT HLA AB and C1qScreen™ (C1q SAB) assays with that of the Labscreen single antigen class I (OL SAB) assay to detect anti-HLA class I antibodies in 56 serum samples from 54 platelet refractory acute myeloid leukemia patients who received HLA mismatch platelet concentrates at a single oncohematology center. In total, 1414 class I specificities, 433 HLA-A and 981 HLA-B, were detected by the OL SAB test. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was >5000 for 874 antigens and <5000 for 655 antigens. The HISTO SPOT® HLA AB and C1q SAB tests identified 85% and 79% of OL SA-detected antigens with an MFI >5000, respectively, but did not identify 34% and 44% of OL SAB-detected antigens, highlighting the lower sensitivity of these techniques. Interestingly, the donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) identified by the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB and C1q SAB assays reacted against HLA mismatch platelet concentrates with the same specificity (86%) and positive predictive (77%) value as in the OL SAB test when the MFI threshold was >2000 for DSA detection. Although the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test is less sensitive than the OL SAB test, this test could be used for the selection of HLA-compatible platelet products.

Low Prevalence of HLA-G Antibodies in Lung Transplant Patients Detected using MAIPA-Adapted Protocol.

Lung transplantation is often complicated by acute and/or chronic rejection leading to graft-function loss. In addition to the HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA), a few autoantibodies are correlated with the occurrence of these complications. Recently, antibodies directed against non-classical HLA molecules, HLA-G, -E, and -F have been detected in autoimmune diseases, like systemic lupus erythematosus. Non-classical HLA molecules are crucial in the immunological acceptance of the lung graft, and some of their isoforms, like HLA-G*01:04 and -G*01:06, are associated with a negative clinical outcome. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of detection of HLA-G antibodies in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and their impact on the occurrence of clinical complications. After incubating the cell lines SPI-801, with and without three different HLA-G isoform expression, with sera from 90 healthy blood donors and 35 LTRs (before and after transplantation), HLA-G reactivity was revealed using reagents from commercial monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigen assay (MAIPA ApDIA®). Only one serum from one blood donor had specific reactivity against the HLA-G transduced lines. Non-specific reactivity in many sera from LTRs was observed with transduced- and wild-type cell lines, which may suggest recognition of an autoantigen expressed by the SPI-801 cell line. In conclusion, this study allowed the development of a specific detection tool for non-denatured HLA-G antibodies. These antibodies seem uncommon, both in healthy subjects and in complicated LTRs. This study should be extended to patients suffering from autoimmune diseases as well as kidney and heart transplant recipients.

Clinical relevance of cell-free DNA quantification and qualification during the first month after lung transplantation.

Background: Many studies have reported the relevance of donor-derived cfDNA (dd-cfDNA) after lung transplantation (LTx) to diagnose and monitor acute rejection (AR) or chronic rejection or infection (INF). However, the analysis of cfDNA fragment size has not been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical relevance of dd-cfDNA and cfDNA size profiles in events (AR and INF) during the first month after LTx. Methods: This prospective, single-center study includes 62 LTx recipients at the Marseille Nord Hospital, France. Total cfDNA quantification was performed by fluorimetry and digital PCR, dd-cfDNA by NGS (AlloSeq cfDNA-CareDX®), and the size profile by BIABooster (Adelis®). A bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsies at D30 established the following groups: not-injured and injured graft (AR, INF, or AR+INF). Results: Quantification of total cfDNA was not correlated with the patient's status at D30. The percentage of dd-cfDNA was significantly higher for injured graft patients at D30 (p=0.0004). A threshold of 1.72% of dd-cfDNA correctly classified the not-injured graft patients (negative predictive value of 91.4%). Among recipients with dd-cfDNA >1.72%, the quantification of small sizes (80-120bp) >3.70% identified the INF with high performance (specificity and positive predictive value of 100%). Conclusion: With the aim of considering cfDNA as a polyvalent non-invasive biomarker in transplantation, an algorithm combining the quantification of dd-cfDNA and small sizes of DNA may significantly classify the different types of allograft injuries.

Evaluation of a new complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity cross match method using an automated cell counter, the NucleoCounter® NC-3000™.

Complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity cross match (CDC-XM) is the ultimate test of donor/recipient compatibility prior to organ transplantation. This test is based on cell viability, evaluated under fluorescence microscopy by an operator after proper staining. The determination of the positivity threshold may vary depending on the operator. We developed a new method in which the final step of determining cell viability is automated using the NC-3000™ (Chemometec®), an image cytometer able to precisely determine the percentage of dead/live cells in a suspension. After T and B donor cells isolation by negative selection, complement-dependent lysis was performed in macrovolumes in a PCR plate. Then, cell viability was measured by the NC-3000™. The sensitivity and routine CDC-XM results of this new method were compared to those of CDC-XM reference method using Terasaki plates. The sensitivity of CDC-XM expressed in the ASHI scoring system of this method was similar to the reference method results for a dilution range of the positive controls. Similarly, the results of the new method were comparable in a clinical situation to those obtained with the reference method after a study of 10 cross-matches, of which 5 cross-matches with DSA were positive and five cross-matches without DSA were negative. Moreover, ASHI scores were similar to those obtained using the reference method, and the mortality percentage was reproducible (CV < 15%). The assessment of cell viability by the NC-3000™ is easy to perform and highly reproducible but requires CDC-XM to be performed by the macrovolume method. The determination of a precise percentage of viability/mortality by the automation excludes operator variability and allows a better understanding of results close to the decision threshold.

Screening platelet function in blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of defective platelets could contribute to the inefficiency of platelet transfusion in preventing or stopping bleeding. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This single-center prospective study aimed to determine the prevalence of functional platelet abnormalities in a population of blood donors with a clinical history of bleeding diathesis or with history of hematoma (>4 cm) during blood donation. Donors with positive bleeding screening questionnaire were referred to the reference center for rare platelet diseases at La Timone University Hospital (Marseille) to confirm the bleeding tendency using a more extensive bleeding questionnaire (MCMDMscore) and to assess hemostasis, including a comprehensive platelet analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five donors identified based on a history of hematoma and 2434 blood donors were included in the study. Eighty-eight donors (3.6%) had a bleeding score indicating a potential bleeding disorder. Five donors with a history of hematoma (2.5%) and 15 (17%) donors with a confirmed bleeding score underwent hemostatic analysis, including two men and 18 women with average age of 33.9 years. Minor hemostatic abnormalities were observed in three donors. Two donors exhibited accelerated fibrinolysis with reduced euglobulin lysis time and increased D-dimer levels in serum. Two donors had a platelet granule defect, without identification of genetic abnormality. CONCLUSION: The bleeding questionnaire proved to be a valuable tool to screen blood donors for potential platelet defects. Platelet dysfunction was rare in the blood donor population assessed. Additional studies are necessary to understand the clinical impact that the transfusion of platelets with qualitative defects has on recipients.