Incidence of missed canals during endodontic treatment of maxillary first and second molars.

Untreated canals are a primary cause of persistent apical periodontitis, and the inability to identify and adequately treat canals has been considered a major cause of failure of root canal therapy in maxillary molars. The purpose of this retrospective study was to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to quantify the number of missed canals in maxillary first and second molars needing endodontic retreatment after treatment by general dentists. A total of 401 CBCT scans of maxillary first and second molars were examined. A total of 214 scan sets (53.37% [95% CI, 48.48%-58.25%]) showed evidence of an untreated canal, with the highest rate (49.38%; n = 198) observed in the second mesiobuccal canal. Imaging revealed that multiple canals were missed in some patients, for a total of 225 missed canals. The examinations showed untreated first mesiobuccal canals in 2.99% of CBCT scan sets (n = 12), untreated distobuccal canals in 2.99% of CBCT scan sets (n = 12), and untreated palatal canals in 0.75% of CBCT scan sets (n = 3). Preoperative CBCT imaging should be considered prior to initial root canal treatment of maxillary molars. When the risks and limitations of CBCT are taken into consideration, the additional information it provides can improve diagnostic accuracy, increase confidence in decision-making, and positively impact treatment planning.

Effect of different instrumentation techniques on students' performance and outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared, retrospectively, the incidence of clinical errors and effects on treatment outcomes, when students were exposed to two different instrumentation techniques: a hybrid rotary technique (HYB), consisting of both hand instrumentation with hand stainless steel and Ni-Ti files plus the use of a rotary system (Vortex Blue, Dentsply Sirona), versus a full reciprocation instrumentation technique (WaveOne Gold [WOG], Dentsply Sirona). METHODS: A total of 368 endodontic cases (n = 184) in anterior and premolar teeth, completed by dental students at the University of Michigan School of Dentistry from 2013 to 2022, were used for the study. The groups were evaluated by two calibrated clinicians, observing the incidence of clinical errors: file separations, over-instrumentation, ledges and transportations. Treatment outcomes were also observed. Data were analyzed statistically by Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: No significant difference in file separations, ledges, and transportation was observed between the two groups. However, the WOG Group experienced significantly more over-instrumentation than HYB group, although this did not significantly affect tooth survival or periapical index (PAI). Cases with PAI scores of 5 were found to have significantly less tooth survival compared to the other PAI scores. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that both techniques in our study are well suited to advancing the endodontic dental education of students and novice operators, anticipating relatively successful outcomes of tooth survival, as long as the cases selected are less severe in progression preoperatively.