Diagnostic value of gas exchange tests in patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of parameters derived from arterial blood gas tests in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. METHOD: We measured alveolar-arterial partial pressure of oxygen [P(A-a)O2] gradient, PaO2 and arterial partial pressure of carbon diaxide (PaCO2) in 773 consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism who were enrolled in the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. DIAGNOSIS: The study design required pulmonary angiography in all patients with abnormal perfusion scans. RESULTS: Of 773 scans, 270 were classified as normal/near-normal and 503 as abnormal. Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed by pulmonary angiography in 312 of 503 patients with abnormal scans. Of 312 patients with pulmonary embolism, 12, 14 and 35% had normal P(A-a)O2, PaO2 and PaCO2, respectively. Of 191 patients with abnormal scans and negative angiograms, 11, 13 and 55% had normal P(A-a)O2, PaO2 and PaCO2, respectively. The proportions of patients with normal/near-normal scans who had normal P(A-a)O2, PaO2 and PaCO2 were 20, 25 and 37%, respectively. No differences were observed in the mean values of arterial blood gas data between patients with pulmonary embolism and those who had abnormal scans and negative angiograms. Among the 773 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, 364 (47%) had prior cardiopulmonary disease. Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 151 (41%) of 364 patients with prior cardiopulmonary disease, and in 161 (39%) of 409 patients without prior cardiopulmonary disease. Among patients with pulmonary embolism, there was no difference in arterial blood gas data between patients with and those without prior CPD. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that arterial blood gas tests are of limited value in the diagnostic work-up of pulmonary embolism if they are not interpreted in conjunction with clinical and other laboratory tests.

Non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a challenging diagnostic problem because it mimics other cardiopulmonary disorders. Pulmonary angiography is still the reference standard for diagnosing PE but it is costly, invasive and not readily available. Non-invasive diagnostic strategies have therefore been developed to forego pulmonary angiography in patients suspected of having PE. Ventilation/perfusion lung scanning is, at present, the most widely used non-invasive diagnostic test for PE. A high probability ventilation/perfusion scan (segmental or greater perfusion defects with normal ventilation) warrants the institution of anticoagulant therapy especially when paired with high clinical suspicion of PE. Yet, only a minority of patients with confirmed PE have high probability ventilation/perfusion scans. Ventilation/perfusion abnormalities other than those of the high probability scan should be regarded as non-diagnostic. Under these circumstances, documentation of deep vein thrombosis by non-invasive leg testing warrants anticoagulation without the need for angiography. However, a single negative venous study result does not permit to rule out PE in patients with non-diagnostic ventilation/perfusion scans. Results of a recent prospective study indicate that accurate diagnosis or exclusion of PE is possible with perfusion lung scanning alone (without ventilation imaging). Combining perfusion lung scanning with clinical assessment helps to restrict the need for angiography to a minority of patients with suspected PE.