Universal immunogenicity validation and assessment during early biotherapeutic development to support a green laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Immunogenicity support during nonclinical biotherapeutic development can be resource intensive if supported by conventional methodologies. A universal indirect species-specific immunoassay can eliminate the need for biotherapeutic-specific anti-drug antibody immunoassays without compromising quality. By implementing the R's of sustainability (reduce, reuse, rethink), conservation of resources and greener laboratory practices were achieved in this study. RESULTS: Statistical analysis across four biotherapeutics supported identification of consistent product performance standards (cut points, sensitivity and reference limits) and a streamlined universal anti-drug antibody immunoassay method implementation strategy. CONCLUSION: We propose an efficient, fit-for-purpose, scientifically and statistically supported nonclinical immunogenicity assessment strategy. Utilization of a universal method and streamlined validation, while retaining comparability to conventional immunoassays and meeting the industry recommended standards, provides environmental credits in the scientific laboratory. Collectively, individual reductions in critical material consumption, energy usage, waste and non-environment friendly consumables, such as plastic and paper, support a greener laboratory environment.

Universal immunoassay applied during early development of large molecules to understand impact of immunogenicity on biotherapeutic exposure.

Immunogenicity testing during early biotherapeutic development is usually limited by resources needed for assay development, validation, and the necessity for unique product-specific controls and reagents. We describe a unique immunoassay [universal indirect species-specific assay (UNISA)] that can be applied during early phase preclinical studies to support pharmacology, pharmacokinetics (PK), and toxicology evaluation during biotherapeutic antibody candidate assessment. UNISA was evaluated across three animal species: mouse, rat, and cynomolgus monkey. For each species, a unique and specific antibody pair was generated consisting of the secondary antibody and the positive control. The secondary antibody is specific for species anti-IgG antibody while demonstrating no cross-reactivity to human antibody-based biotherapeutics. The positive control is comprised of a species-specific anti-human IgG antibody clone specific for binding to the CH2 domain of all human IgG subtypes. Applications of this platform included: (a) identifying the dose with the least immunogenicity risk; (b) characterizing the impact of immunogenicity on PK exposure profiles across multiple antibody candidates and dose regimens; and (c) characterizing the immune response specificity to the idiotype or non-idiotypic region of the biotherapeutic candidate. Due to its use of universal species-specific reagents, UNISA can overcome resource constraints and avoid extensive validation and development time to support immunogenicity testing during the early research and preclinical phase of programs. Enhanced understanding of the impact of the immunogenicity on biotherapeutic exposure and target-related immunomodulatory effects have been made possible with the use of this assay.

Impact of matrix-associated soluble factors on the specificity of the immunogenicity assessment.

BACKGROUND: Specificity and sensitivity are essential in assays for immunogenicity assessment of biotherapeutics. Nonspecific interactions from excess therapeutic or anti-therapeutic antibody, soluble ligands (e.g., target receptor), or serum proteins associated with autoimmune conditions (e.g., rheumatoid factor) in samples can impact the detection of a true anti-therapeutic response. RESULTS: Electrochemiluminescence-based bridging assay formats could eliminate the interference due to rheumatoid factor with no pretreatment with Melon Gel™ or aggregated IgG. The interference due to soluble factors was not platform specific for the four therapeutics evaluated in this study. CONCLUSION: Melon Gel pretreatment and avidin high-bind (Meso Scale Discovery) plates can effectively reduce interference due to rheumatoid factor in ELISA- and electrochemiluminescence-based assays, respectively. Excess levels of therapeutic and anti-therapeutic antibodies in bridging assays can impact assay specificity.