Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 18(10): 1430-1438, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34171227

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Radiology does not routinely solicit feedback on radiology reports. The aim of the study is to report the feasibility and initial results of a multi-institutional quality improvement project implementing patient and provider feedback for radiology reports. METHODS: A HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-waived quality improvement effort at two institutions obtaining patient and provider feedback for radiology reports was implemented from January 2018 to May 2020. INTERVENTION: A two-question survey (quantitative review and open text box feedback) was embedded into the electronic health records for patients and providers. Text-based feedback was evaluated, and patterns of feedback were categorized: thoroughness of reports, error in reports, timeliness of reports, access to reports, desire for patient summary, and desire for key images. We performed the χ2 test for categorical variables. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 367 responses, patients provided 219 of 367 (60%), and providers provided 148 of 367 (40%) of the feedback. A higher proportion of patients reported satisfaction with reports (76% versus 65%, P = .023) and provided more feedback compared with providers (71% versus 50%, P < .0001). Both patients and providers commented on the thoroughness of reports (12% of patients versus 9% of providers) and errors in reports (8% of patients and 9% of providers). Patients disproportionately commented on timeliness of reports (11%) and access to the reports (6%) compared with providers (3% each). In addition, 7% of patients expressed a desire for patient summaries. CONCLUSION: Report-specific patient and provider feedback demonstrate the feasibility of embedding surveys into electronic medical records. Up to 9% of the feedback addressed an error in reports.


Assuntos
Melhoria de Qualidade , Radiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Retroalimentação , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Radiology ; 296(1): 44-55, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32396045

RESUMO

Background National guidelines endorse fluorine 18 (18F) fluciclovine PET/CT for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in men with biochemically recurrent PCa. The comparative performance between fluciclovine and gallium 68 or 18F prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, a newer examination, is unclear. Purpose To compare the detection of biochemical recurrence using fluciclovine versus PSMA-targeted radiotracers in patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 2 ng/mL. Materials and Methods With use of the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy, or PRISMA-DTA, guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases between 2012 and 2019 was performed. Studies of fluciclovine PET/CT or PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence were identified. PSA levels, clinical data, and reference standards were obtained when available. A random-effects model was applied to pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around the prevalence of a positive examination, stratified according to PSA tier. Results Quantitative analysis included 482 patients (median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 67-67 years) in six fluciclovine studies and 3217 patients (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 67-70 years) in 38 PSMA studies. Pooled detection rates for PSMA and fluciclovine were 45% (95% CI: 38%, 52%) and 37% (95% CI: 25%, 49%), respectively, for a PSA level less than 0.5 ng/mL (P = .46); 59% (95% CI: 52%, 66%) and 48% (95% CI: 34%, 61%) for a PSA level of 0.5-0.9 ng/mL (P = .19); and 80% (95% CI: 75%, 85%) and 62% (95% CI: 54%, 70%) for a PSA level of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL (P = .01). A reference standard was positive in 703 of 735 patients (96%) in the PSMA cohort and 247of 256 (97%) in the fluciclovine cohort. Conclusion Patient-level detection rates for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer were greater for prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radiotracers than fluciclovine for prostate specific antigen levels of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Superfície , Ácidos Carboxílicos , Ciclobutanos , Glutamato Carboxipeptidase II , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia
3.
J Urol ; 202(2): 231-240, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30829130

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Prostate specific membrane antigen targeted radiotracers are promising agents for imaging patients with prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy. We report the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the detection of biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy for prostate cancer stratified by prostate specific antigen levels and using prostate specific membrane antigen targeted radiotracers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Diagnostic Test Accuracy guidelines, we searched for articles in PubMed® and EMBASE® databases in our systematic review from 2012 to July 2018. Studies evaluating men with prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy and without known metastatic disease who underwent prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to detect recurrent disease were included in analysis. The risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed by QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochrane Q and an I2 estimate. The reference standard was pathology findings, followup imaging or a prostate specific antigen decline after salvage treatment. We calculated pooled estimates and the 95% CI around the prevalence of a positive examination in the study population using a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 5,113 patients in 43 studies were included in this systematic review. Of the studies 15 (34.8%) were prospective, 3 (6.9%) were multi-institutional and the remainder were done at a single center. A total of 18 studies (41.8%) were done in subjects after radical prostatectomy, 2 (4.6%) were in subjects after radiotherapy and 23 (53.5%) were in subjects after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy. Median prostate specific antigen was 1.6 ng/ml (IQR 0.7-4.4) and median subject age was 68 years (IQR 67-70). Of the 43 studies 33 (76.7%) evaluated 68Ga prostate specific membrane antigen-11 (Ga-HBED-CC) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. The pooled detection rate was 70.2% (95% CI 65.0-75.4) in the entire cohort. For prostate specific antigen less than 0.5, 0.5 to 0.9, 1 to 1.9 and 2 ng/ml or greater the pooled detection rate was 44.9% (95% CI 36.0-53.9), 61.3% (95% CI 52.3-70.3), 78.2% (95% CI 70.8-85.6) and 93.9% (95% CI 92.0-95.8), respectively. A reference standard was confirmed to be positive in 684 of the 715 patients (95.7%). There were significant study heterogeneity and publication biases (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Prostate specific membrane antigen targeted radiotracers are likely effective to detect biochemically recurrent prostate cancer at low prostate specific antigen levels. However, existing studies are limited by retrospective design, limited reference standards, publication bias and a lack of interagent comparison.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Superfície/análise , Glutamato Carboxipeptidase II/análise , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Traçadores Radioativos
5.
Front Behav Neurosci ; 12: 200, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30233337

RESUMO

Prenatal ethanol exposure (PrEE) produces developmental abnormalities in brain and behavior that often persist into adulthood. We have previously reported abnormal cortical gene expression, disorganized neural circuitry along with deficits in sensorimotor function and anxiety in our CD-1 murine model of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, or FASD (El Shawa et al., 2013; Abbott et al., 2016). We have proposed that these phenotypes may underlie learning, memory, and behavioral deficits in humans with FASD. Here, we evaluate the impact of PrEE on fear memory learning, recall and amygdala development at two adult timepoints. PrEE alters learning and memory of aversive stimuli; specifically, PrEE mice, fear conditioned at postnatal day (P) 50, showed deficits in fear acquisition and memory retrieval when tested at P52 and later at P70-P72. Interestingly, this deficit in fear acquisition observed during young adulthood was not present when PrEE mice were conditioned later, at P80. These mice displayed similar levels of fear expression as controls when tested on fear memory recall. To test whether PrEE alters development of brain circuitry associated with fear conditioning and fear memory recall, we histologically examined subdivisions of the amygdala in PrEE and control mice and found long-term effects of PrEE on fear memory circuitry. Thus, results from this study will provide insight on the neurobiological and behavioral effects of PrEE and provide new information on developmental trajectories of brain dysfunction in people prenatally exposed to ethanol.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA