[Can we detect mental disorders in primary care? Usefulness and agreement of 2 diagnostic instruments]. / Podemos detectar trastornos mentales en atención primaria? Utilidad y concordancia de dos instrumentos diagnósticos.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to evaluate the use of two diagnostic instruments for mental disorders in primary care (PC): the PRIME-MD and the Goldberg anxiety and depression scales. Second, to determine the concordance between the two tests and evaluate the quality of psychiatric diagnosis records in the clinical notes. DESIGN: Crossover observational study. SETTING: Luis Vives Health Centre (EAP 1), Alcalá de Henares (Madrid). PATIENTS: 175 patients who attended for consultation on-demand over three months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Each patient was given the PRIME-MD test for detecting disorders of depression, anxiety, food, alcohol and body form; and the Goldberg scale to evaluate anxiety and depression. The clinical records were then reviewed for previous psychiatric diagnoses. The two scales were compared and the level of concordance obtained. The PRIME-MD found that 78 patients (44.6%) had some mental disorder, the most frequent being depression (32.6% of the total). The Goldberg scale detected 89 patients (50.8%) with some suspected mental disorder: here too, the most common was depression (41.7% of the total). The best indication of concordance between the two tests was the diagnosis of anxiety disorders: kappa = 0.68 (CI 95%, 0.53-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Both scales seem useful instruments for detecting a pathology which is very common in PC clinics: mental disorders. Moreover, the concordance between the two scales is acceptable. There was poor recording of psychiatric diagnoses in clinical records.

[Septicemia associated with central venous catheterization in a children's hospital. A multivariate study]. / Septicemias asociadas a la cateterización venosa central en un hospital infantil. Estudio multivariante.

BACKGROUND: The blood stream infections (BSI) are the principal nosocomial infection in the child hospitals. In this study we estimate the incidence of BSI associated with central venous catheterization, and estimate different risk and protective factors, through a multivariate study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study have followed in a prospective way during 6 months all the children with central venous catheterization (489 catheters), from the moment of insertion until withdrawal, collecting various data previous to the development of the infection: place of insert, type of catheter, duration, clinic information, microbiology, and the treatments administered through the catheter. In was accomplished an multivariate analysis with logistic regression, for two principal effect variables, the catheter colonization and the catheter related BSI. RESULTS: The incidence of catheter related BSI was 5.5% and for local infection 11.2%. The density of incidence was 3.15 and 6.42 for each 1,000 catheters-day, respectively. The logistic regression model included: colonization of the skin in the insertion point > 15 colonies, days with antibiotics through catheter, use of lipidic parenteral solutions and fever, previous to the infection. The area under the ROC curve was 0.72. CONCLUSIONS: In children with septicemias associated with central catheterization the predictors or sentry criterion for the decision on when to withdraw a catheter are colonization (> 15 colonies) of the insert point, together with the use of lipidic parenteral solutions or extended antibiotic treatment.