Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation: the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by morphologic analysis of the ST segment.

UNLABELLED: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of many causes of ST-segment elevation (STE) in emergency department (ED) chest pain (CP) patients. The morphology of STE may assist in the correct determination of its cause, with concave patterns in non-AMI syndromes and non-concave waveforms in AMI. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of STE morphologic analysis on AMI diagnosis and the ability of this technique to separate AMI from non-infarction causes of STE. METHODS: The electrocardiograms (ECGs) of consecutive ED adult CP patients (with three serial troponin I determinations) were interpreted in two-step fashion by six attending emergency physicians (EPs): 1) the determination of STE by three EPs followed by 2) STE morphologic analysis (either concave or non-concave) in those patients with STE. The impact of STE morphology analysis was investigated in the identification of AMI and non-AMI causes of STE. Acute myocardial infarction was diagnosed by abnormal serum troponin I values (>0.1 mg/dL) followed by a rise and fall of the serum marker; STE diagnoses of non-AMI causes were determined by medical record review. Interobserver reliability concerning STE morphology was determined. Study inclusion criteria included at least three troponin values performed in serial fashion no more frequently than every three hours, initial ED ECG, ED diagnosis, and final hospital diagnosis. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-nine CP patients were entered in the study, with 171 (29%) individuals having STE on their ECGs. Of the 171 patients who had STE, 56 had AMI, 50 had unstable angina pectoris (USAP), and 65 had non-coronary final diagnoses. Forty-nine patients had non-concave STE, 46 with AMI and three with USAP; no patient with a non-coronary diagnosis had a non-concave STE morphology. The sensitivity and specificity of the non-concave STE morphology for AMI diagnoses were 77% and 97%, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values for non-concave morphology in AMI diagnoses were 94% and 88%, respectively. Interobserver reliability in the STE morphology determination revealed a kappa coefficient of 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: A non-concave STE morphology is frequently encountered in AMI patients. While the sensitivity of this pattern for AMI diagnosis is not particularly helpful, the presence of this finding in adult ED chest pain patients with STE strongly suggests AMI. This technique produces consistent results among these EPs.

Cause of ST segment abnormality in ED chest pain patients.

The objective of this study was to determine the electrocardiographic diagnoses of chest pain patients with ST segment elevation (STE) on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). This study was a retrospective ECG review of adult chest pain patients in a university hospital emergency department (ED) over a 3-month period (January 1, 1996 to March 31, 1996). STE was determined if the ST segment was elevated >/=1 mm in the limb leads and >/=2 mm in the precordial leads in at least two anatomically contiguous leads. Results showed 902 patients who met entry criteria and of whom 202 (22.4%) had STE. Thirty-one (15%) patients had STE acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as the final hospital diagnosis which caused the STE; 171 (85%) patients with STE had non-AMI diagnosis responsible for the ST segment elevation, including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) 51 (25%), left bundle branch block (LBBB) 31 (15%), benign early repolarization (BER) 25 (12%), right bundle branch block 10 (5%), nonspecific bundle branch block 10 (5%), left ventricular aneurysm 5 (3%), acute pericarditis 2 (1%), ventricular paced rhythm 2 (1%), and undefined ST segment elevation 35 (17%). Forty-four patients had AMI as the final diagnosis of whom 31 showed STE on presentation to the ED. In 2 of 31 (6%) cases of STE AMI, the ST segment waveform was atypical for acute infarction. We concluded that AMI is not the most common cause of STE in ED chest pain patients. LVH is most often responsible for electrocardiographic STE followed by AMI and LBBB which occur at equal frequencies.

A comparison of 12- and 15-lead ECGS in ED chest pain patients: impact on diagnosis, therapy, and disposition.

The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of the 15-lead electrocardiogram (15ECG) on the emergency department (ED) management of chest pain (CP) patients. The design was prospective use of 15ECG with real-time physician survey and retrospective comparison to 12-lead ECG (12ECG). The study took place in a University hospital ED. Adult CP patients participated. During the 15ECG period (June 1996 to July 1996), 595 patients (92% of CP patients) had 15ECG analysis. Diagnoses of acute coronary ischemic syndromes (ACIS) were as follows: 13 acute myocardial infarction (AMI, 7 anterior [ANT], 5 inferior [INF], 1 lateral [LAT], 2 posterior [POST], 1 right ventricular [RV]) and 136 unstable angina (USA) with 47% exhibiting ECG abnormality; the 2 POST and 1 RV AMI occurred in the setting of coexisting INF AMI. The following management strategies were used: 6 fibrinolytic therapy (TT), 4 primary angioplasty (PTCA), 67 rule-out myocardial infarction (ROMI), and 144 admission to critical care unit (CCU). During the 12ECG period (June 1995 to July 1995), 599 patients were encountered. The diagnoses of ACIS were as follows: 11 AMI (5 ANT, 4 INF, 2 LAT) and 146 USA with 51% exhibiting ECG abnormality (P = NS for diagnostic comparisons to 15ECG). The following management strategies were used: 5 TT, 5 PTCA, 59 ROMI, and 137 admission to CCU (P = NS for all treatment comparisons to 15ECG). Of 15ECG cases 81% had completed real-time physician survey, showing that the diagnosis and management ACIS were not altered by the 15ECG; physicians felt, however, that the 15ECG provided a more complete anatomic picture of the ACIS. No false-positive cases of additional lead STE were noted in this investigation except in cases involving abnormal intraventricular conduction such as the bundle branch block scenario. The 15ECG provided a more complete description of myocardial injury without altering the ED diagnosis, ED-based therapy, or hospital disposition in adult CP patients. Further study is required to identify patient subset(s) which may benefit from the 15ECG.