Wandering Spleen in a Patient With Significant Medical History.

The clinical presentation of a wandering spleen is characterized mainly by unspecific acute symptoms, ranging from diffuse abdominal pain to left upper/lower quadrant and referred shoulder pain to asymptomatic. This has challenged accelerated medical care and impeded the acquisition of confirmatory diagnosis; therefore, increasing morbidity and mortality risks. Splenectomy is an established operative procedure for a wandering spleen. However, there has not been enough literature emphasizing the clinical history of congenital malformations and surgical corrections as inferential tools for facilitating a decisive and informed procedure. The case presented is of a 22-year-old female who reported to the emergency department with a five-day persistent left upper quadrant and left lower quadrant (LLQ) abdominal pain, associated with nausea. According to the medical history, the patient had a significant history of vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities (VACTERL) associated with congenital anomalies. By the age of eight years, the patient had undergone multiple surgical interventions, including tetralogy of Fallot repair, an imperforate anal repair with rectal pull-through, Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE), and bowel vaginoplasty. Computed tomography imaging of the abdomen revealed evidence of a wandering spleen in the LLQ with associated torsion of the splenic vasculature (whirl sign). Intra-operatively, appendicostomy was identified extending from the cecum in a near mid-line position, to the umbilicus, and carefully incised distally, preventing injury to the appendicostomy. The spleen was identified in the pelvis, and the individual vessels were clamped, divided, and ligated. Blood loss was minimal with no post-operative complications. This rare case report adds valuable teaching points about the treatment of wandering spleen in individuals with VACTERL anomalies.

Bridging the Gap: How to Get Osteopathic Residents Into Fellowships.

Introduction The fellowship match process is convoluted, with each specialty having its match on its timeline- with some programs having a Post Graduate Year (PGY) 4th-year or 5th-year match. This study aims to identify tangible recommendations for osteopathic surgery residents to use to improve their applications and, ultimately, the success rate for matching into post-graduate fellowship training. Methods In October 2021, as a part of the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons (ACOS) Strategic Planning efforts, the ACOS Resident Student Section sent a questionnaire to the listed email contact for each surgical fellowship program. Fellowship coordinators and program directors were included in the survey. The programs that were included in the study were vascular, thoracic (which included cardiothoracic), surgical critical care, endocrine, hepatobiliary, transplant, pediatric, surgical oncology, breast, minimally invasive, and colorectal surgery. Results Of the 108 programs that answered the survey, 36% of them reported they currently had an osteopathic fellow, and another 29% said they had an osteopathic fellow in the past. 35% of the programs listed that they had never had an osteopathic fellow in their program. In regards to how residents can improve their application for fellowship matches the most common answer was research in the field, they were trying to match into. They wanted to see high scores on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) exams. They also noted that they wanted candidates from more well know residency programs, where they knew the residents would have gotten good training. Conclusion We recommend that any potential fellowship applicant focus on the following three areas increase competitiveness for matching into fellowship training: publication in the desired field, increased overall scholarly activity, and increased ABSITE scores.

Improving Opioid Prescribing Post-Discharge for Trauma Patients With Rib Fractures: Factors in Prevention of Prolonged Use and Dependency.

BACKGROUND: Rib fracture (RF) pain management provides analgesia while reducing opioids. We postulated: (1) Prescriber factors affect opiate duration, and (2) lidocaine infusion curtails dependency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of RF patients undergoing multimodal analgesia at ACS-verified Level 1 Trauma Center April 2018-February 2020. Exclusions: age<18 y/o, GCS < 14, hospital length of stay (LOS) <3 d, <3 RF, ventilator support, injury-related mortality, disclosed/discoverable, acute/chronic opiate Rx within 90 days preadmission, substance abuse, patient inaccessible via Controlled Substance Monitoring Database (CSMD), and/or not using opioids in-/post-hospitalization. CSMD queried regarding opioid prescriptions filled by cohort. Cohort variable analysis performed on SPSS Version 27sf (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). RESULTS: 153 patients included - 113 (74%) stopped opiates by 30 days post-discharge (NORx30), 40 (26%) continued beyond 30 days (Rx+). No significant differences in age, gender, ISS, number of RF, bilaterality, flail chest, and discharge disposition. Significant differences included hospital LOS (7.62 NORx30 vs. 10.22 Rx+, p = .02), number of prescribers (1.73 NORx30 vs. 2.98 Rx+, p < .01), average MME/day during initial 30 days post-discharge (36.7 ± 17 NORx30 vs. 45.4 ± 30.2 Rx+, p = .03), and number of pills (49 ± 38 NORx30 vs. 120 ± 85 Rx+, p < .01). Patients who received lidocaine infusion (LIDO+) had lower MME/day prescribed (32.24 ± 19.9, p = .03), were younger (61.2 vs. 65.6, p < .01), had more RFs (7.1 vs. 6.05, p = .03), and shorter LOS (7.71 vs 10.2, p = .01). DISCUSSION: Prescriber attention to MME/day and number of pills dispensed affects opioid dependency. We recommend 35-40 MME/day with 50 pill/month limit prescribed by a single provider monitoring patient and CSMD. Early LI offers post-discharge opioid cessation advantage.

Intravenous Lidocaine for Rib Fractures: Effect on Pain Control and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal analgesia in rib fractures (RFs) is designed to maximize pain control while minimizing narcotics. Prior research with intravenous lidocaine (IVL) efficacy produced conflicting results. We hypothesized IVL infusion reduces opioid utilization and pain scores. METHODS: A retrospective review of RF patients at an ACS-verified Level I trauma center from April 2018 to 2/2020 was conducted. Patients (pts) stratified as receiving IVL vs no IVL. Initial lidocaine dose: 1 mg/kg/hr with a maximum of 3 mg/kg/hr. Duration of infusion: 48 h. Pain quantified by the Stanford Pain Score system (PS). Bivariate and multivariate analyses of variables were performed on SPSS, version 21 (IBM Corp). RESULTS: 414 pts met inclusion criteria: 254 males and 160 females. The average age for the non-IVL = 67.4 ± 15.2 years vs IVL = 58.3 ± 17.1 years (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for ISS, PS for initial 48 h, and ICU length of stay (LOS). There was a difference in morphine equivalents per hour: non-IVL = 1.25 vs IVL = 1.72 (P = .004) and LOS non-IVL = 10.2+/-7.6 vs IVL = 7.82+/-4.94. By analyzing IVL pts in a crossover comparison before and after IVL, there was reduction in opiates: 3.01 vs 1.72 (P < .001) and PS: 7.0 vs 4.9 (P < .001). Stanford Pain Score system reduction in the IVL = 48.3 ± 23.9%, but less effective in narcotic dependency (27 ± 22.9%, P = .035); IVL pts had hospital cost reduction: $82,927 vs $118,202 (P < .01). DISCUSSION: In a crossover analysis, IVL is effective for reduction of PS and opiate use and reduces hospital LOS and costs. Patient age may confound interpretation of results. Our data support IVL use in multimodal pain regimens. Future prospective study is warranted.