Palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: subgroup analyses of premenopausal patients in PENELOPE-B.

BACKGROUND: The PENELOPE-B study demonstrated that the addition of 1-year post-neoadjuvant palbociclib to endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (BC) did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo. Here, we report results for premenopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC at high risk of relapse [defined as no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a clinical, pathological stage, estrogen receptor, grading (CPS-EG) score ≥3 or 2/ypN+] were randomized to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib or placebo + standard ET. Ovarian function (OF) was evaluated by centrally assessed estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone serum levels. RESULTS: Overall, 616 of 1250 randomized patients were premenopausal; of these, 30.0% were <40 years of age, 47.4% had four or more metastatic lymph nodes, and 58.2% had a CPS-EG score ≥3. 66.1% of patients were treated with tamoxifen alone, and 32.9% received ovarian function suppression (OFS) in addition to either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (AI). After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (97.2% completeness) no difference in iDFS between palbociclib and placebo was observed [hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.30, P = 0.737]. The estimated 3-year iDFS rate was marginally higher in the palbociclib arm (80.6% versus 78.3%). Three year iDFS was higher in patients receiving AI than tamoxifen plus OFS or tamoxifen alone (86.0% versus 78.6% versus 78.0%). Patients receiving tamoxifen plus OFS showed a favorable iDFS with palbociclib (83.0% versus 74.1%, hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-1.02, P = 0.057). Hematologic adverse events were more frequent with palbociclib (76.1% versus 1.9% grade 3-4, P < 0.001). Palbociclib seems not to negatively impact the OF throughout the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: In premenopausal women, who received tamoxifen plus OFS as ET, the addition of palbociclib to ET results in a favorable iDFS. The safety profile seems favorable and in contrast to chemotherapy palbociclib does not impact OF throughout the treatment period.

Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine, in women with primary operable breast cancer, if preoperative doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan; AC) therapy yields a better outcome than postoperative AC therapy, if a relationship exists between outcome and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy, and if such therapy results in the performance of more lumpectomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (1,523) enrolled onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18 were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative AC therapy. Clinical tumor response to preoperative therapy was graded as complete (cCR), partial (cPR), or no response (cNR). Tumors with a cCR were further categorized as either pathologic complete response (pCR) or invasive cells (pINV). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival were estimated through 5 years and compared between treatment groups. In the preoperative arm, proportional-hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between outcome and tumor response. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in DFS, DDFS, or survival (P = .99, .70, and .83, respectively) among patients in either group. More patients treated preoperatively than postoperatively underwent lumpectomy and radiation therapy (67.8% v 59.8%, respectively). Rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after lumpectomy were similar in both groups (7.9% and 5.8%, respectively; P = .23). Outcome was better in women whose tumors showed a pCR than in those with a pINV, cPR, or cNR (relapse-free survival [RFS] rates, 85.7%, 76.9%, 68.1%, and 63.9%, respectively; P < .0001), even when baseline prognostic variables were controlled. When prognostic models were compared for each treatment group, the preoperative model, which included breast tumor response as a variable, discriminated outcome among patients to about the same degree as the postoperative model. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemotherapy is as effective as postoperative chemotherapy, permits more lumpectomies, is appropriate for the treatment of certain patients with stages I and II disease, and can be used to study breast cancer biology. Tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with outcome and could be a surrogate for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy on micrometastases; however, knowledge of such a response provided little prognostic information beyond that which resulted from postoperative therapy.

Expansion of melanoma-specific lymphocytes in alternate gamma chain cytokines: gene expression variances between T cells and T-cell subsets exposed to IL-2 versus IL-7/15.

We have previously demonstrated that expansion of activated tumor-sensitized T cells in interleukin (IL)-7/15 results in greater expansion and antitumor activity than expansion in IL-2. We sought to determine whether T cells exposed to IL-2 versus IL-7/15 exhibited distinct gene expression patterns. Lymphocytes were harvested from Pmel-1 mice immunized with B16-GMCSF melanoma cells, activated in vitro, and cultured in IL-2 or IL-7/15 for 1, 3 or 6 days. T cells were harvested and analyzed using microarray, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-QPCR) or sorted into T-cell subsets and analyzed. We found significant differences in gene expression for T cells cultured in IL-2 versus IL-7/15, starting on day 3. This was not a function of subset differentiation; when T cells were divided into subsets, the central memory (T(CM)), effector memory (T(EM)) and effector (T(E)) T cells cultured in the IL-2 more closely resembled each other than the identical phenotypic subset exposed to IL-7/15. Thus, the differences in gene expression induced by culture in IL-2 versus IL-7/15 do not merely reflect differences in the frequency of T(CM) versus T(EM) versus T(E) cells, but rather reflect that the gene expression levels of those T-cell subsets when exposed to different cytokines are fundamentally different.

Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: new perspectives 2006.

Neoadjuvant (primary systemic) treatment has become a standard option for primary operable disease for patients who are candidates for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, irrespective of the size of the tumor. Because of new treatments and new understandings of breast cancer, however, recommendations published in 2006 regarding neoadjuvant treatment for operable disease required updating. Therefore, a third international panel of representatives of a number of breast cancer clinical research groups was convened in September 2006 to update these recommendations. As part of this effort, data published to date were critically reviewed and indications for neoadjuvant treatment were newly defined.

Adoptive immunotherapy of cancer with pharmacologically activated lymph node lymphocytes: a pilot clinical trial.

Adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) of cancer with T lymphocytes may be limited by the need to activate tumor antigen-sensitized cells in vitro. In murine models, we have shown that AIT with tumor-sensitized T cells that have been pharmacologically activated with bryostatin 1 and ionomycin plus interleukin-2 can induce tumor regression. A Phase I clinical trial was carried out to assess the feasibility and toxicity associated with using tumor- or vaccine-draining lymph node cells, activated pharmacologically and expanded in culture with low-dose interleukin-2 and infused intravenously, followed by IL-2 infusion. Nine patients were entered into the trial, and six were treated as planned. Average expansion of cell numbers over 13 to 27 days in culture was 118-fold. No patient's cells reached the target cell number (2.5 x 10(10)). Infusion of these cells did not result in any unexpected toxicities. The toxicities observed were related to IL-2 infusion, and conformed to the expected range of side-effects. Based on these Phase I results, additional trials, with tumor antigen vaccine-sensitized DLN and technical modifications of the culture technique, are planned.

Do surgical oncologists achieve lower rates of local-regional recurrence in node positive breast cancer treated with mastectomy alone?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Adjuvant radiotherapy for node positive breast cancer postmastectomy has been recommended by two previously published randomized controlled trials (RCT). The local-regional recurrence rates in the control arms, however, were considered by some critics to be excessive (> 25% at 10 years). Inadequate surgery, as evidenced by the low number of axillary nodes reported, may have resulted in the high local-regional recurrence rates, allowing for the benefits seen with radiotherapy. Fellowship trained surgical oncologists might provide "better quality" surgery, resulting in lower recurrence rates and thus making adjuvant radiotherapy unnecessary. Our objective was to establish the local-regional control rate postmastectomy in node positive breast cancer patients operated on by surgical oncologists, and to determine if treatment recommendations from previous RCTs are generalizable. METHODS: Node positive stage IIb and IIIa breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy at the Medical College of Virginia Hospitals by surgical oncologists, without adjuvant radiotherapy, and entered into adjuvant chemotherapy trials between 1978 and 1993 were identified retrospectively. Pathology and follow-up records were reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven patients were identified. A median of 18 axillary nodes was reported with a median of 4 positive nodes. The locoregional recurrence at 10-years was 27% (95% confidence interval, 19-35%). CONCLUSION: Despite some evidence of "better quality" surgery, there was no clinically significant difference in the local-regional recurrence rate in this case series compared to controls in two previous RCTs. Recommendations for postmastectomy radiotherapy should be considered for node positive breast cancers, even if operated upon by surgical oncologists.

Bryostatin/ionomycin-activated T cells mediate regression of established tumors.

We have shown that adoptive transfer of tumor-sensitized lymphocytes activated in vitro with bryostatin-1 and ionomycin (B/I), and expanded in culture, can induce regression of small established tumors. We set out to determine whether similar treatment would be effective against larger tumors and what cells mediate this effect. We also attempted to shorten the ex vivo culture period with the ultimate aim of developing a more clinically useful protocol. BALB/c mice were injected in one footpad with IL-2-transfected 4T07 mammary tumor cells. Ten days later, popliteal draining lymph nodes (DLN) were harvested and activated with B/I for 18 h. Mice with either 3-day or 10-day 4T07 flank tumors were treated with cyclophosphamide (100 mg/ kg ip, CYP) alone or CYP followed the next day by infusion of either B/I-activated lymphocytes transferred immediately or activated cells that had been expanded in vitro for 3 or 10 days. In some experiments, mice were also treated with rat anti-mouse CD4 monoclonal antibody (GK1.5) or anti-CD8 antibody (2.43). All mice receiving CYP alone or CYP + sensitized, nonactivated DLN cells demonstrated progressive tumor growth. One hundred percent (6/6) of mice treated with CYP + AIT with B/I-activated,10-day expanded cells had complete regression of 3-day flank tumors. Treatment with activated, nonexpanded cells, induced tumor regression in a majority of mice, but was not as reliable as AIT with expanded cells. We developed a protocol with a shortened expansion period (3-day) that was efficacious for treatment of 4T07 when adoptively transferred to either 3 or 10 day tumor-bearing mice. In vivo depletion of CD4(+) cells had no effect on regression of 3-day tumors, but treatment with anti-CD8 antibody abrogated the effect of immunotherapy. Adoptive transfer of B/I-activated cells, with or without long-term expansion, induced regression of early and late stage 4T07 tumors and is dependent on CD8(+) but not CD4(+) T cells.

Protective role of IL-2 during activation of T cells with bryostatin 1.

Pharmacologic agents such as bryostatin 1 (bryostatin) can regulate cell activation, growth, and differentiation by modulating the activities of protein kinase C isoenzymes. Inhibition of growth of tumor cells and activation of T lymphocytes in vitro are the most recognized consequences of bryostatin treatment. The effect of bryostatin on T cells ranges from induction of apoptotic cell death to T cell activation, expansion, and acquisition of antigen-specific effector functions. Here, we describe the conditions under which these wide ranging effects occur. Mouse mammary tumor 4TO7-IL-2-primed lymph node cells exposed ex vivo to bryostatin upregulated CD25 expression but lost the ability to secrete IL-2. Most of these cells died by apoptosis unless IL-2 was provided for the duration of bryostatin treatment. Analysis of T cell repertoire by screening of T cells for the expression of different Vbeta T cell receptor (TCR) families revealed that bryostatin-induced T cell death was unbiased and Vbeta-nonspecific. Within particular Vbeta clones, only CD25(+) T cells survived exposure to bryostatin and IL-2. Treatment of 4TO7 tumor-bearing mice with a single injection of low dose bryostatin followed by multiple low doses of IL-2, but not with bryostatin alone, delayed tumor growth. These results indicate that activation of T cells with bryostatin should be carried out under protection of exogenous IL-2 to ensure survival and expansion of T cells that may exhibit anti-tumor activity.

Evaluation of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) of the breast at a single institution.

Stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) has become a popular method for diagnosis of occult breast abnormalities. There are few large series of SCNB from a single institution. Data on patients undergoing SCNB for mammographic abnormalities were collected prospectively over 43 months at a university hospital. Mammographic findings were categorized as benign, probably benign, indeterminate, suspicious or malignant. For lesions with SCNB pathology that were non-diagnostic, showed atypical hyperplasia or malignancy (in situ or invasive), or were discordant with the pre-biopsy mammogram findings, surgical excision was recommended. Subsequent surgical pathology was reviewed. All remaining lesions were followed mammographically after SCNB. SCNB was performed on 692 lesions in 607 patients. There were 79 malignancies, for a positive SCNB rate of 11.4%. The 349 SCNB performed for benign, probably benign and indeterminate lesions on mammography had a positive SCNB rate of only 4%. Surgery was recommended for 127 (18.3%) lesions, while 565 (81.6%) were followed mammographically after SCNB. A compliance rate of 61 % for at least one follow-up mammogram was obtained, with a median follow-up of 17.2 months and with no cancers found. The sensitivity for malignancy with SCNB was 93%. SCNB provides a minimally invasive method to assess mammographic abnormalities. Abnormalities considered radiographically to be other than malignant or suspicious yielded few cancers. In this series a low positive SCNB rate resulted in no false negatives on mammographic follow-up. The optimal positive biopsy rate for SCNB is debatable.

Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FU+LV) with that of fluorouracil and levamisole (FU+LEV) or with the combination of FU+LV and levamisole (FU+LV+LEV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1989 and December 1990, 2,151 patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the colon were entered onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowl Project protocol C-04. Patients were randomly assigned to receive FU+LV (weekly regimen), FU + LEV, or the combination of FU+LV+LEV. The average time on study was 86 months. RESULTS: A pairwise comparison between patients treated with FU+LV or FU+LEV disclosed a prolongation in disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of the FU+LV group (65% v 60%; P =.04); there was a small prolongation in overall survival that was of borderline significance (74% v 70%; P =.07). There was no difference in the pairwise comparison between patients who received FU+LV or FU+LV+LEV for either DFS (65% v 64%; P =.67) or overall survival (74% v 73%; P =.99). There was no interaction between Dukes' stage and the effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon, treatment with FU+LV seems to confer a small DFS advantage and a borderline prolongation in overall survival when compared with treatment with FU+LEV. The addition of LEV to FU+LV does not provide any additional benefit over and above that achieved with FU+LV. These findings support the use of adjuvant FU+LV as an acceptable therapeutic standard in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon.

Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes' B versus Dukes' C colon cancer: results from four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04)

PURPOSE: Although the benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy has been clearly established in patients with Dukes' C colon cancer, such benefit has been questioned in patients with Dukes' B disease. To determine whether patients with Dukes' B disease benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and to evaluate the magnitude of the benefit, compared with that observed in Dukes' C patients, we examined the relative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy according to Dukes' stage in four sequential National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04) that compared different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens with each other or with no adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The four trials included Dukes' B and C patients and were conducted between 1977 and 1990. The eligibility criteria and follow-up requirements were similar for all four trials. Protocol C-01 compared adjuvant semustine, vincristine, and fluorouracil (5-FU) (MOF regimen) with operation alone. Protocol C-02 compared the perioperative administration of a portal venous infusion of 5-FU with operation alone. Protocol C-03 compared adjuvant 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) with adjuvant MOF. Protocol C-04 compared adjuvant 5-FU and LV with 5-FU and levamisole (LEV) and with the combination of 5-FU, LV, and LEV. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of the patients included in these four trials had resected Dukes' B tumors. In all four studies, the overall, disease-free, and recurrence-free survival improvement noted for all patients was evident in both Dukes' B and Dukes' C patients. When the relative efficacy of chemotherapy was examined, there was always an observed reduction in mortality, recurrence, or disease-free survival event, irrespective of Dukes' stage, and in most instances, the reduction was as great or greater for Dukes' B patients as for Dukes' C patients. When data from all four trials were examined in a combined analysis, the mortality reduction was 30% for Dukes' B patients versus 18% for Dukes' C patients. The mortality reduction in Dukes' B patients occurred irrespective of the presence or absence of adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Patients with Dukes' B colon cancer benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and should be presented with this treatment option. Regardless of the presence or absence of other clinical prognostic factors, Dukes' B patients seem to benefit from chemotherapy administration.

Accelerated superfractionated radiotherapy for inflammatory breast carcinoma: complete response predicts outcome and allows for breast conservation.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy and accelerated superfractionated radiotherapy were prospectively applied for inflammatory breast carcinoma with the intent of breast conservation. The efficacy, failure patterns, and patient tolerance utilizing this approach were analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1983 and 1996, 52 patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma presented to the Medical College of Virginia Hospitals of VCU and the New England Medical Center. Thirty-eight of these patients were jointly evaluated in multidisciplinary breast clinics and managed according to a defined prospectively applied treatment policy. Patients received induction chemotherapy, accelerated superfractionated radiotherapy, selected use of mastectomy, and concluded with additional chemotherapy. The majority were treated with 1.5 Gy twice daily to field arrangements covering the entire breast and regional lymphatics. An additional 18-21 Gy was then delivered to the breast and clinically involved nodal regions. Total dose to clinically involved areas was 63-66 Gy. Following chemoradiotherapy, patients were evaluated with physical examination, mammogram, and fine needle aspiration x 3. Mastectomy was reserved for those patients with evidence of persistent or progressive disease in the involved breast. All patients received additional chemotherapy. RESULTS: Median age was 51 years. Median follow-up was 23.9 months (6-86) months. The breast preservation rate at the time of last follow-up was 74%. The treated breast or chest wall as the first site of failure occurred in only 13%, and the ultimate local control rate with the selected use of mastectomy was 74%. Ten patients underwent mastectomy, 2 of which had pathologically negative specimens despite a clinically palpable residual mass. Response to chemotherapy was predictive of treatment outcome. Of the 15 patients achieving a complete response, 87% remain locoregionally controlled without the use of mastectomy. Five-year overall survival for complete responders was 68%. This is in contrast to the 14% 5-year overall survival observed with incomplete responders. The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival and overall survival for the entire patient cohort was 11% and 33%, respectively. All patients tolerated irradiation with limited acute effects, of which all were managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: Our experience demonstrates that induction chemotherapy, accelerated superfractionated radiotherapy, and the selected use of mastectomy results in excellent locoregional control rates, is well tolerated, and optimizes breast preservation. Based on our present results, we recommend that a patient's response to induction chemotherapy guide the treatment approach used for locoregional disease, such that mastectomy be reserved for incomplete responders and avoided in those achieving a complete response.

Involvement of protein kinase C-delta in CD28-triggered cytotoxicity mediated by a human leukaemic cell line YT.

Ligation of CD28 molecules expressed on the surface of human leukaemic natural killer-like YT cells triggers intracellular signals leading to cytolysis of target cells expressing CD80 or CD86 molecules. Known intracellular events include tyrosine phosphorylation, activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and protein kinase C (PKC). In this study, we report that PKC-delta isoenzyme activity is required for CD28-triggered cytotoxicity mediated by YT cells and we also demonstrate that one of the primary targets of bryostatin 1, a modulator of PKC activity, is PKC-delta. Treatment of YT cells with bryostatin 1 caused degradation of PKC-delta, but not other PKC isoenzymes, and completely blocked the cytolytic activity of YT cells. In addition, PKC-delta-specific antibody introduced into YT cells by electroporation inhibited partially the YT cell-mediated cytotoxicity of B-lymphoblastoid cell line JY. This effect was specific, since addition of anti-PKC-delta antibody-blocking peptide in combination with anti-PKC-delta antibody to YT cells for electroporation, neutralized the effect of this antibody. These results demonstrate that YT cell cytolytic activity is dependent on PKC-delta, which is selectively down-regulated by bryostatin 1.

Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine, in women with primary operable breast cancer, if preoperative doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan; AC) therapy yields a better outcome than postoperative AC therapy, if a relationship exists between outcome and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy, and if such therapy results in the performance of more lumpectomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (1,523) enrolled onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18 were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative AC therapy. Clinical tumor response to preoperative therapy was graded as complete (cCR), partial (cPR), or no response (cNR). Tumors with a cCR were further categorized as either pathologic complete response (pCR) or invasive cells (pINV). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival were estimated through 5 years and compared between treatment groups. In the preoperative arm, proportional-hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between outcome and tumor response. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in DFS, DDFS, or survival (P = .99, .70, and .83, respectively) among patients in either group. More patients treated preoperatively than postoperatively underwent lumpectomy and radiation therapy (67.8% v 59.8%, respectively). Rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after lumpectomy were similar in both groups (7.9% and 5.8%, respectively; P = .23). Outcome was better in women whose tumors showed a pCR than in those with a pINV, cPR, or cNR (relapse-free survival [RFS] rates, 85.7%, 76.9%, 68.1%, and 63.9%, respectively; P < .0001), even when baseline prognostic variables were controlled. When prognostic models were compared for each treatment group, the preoperative model, which included breast tumor response as a variable, discriminated outcome among patients to about the same degree as the postoperative model. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemotherapy is as effective as postoperative chemotherapy, permits more lumpectomies, is appropriate for the treatment of certain patients with stages I and II disease, and can be used to study breast cancer biology. Tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with outcome and could be a surrogate for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy on micrometastases; however, knowledge of such a response provided little prognostic information beyond that which resulted from postoperative therapy.

Phase Ib trial of bryostatin 1 in patients with refractory malignancies.

A Phase Ib trial of bryostatin 1, a macrocyclic lactone and protein kinase C (PKC) activator, was conducted in patients with refractory nonhematological malignancies with the primary goal of determining whether down-regulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMNC) PKC activity could be achieved in vivo in humans. Patients (four patients/cohort) received bryostatin 1 (25 microg/m2) as a 1-h infusion weekly three times every 4 weeks, but to study the schedule dependence of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, the first dose was administered according to one of three schedules: (a) a 1-h infusion; (b) a 24-h infusion; or (c) a split course (12.5 microg/m2 as a 30-min infusion) on days 1 and 4. Conventional toxicities (grades I-III) included myalgias, fever, anemia, fatigue, phlebitis, and headache; in addition, two patients in cohort 3 experienced transient elevations in liver function tests, although these patients had preexisting liver metastases. No objective clinical responses were encountered. Effects on PBMNC PKC activity were heterogeneous. Several patients in cohorts 1 and 2 experienced significant declines in activity (approximately 50%) that were sustained in some cases for periods of > or = 72 h. Comparison of 72-h with baseline values for all three patient cohorts combined revealed a trend toward PKC down-regulation (P = 0.06; signed rank test). For each schedule, plasma bryostatin 1 levels were below the level of detection of a platelet aggregation-based bioassay (3-4 nm). Bryostatin 1 administration failed to produce consistent alterations in lymphocyte immunophenotypic profiles, interleukin 2-induced proliferation, or cytotoxicity, although two of three samples from patients in cohort 3 did show significant posttreatment increases in proliferation. Moreover, in some patients, bryostatin 1 treatment increased lymphokine-activated killer cell activity. These findings indicate that bryostatin 1 doses of 25 microg/m2 can induce in vivo PBMNC PKC down-regulation in at least a subset of patients and raise the possibility that higher bryostatin 1 doses may be more effective in achieving this effect.