Popliteal artery aneurysm ultrasound criteria for reporting characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is the modality of choice for surveillance of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs). However, noninvasive vascular laboratories have no standard guidelines for reporting results. This study assessed reports of PAA DUS for inclusion of information pertinent to operative decision-making and timing of surveillance. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of a multi-institutional repository that was queried for all patients with a PAA from 2008 to 2022 and confirmed via manual chart review. DUS reports were abstracted and images were individually annotated for features of interest including dimensions, flow abnormalities, and percent thrombus burden. RESULTS: A total of 166 PAAs in 130 patients had at least one DUS available for viewing. Postoperative surveillance of PAAs was performed at several intervals: the first at 30 months (IQR 3.7-113, n = 44), the second at 64 months (IQR 20-172, n = 31), and the third at 152 months (IQR 46-217, n = 16) after the operation. The largest diameter of operative PAAs (median 27.5 mm, IQR 21.8-38.0) was significantly greater than nonoperative PAAs (median 20.9 mm, IQR 16.7-27.3); p < 0.01. Fewer than 33 (21%) reports commented on patency of distal runoff. We calculated an average percent thrombus of 60% (IQR 19-81) in nonoperative PAAs, which is significantly smaller than 75% (IQR 58-89) in operative PAAs; p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, PAAs are often not followed at intervals recommended by the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines and do not include all measurements necessary for clinical decision-making in the multi-institutional repository studied. There should be standardization of PAA DUS protocols performed by all noninvasive vascular laboratories to ensure completeness of PAA DUS images and inclusion of characteristics pertinent to clinical decision-making in radiology reports.

Increased anti-thrombotic therapy is associated with decreased major adverse limb events in patients with low wound and foot infection scores.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal anti-thrombotic management of patients after lower extremity bypass has yet to be fully elucidated, in part due to significant heterogeneity in patient presentation and practice patterns. The Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) score is a validated scoring system to assist in the management of patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). We hypothesized that performing a restriction analysis based on WIFI scores would assist in the postoperative anti-thrombotic management of patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of infrainguinal bypass procedures completed at a single hospital system between January 2018 and January 2021 was selected, and preoperative WIfI scores were extracted for each patient. Patients with either Wound scores of 2 and 3, or Ischemia Scores of 0 and 1, or Foot Infection Scores of 3 were excluded. Based on the type of anti-thrombotic regimen on discharge, demographics, comorbidities, type of bypass, 30-day rates of graft occlusion, major amputation, mortality, and major adverse limb events (MALE) were analyzed. Statistical analysis included t-tests, chi square tests, and time-to-event survival analysis. RESULTS: 230 procedures were included in the study. 69 (30.0%) patients were discharged on single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), compared to 161 (70.0%) who were discharged on either dual antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation (DAPT/AC). There was a higher prevalence of bypasses using prosthetic conduit in the DAPT/AC group (45.9 vs 31.8%, p = .047); no other demographic or procedural variable analyzed had any significant differences. At 30-days postoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative reintervention rates, however, the DAPT/AC group had significantly lower rates of mortality (1.2 vs 7.2%, p = .01), major amputation (1.2% vs 5.8%, p = .04), and MALE (3.7 vs 13.0%, p < .01). There were no significant differences in bleeding complications. Survival analysis demonstrated that MALE-free survival was higher in the DAPT/AC group compared to the SAPT group (p < .01). On Cox regression analysis, DAPT/AC was associated with significantly decreased rates of MALE + mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.20 [0.06 - 0.66]). CONCLUSION: Lower extremity bypasses patients with low Wound and low foot Infection scores who are discharged on DAPT/AC postoperatively have a significantly higher 30-day MALE-free survival rate compared to patients discharged on SAPT; consideration could be made to preferentially discharge such post-bypass patients on DAPT/AC.