Characterising knotting properties of polymers in nanochannels.

Using a lattice model of polymers in a tube, we define one way to characterise different configurations of a given knot as either "local" or "non-local", based on a standard approach for measuring the "size" of a knot within a knotted polymer chain. The method involves associating knot-types to subarcs of the chain, and then identifying a knotted subarc with minimal arclength; this arclength is then the knot-size. If the resulting knot-size is small relative to the whole length of the chain, then the knot is considered to be localised or "local"; otherwise, it is "non-local". Using this definition, we establish that all but exponentially few sufficiently long self-avoiding polygons (closed chains) in a tubular sublattice of the simple cubic lattice are "non-locally" knotted. This is shown to also hold for the case when the same polygons are subject to an external tensile force, as well as in the extreme case when they are as compact as possible (no empty lattice sites). We also provide numerical evidence for small tube sizes that at equilibrium non-local knotting is more likely than local knotting, regardless of the strength of the stretching or compressing force. The relevance of these results to other models and recent experiments involving DNA knots is also discussed.

Advanced rural skills training: are recently qualified GPs using their procedural skills?

INTRODUCTION: The number of GPs providing procedural services in rural areas is declining; however, few studies have investigated issues directly relevant to recently qualified doctors. Limited published data and anecdotal reports in Australia suggest that a large proportion of doctors leave rural procedural practice soon after training. This study aimed to: (1) describe where GPs practice in the 5 years after advanced rural skills training; (2) describe the proportion of doctors using their advanced skills; (3) measure doctors' ratings of the quality of support and how critical the year directly following training is in future career choices; and (4) measure the association between support and use of advanced skills. METHODS: A cross-sectional, postal survey was undertaken of doctors who had completed advanced rural skills training in Queensland between 1995 and June 2009. Data were collected on a three-page, structured questionnaire. General practice colleges, the three Queensland regional training providers and one national training provider were approached in order to identify and mail questionnaires to eligible doctors. Descriptive statistics were prepared for practice history information, and attitudinal ratings. A χ(2) test was used to analyse the association between support and use of skills. RESULTS: Sixty-one completed questionnaires were returned resulting in an unadjusted response rate of 51.7%. Respondents had completed a range of training posts: obstetrics and gynaecology (37.7%), anaesthetics (18%), anaesthetics and obstetrics and gynaecology (11.5%) and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health (11.5%). Thirty-nine respondents (63.9%) were using skills related to their advanced training at the time of the study. In the first 5 years after training, the percentage of doctors using their advanced rural skills decreased from 75.4% to 61.1%. The year directly following advanced training was rated as 'critical' or 'very critical' in their future career choices by 68.9% of respondents. However, ratings of the quality of support received in that year were varied, with 21.4% reporting 'very poor' support. There was a statistically significant association between ratings of support in the year directly following training and the use of skills 3 years after training (χ(2) = 8.715, df = 2, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that while the majority of doctors are using skills related to their advanced rural skills training, there is room for improvement through training and career planning support, extending formal support mechanisms into the first year after training, improving opportunities to use advanced skills and improving systems to re-engage doctors into procedural practice.

Regionalisation of rural medical training in far north Queensland: a learning experience for medical educators and managers.

The need for an appropriate, dedicated vertically-integrated training pathway for rural doctors, provided by regional consortia of educational organisations, has been clearly identified by Rural Doctors Association of Queensland (RDAQ) and The Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM) as a key strategy to resolve rural medical workforce issues. The opportunity to put the ideas into action is now here with rural doctors responding to the challenge of managing more reform in general practice all over Australia. In Far North Queensland, the ongoing reform of general practice education has been challenging, with many lessons learned by both educators and managers. This paper describes the management of change, and outlines key principles and characteristics of a successful regional rural medical training system, building on the lessons learned from the Rural and Remote Area Placement Program (RRAP) and other projects.

Good luck and good management: the miracle escape.

This case study illustrates the importance of education and training in the early management of reverse trauma in the rural setting. It clearly demonstrates the importance of ensuring a safe approach including an outline for the appropriate management of electrocution.

General practice medical records: why code? Why classify?

Recently, the Information Management Steering Group (IMSG) [a RACGP-AMA-Commonwealth Government committee responsible for the planning of information management in general practice], held a Coding Workshop at which available coding systems and their application in general practice computerised medical records were reviewed. As there has been in the past some discussion as to the value of coding, the workshop participants agreed that a paper outlining the reasons for coding and classifying clinical data should be prepared and disseminated to all general practitioners.