The IRDiRC Chrysalis Task Force: making rare disease research attractive to companies.

Background: The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC) is an international initiative that aims to use research to facilitate rapid diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases. Objective: IRDiRC launched the Chrysalis Task Force to identify key financial and nonfinancial factors that make rare disease research and development attractive to companies. Methods: The Chrysalis Task Force was comprised of thought leaders from companies, patient advocacy groups, regulatory agencies, and research funders. The Task Force created a survey that was distributed to companies of different sizes with varied investment portfolios and interests in rare disease research. Based on the survey results, the Task Force then conducted targeted interviews. Results: The survey and interview respondents identified several factors that make rare disease research and development attractive (e.g. a good understanding of the underlying biology) as well as barriers (e.g. absence of an advocacy organization representing the affected community's needs). The concept of Return On Investment allowed the exploration of factors that were weighed differently by survey and interview respondents, depending on a number of intrinsic and extrinsic issues. Conclusions: The Chrysalis Task Force identified factors attributable to rare disease research and development that may be of interest to and actionable by funders, academic researchers, patients and their families, companies, regulators, and payers in the medium term to short term. By addressing the identified challenges, involved parties may seek solutions to significantly advance the research and development of treatments for rare diseases.

Making rare disease research attractive to companies The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC) is an international initiative that aims to speed the diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases through research. The IRDiRC Chrysalis Task Force, comprised of thought leaders from companies, patient advocacy groups, regulatory agencies, and research funders, identified key factors that make rare disease research and development attractive to companies. The Task Force distributed a survey to companies with varied investment portfolios and interests in rare disease research, followed by in-depth interviews based on the survey results. The survey and interview respondents identified both attractive factors and barriers to rare disease research and development. The concept of Return On Investment was used to frame discussion of factors that companies weighed differently, depending on a number of issues that were a function of both the company itself and outside factors. The identified challenges can be addressed by funders, academic researchers, patients and their families, companies, regulators, and payers, which hopefully will lead to significant advances in the research and development of treatments for rare diseases.

A phase II trial of carboplatin for intraocular retinoblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Retinoblastoma patients with RB1 germline mutations are at risk of developing second malignancies and external beam radiation therapy increases the risk. Carboplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens in conjunction with local therapies have been investigated for intraocular retinoblastoma, but the lack of data regarding the efficacy of single agent intravenous carboplatin prompted this phase II study. PROCEDURE: Twenty-five patients (43 eyes) were treated with intravenous carboplatin (18.7 mg/kg for patients < 12 kg, 560 mg/m(2) for patients >/= 12 kg). Patients received a median of two cycles of carboplatin (range one to five cycles) beginning at a median age of 5 months (range 14 days to 22 months). RESULTS: All patients were extraocular disease free during the follow-up period (median 76.3 months). Responses were noted in 33 of 36 evaluable eyes (92%). The 5-year overall ocular and ocular event-free survivals were 93.3% (95% CI, 84.4-100%) and 43.5% (95% CI, 25.8-61.3%) for eyes treated for Reese-Ellsworth (RE) group 1-3 disease and 25.0% (95% CI, 1.0-50.0%) and 8.3% (95% CI, 0-24.0%) for RE group 4-5 disease, respectively. No non-hematopoietic serious or permanent toxicities related to the chemotherapy were observed. CONCLUSION: When used as a neoadjuvant agent, carboplatin usually leads to objective responses of intraocular retinoblastoma. The 5-year ocular event-free survival appears inferior to other protocols using more extensive chemotherapy, but with greater radiation therapy usage, overall ocular survival rate for RE group 1-3 eyes was excellent.

Clinical implications of promoter hypermethylation in RASSF1A and MGMT in retinoblastoma.

We investigated the epigenetic silencing and genetic changes of the RAS-associated domain family 1A (RASSF1A) gene and the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene in retinoblastoma. We extracted DNA from microdissected tumor and normal retina tissues of the same patient in 68 retinoblastoma cases. Promoter methylation in RASSF1A and MGMT was analyzed by methylation-specific PCR, RASSF1A sequence alterations in all coding exons by direct DNA sequencing, and RASSF1A expression by RT-PCR. Cell cycle staging was analyzed by flow cytometry. We detected RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation in 82% of retinoblastoma, in tumor tissues only but not in adjacent normal retinal tissue cells. There was no expression of RASSF1A transcripts in all hypermethylated samples, but RASSF1A transcripts were restored after 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine treatment with no changes in cell cycle or apoptosis. No mutation in the RASSF1A sequence was found. MGMT hypermethylation was present in 15% of the retinoblastoma samples, and the absence of MGMT hypermethylation was associated (P = .002) with retinoblastoma at advanced Reese-Ellsworth tumor stage. Our results revealed a high RASSF1A hypermethylation frequency in retinoblastoma. The correlation of MGMT inactivation by promoter hypermethylation with lower-stage diseases indicated that MGMT hypermethylation provides useful prognostic information. Epigenetic mechanism plays an important role in the progression of retinoblastoma.

Microsatellite instability and MLH1 promoter methylation in human retinoblastoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the link between microsatellite instability and epigenetic silencing of the MLH1 gene in the human retinoblastoma genome. METHODS: Methylation at the 5' region of MLH1 was studied, along with its protein expression level by using immunohistochemical staining in 51 retinoblastoma tumors and 2 retinoblastoma cell lines. Also assessed was the genomic stability of 26 retinoblastoma DNAs from microdissected tumor tissue and matched normal retina tissue obtained from the same patient by microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis. The National Cancer Institute-designed reference panel, and 85 markers on chromosomes 1, 6, 9, and 13 were used. RESULTS: Hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter was detected in the WERI-Rb1 cell line and in 34 (67%) of the 51 tumors, but not in cell line Y79 and the other 17 tumors. MLH1 hypermethylation was associated with null MLH1 protein expression (P < 0.0005) and with well-differentiated histology (P < 0.05). MSI at three markers (D2S123, D6S470, and D13S265) was frequently identified among 26 retinoblastoma specimens with matched normal DNA. Among these 26 retinoblastomas, high-frequency MSI (MSI-H) tumors were detected in 19% (5/26) and low-frequency MSI (MSI-L) in another 19% (5/26). The remaining 62% (15/26) were genetically stable (MSS). MSI status (MSS, MSI-L, and MSI-H) was not associated with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (P = 0.088; Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: Epigenetic silencing of the DNA repair gene MLH1 by promoter hypermethylation is a frequent event in retinoblastoma. The results showed that somatic genetic changes involving MSI occur in a subset of retinoblastoma and implicated the presence of a defective DNA mismatch repair pathway resulting in MSI in retinoblastoma.

Outcome following initial external beam radiotherapy in patients with Reese-Ellsworth group Vb retinoblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: To describe patient and ocular outcomes following initial treatment with external beam radiotherapy (EBT) in eyes with Reese-Ellsworth group Vb retinoblastoma. METHODS: Retrospective case series (from January 1, 1979, to February 28, 2002). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival (ocular and patient) and incidence (second cancer) data. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-three patients with 1 or more Reese-Ellsworth group Vb eyes were identified. Of 284 group Vb eyes, 63 (22.2%) initially received EBT, vs 172 (60.6%) that were initially enucleated. Of the 63 radiated group Vb eyes, 31 (49.2%) had no further tumor growth, 26 (41.3%) developed a recurrence, and 8 (12.7%) developed a new tumor. Of the 63 radiated group Vb eyes, 33 (52.4%) developed ocular complications. The ocular survival rate of radiated group Vb eyes was 81.4% at 1 year and 53.4% at 10 years. Twenty-eight radiated group Vb eyes survived to the last follow-up with visual acuity information. Thirteen patients developed second cancers, 11 in the field of radiation. The probability of developing a second cancer following initial EBT for group Vb disease in patients with bilateral disease was 29.7% by 10 years after diagnosis. Survival from second cancers in patients with bilateral disease initially receiving EBT for group Vb disease was 93.6% at 5 years and 52.6% at 18(1/4) years. No patient with unilateral disease developed a second cancer. Deaths due to metastatic retinoblastoma were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study focusing exclusively on group Vb eyes treated initially with EBT, most of which were salvaged with vision. Outcome data provided herein are clinically relevant when choosing treatment options for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma.

Chorioretinal scar growth after 810-nanometer laser treatment for retinoblastoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the extent of expansion of laser scars after single treatment with transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) for retinoblastoma. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed medical records and RetCam (Massie Industries, Dublin, CA) digital fundus photographs of patients with retinoblastoma who received TTT by use of an 810-nm diode laser with large-spot indirect ophthalmoscope. Digital images were measured by use of RetCam software beginning immediately after treatment. Lesions were measured in both linear size and area by 2 observers. In addition, optic disc diameters were also measured for each image. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 9 patients with hereditary retinoblastoma who were treated from 1997 to 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Linear and area expansion of laser scars as a function of time. RESULTS: Fourteen tumors in 10 eyes were treated successfully with 1 session of TTT. Follow-up for all eyes was at least 16 months. Scars of 12 of the 14 lesions increased beyond their original borders (mean starting linear diameter, 2.02 mm; range 1.46-2.59 mm; mean increase, 0.72 mm [36%]) over time, most within 6 months to 1 year after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Scars from TTT for retinoblastoma may increase in size after treatment. This expansion must be considered when applying TTT to tumors near vital macular structures, such as the fovea and optic nerve.

(Neonatal) retinoblastoma in the first month of life.

OBJECTIVES: To identify patients with retinoblastoma whose conditions were diagnosed at the age of 1 month or younger and to describe their clinical features (including ocular and patient survival) and the development of second nonocular tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 1831 patients. The cumulative incidence of second cancer development was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were identified as having a diagnosis of retinoblastoma at the age of 1 month or younger (mean age, 18.5 days). Family history (31 patients [67%]) exceeded leukocoria (6 patients [13%]) as the most common reason for detection. Twenty-six (56%) of the 46 patients were seen with unilateral retinoblastoma, with 22 ultimately developing cancer in the fellow eye. At the initial diagnosis, 81 (85%) of the 95 tumors were detected in zones 1 and 2. Eighty-two (93%) of the 88 subsequent tumors were located in zones 2 and 3. In the 26 patients who had unilateral retinoblastoma, 16 of the initially affected eyes and 21 of the fellow eyes were salvaged. In the 19 (44%) of 20 patients who were seen initially with bilateral retinoblastomas, 31 (82%) of the 38 eyes were salvaged. The mean follow-up was 10.9 years. The incidence of second nonocular cancers reached 54% by 23.7 years for the patients who received radiation therapy, while the incidence was 0% for the patients who did not. Four (8.7%) of the 46 patients developed metastatic disease and died; 3 of these patients had documented metastases in the first month of life (one at birth). CONCLUSIONS: The most common manifesting sign of children diagnosed as having retinoblastoma in the first month of life is family history. Eyes with Reese-Ellsworth group I retinoblastomas were the most common. In patients with bilateral and unilateral retinoblastoma, new (subsequent) ocular tumors developed in a centrifugal pattern. Despite an early diagnosis, patients' eyes came to enucleation, and metastatic disease and death occurred from ocular metastases. In patients who received radiation therapy, the probability of developing second nonocular cancer is 54% by 23.7 years; no second cancers developed in patients who did not receive radiation therapy.