SOP- habituation laboratory: An interactive tool for simulating the basic behavioral features of habituation.

This paper presents an open-source online tool for introducing psychology students to the major theoretical and empirical facts of habituation. The tool was designed in a way that combines theory and data through simulated experiments. The simulations exemplify how the priming theory of Allan R. Wagner accounts for the set of behavioral characteristics of habituation proposed by Richard F. Thompson and W. Alden Spencer in 1966. Through this interactive platform, the user can learn the basics of the theory and examine how it accounts for the empirical facts with different parameters. Instructions and commands are provided in three languages: English, Spanish, and Portuguese.

A Quantitative Account of the Behavioral Characteristics of Habituation: The Sometimes Opponent Processes Model of Stimulus Processing.

Habituation is defined as a decline in responding to a repeated stimulus. After more than 80 years of research, there is an enduring consensus among researchers on the existence of 9-10 behavioral regularities or parameters of habituation. There is no similar agreement, however, on the best approach to explain these facts. In this paper, we demonstrate that the Sometimes Opponent Processes (SOP) model of stimulus processing accurately describes all of these regularities. This model was proposed by Allan Wagner as a quantitative elaboration of priming theory, which states that the processing of a stimulus, and therefore its capacity to provoke its response, depends inversely on the degree to which the stimulus is pre-represented in short-term memory. Using computer simulations, we show that all the facts involving within-session effects or short-term habituation might be the result of priming from recent presentations of the stimulus (self-generated priming). The characteristics involving between-sessions effects or long-term habituation would result from the retrieval of the representation of the stimulus from memory by the associated context (associatively generated priming).

Especificidad contextual diferencial en la habituación de las respuestas de parpadeo y aceleración cardiaca en humanos / Differential Context-Specificity in the Habituation of the Eyeblink and Cardiac Responses in Humans

Wagner (1978) propuso que la habituación, definida como una disminución en la respuesta a un estímulo que se repite, dependería de la formación de una asociación entre el contexto y el estímulo. Según este enfoque, la habituación debería ser contexto-específica, es decir, la respuesta habituada en un contexto debería deshabituarse al presentar el estímulo en un contexto novedoso. Esta hipótesis fue examinada a través de un experimento donde se sometió a un grupo de estudiantes a una sesión de habituación consistente en 60 repeticiones de un estímulo provocador de reacciones de parpadeo y aceleración cardiaca. Posteriormente, en una sesión de prueba se midió la amplitud de estas respuestas, presentando el estímulo en el mismo contexto (Grupo Igual) o en un contexto distinto a aquel donde ocurrió la habituación (Grupo Diferente). Los resultados de la prueba arrojaron evidencia de especificidad contextual diferencial para ambas respuestas, ya que la respuesta de aceleración cardiaca resultó disminuida en el grupo igual pero no en el grupo diferente (revelando especificidad), mientras que la respuesta de parpadeo estuvo igualmente disminuida en ambos grupos (revelando ausencia de especificidad). Estos hallazgos confirman observaciones previas con ratas que demuestran que el control contextual de la habituación depende de la naturaleza de la respuesta.

Wagner (1978) proposed that habituation, defined as a decrease in responding to a repeated stimulus, would depend on the formation of an association between the stimulus and the context. According to this approach, habitua-tion should be context-specific; that is, a response that was habituated in a given context should dishabituate when the stimulus is presented in a novel context. This hypothesis was examined in an experiment in which a group of students received a habituation session consisting of 60 repetitions of a stimulus capable of evoking eyeblink and heart-rate acceleration reactions. Subsequently, in a testing session the amplitude of these responses was examined by presenting the stimulus in the same context used in the habituation session (Group Same) or in an alternative context (Group Different). The results provided evidence of differential context-specificity for the two responses, since the heart-rate acceleration response was diminished in the group same but not in the group different (revealing specificity), while the eyeblink response was diminished in both groups (revealing no specificity). These findings are consistent with previous observations in rats demonstrating that the contextual control of habituation depends on the nature of the measured response.