Note on dose conversion for radon exposure.

The epidemiological approach to converting radon exposure to effective dose is examined. Based on the definition of the effective dose, the dose conversion is obtained from the equivalence of lung-specific detriment associated with low-LET radiation and with radon exposure. This approach most reliably estimates effective dose per radon exposure on the basis of epidemiological data and implicitly includes the radiation weighting factor required to calculate the effective dose from radon exposure using the dosimetric approach, applying biokinetic and dosimetric models. Consistency between the results of the epidemiological and dosimetric approaches is achieved by using a radiation weighting factor of about 10 for alpha particles instead of the current ICRP value of 20. In contrast, the epidemiological approach implemented in ICRP 65, and referred to as dose conversion convention, was based on direct comparison of total radiation detriment with lung detriment from radon exposure. With the revision of radiation detriments in ICRP 103, this approach can be judged to overestimate the effective dose per radon exposure by about a factor of two because the tissue weighting factor for lung differs from the value of relative detriment to which it relates.

Study on the radiation detriment.

Cancer incidence risks, lifetime effects and radiation detriments are determined for the whole population and various subpopulations as a result of acute and chronic exposure to low-LET radiation, taking into account the risk models, procedures and representative populations provided by ICRP. The results are given for solid cancers in different organs, as well as for soft tissue cancer in bone marrow. For most cancer sites a good agreement is obtained between the results of this study and the values published by the ICRP. The agreement with ICRP values is better for the whole population than for the working age population, where the results are systematically elevated. For chronic exposure, the years of life lost per radiation-induced cancer incidence are generally higher. In particular, this results in a radiation detriment for the whole population that is 30% higher than for acute exposure. The study reveals that risk quantities show a pronounced age dependence. The highest radiation risks are attributed to young persons; the lowest to persons in advanced ages. The total detriment imposed on people in different ages varies by a factor of about 30. The average values provided by the ICRP mask these variations and considerably underestimate radiation risks in childhood and adolescence. This also concerns the determination of the effective dose for persons in these age groups. Unlike the ICRP, which provides different nominal detriments for the whole population and the working age population, the results of this study do not support the use of different detriments for these populations.

Low-Level Radon Activity Concentration-A MetroRADON International Intercomparison.

An international comparison of continuous monitors measuring radon activity concentration was performed to validate the traceability of the European radon calibration facilities. It was carried out by comparing the secondary standards used by these previous facilities, ranging from 100 Bq·m-3 to 300 Bq·m-3. Secondary standards were individually compared to a secondary reference device previously calibrated in a reference radon atmosphere traceable to a primary standard. The intercomparison was organized by the National Institute for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Protection (SUJCHBO) in the period from October 2019 to April 2020 within the European Metrology Program for Innovation and Research (EMPIR), JRP-Contract 16ENV10 MetroRADON. Eight European laboratories participated in this study. The results of the experiment are presented and discussed.

The Metrological Traceability, Performance and Precision of European Radon Calibration Facilities.

An interlaboratory comparison for European radon calibration facilities was conducted to evaluate the establishment of a harmonized quality level for the activity concentration of radon in air and to demonstrate the performance of the facilities when calibrating measurement instruments for radon. Fifteen calibration facilities from 13 different European countries participated. They represented different levels in the metrological hierarchy: national metrology institutes and designated institutes, national authorities for radiation protection and participants from universities. The interlaboratory comparison was conducted by the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) and took place from 2018 to 2020. Participants were requested to measure radon in atmospheres of their own facilities according to their own procedures and requirements for metrological traceability. A measurement device with suitable properties was used to determine the comparison values. The results of the comparison showed that the radon activity concentrations that were determined by European calibration facilities complying with metrological traceability requirements were consistent with each other and had common mean values. The deviations from these values were normally distributed. The range of variation of the common mean value was a measure of the degree of agreement between the participants. For exposures above 1000 Bq/m3, the variation was about 4% for a level of confidence of approximately 95% (k=2). For lower exposure levels, the variation increased to about 6%.