Short-Term Impact of Seizures and Mitigation Opportunities.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The burden of epilepsy is complex and consists of elements directly related to acute seizures as well as those associated with living with a chronic neurologic disorder. The purpose of this systematic review was to characterize short-term burdens of seizures and to explore the potential value of acute treatments to mitigate these burdens apart from reducing the risk of status epilepticus. RECENT FINDINGS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify articles published from January 1, 2017, to June 22, 2023, that described short-term burdens and acute treatments of seizures. Primary outcomes included those related to short-term burdens of seizures and the benefits of acute treatments to reduce short-term burdens. Of the 1332 articles identified through PubMed and 17 through other sources, 27 had relevant outcomes and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Seizure emergencies negatively affected short-term quality of life and the ability to conduct normal daily living activities and were associated with physical (injury) and financial (emergency transport, hospitalization) burdens. The use of acute treatment was associated with a rapid return (≤ 1 h) to normal function/self for both patients and caregivers and potentially lower healthcare utilization and costs. Seizure action plans may improve knowledge and comfort with seizure care, empowering patients and caregivers. The short-term burden of seizures can create a substantial negative impact on patients and caregivers. Acute treatments may reduce the short-term burdens of seizures in addition to their well-described role to reduce seizure activity and the risk for status epilepticus.

Characterizing transcriptomic responses to sediment stress across location and morphology in reef-building corals.

Anthropogenic activities increase sediment suspended in the water column and deposition on reefs can be largely dependent on colony morphology. Massive and plating corals have a high capacity to trap sediments, and active removal mechanisms can be energetically costly. Branching corals trap less sediment but are more susceptible to light limitation caused by suspended sediment. Despite deleterious effects of sediments on corals, few studies have examined the molecular response of corals with different morphological characteristics to sediment stress. To address this knowledge gap, this study assessed the transcriptomic responses of branching and massive corals in Florida and Hawai'i to varying levels of sediment exposure. Gene expression analysis revealed a molecular responsiveness to sediments across species and sites. Differential Gene Expression followed by Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis identified that branching corals had the largest transcriptomic response to sediments, in developmental processes and metabolism, while significantly enriched GO terms were highly variable between massive corals, despite similar morphologies. Comparison of DEGs within orthogroups revealed that while all corals had DEGs in response to sediment, there was not a concerted gene set response by morphology or location. These findings illuminate the species specificity and genetic basis underlying coral susceptibility to sediments.

Taking a Newer, Faster, Intranasal Route: A Narrative Review of Transitioning to a Less-Invasive Rescue Treatment for Seizure Clusters.

In the US, 3 rescue treatment options are approved for patients with seizure clusters (ie, acute repetitive seizures), which are intermittent increases of seizure activity. This narrative PubMed review of these 3 treatments examines newer intranasal options that are well suited for adolescent and adult patients who may desire a transition from rectal treatment. Diazepam rectal gel is indicated for patients ≥2 years, diazepam nasal spray for those ≥6 years, and midazolam nasal spray for those ≥12 years. Approvals for diazepam rectal gel and midazolam nasal spray were based on safety and efficacy comparisons with placebo. Approval for diazepam nasal spray was based on results from long-term safety and tolerability studies in addition to its comparable bioavailability to diazepam rectal gel, while also showing less interpatient variability. The safety profiles of diazepam rectal gel and nasal spray are similar, and the medications share safety, warning, and precaution labeling. Thus, patients ≥6 years could be introduced to intranasal diazepam, allowing for continuity of familiar treatment while improving access and comfort. Intranasal midazolam also has a well-characterized safety profile. A proxy for effectiveness is the number of seizure clusters that were treated with a single dose, and these differed in separate, noncomparative studies. The safety and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray have been examined in multiple subpopulations, whereas patient/caregiver experiences with both approved intranasal formulations have been characterized. Users may prefer nasal administration because it is noninvasive and effective, and provides social advantages, comfort, ease of use, and less variability compared with rectal gel. Nasal sprays are portable and convenient for use in the community (school, work, travel), and self-administration was reported in one study, with patients as young as 11 years old self-administering diazepam nasal spray. These newer, intranasal rescue treatments for seizure clusters provide an alternative to the rectal route.

Greater need for treatment optimization in patients with epilepsy initiating adjunctive therapy: Results of a retrospective claims analysis of antiseizure medication drug load in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective, observational study used US claims data to assess changes in antiseizure medication (ASM) drug load for a cohort of patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of epilepsy (ICD-10 code G40.xxx) who started new adjunctive ASM treatment with one of 4 branded (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, perampanel) or 4 unbranded (carbamazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate) ASMs between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 were identified from IBM MarketScan® research databases (primary study population). Patients must have been continuously enrolled 360 days before the start of the new ASM (eligibility period). Follow-up was from the start of new ASM until Day 540 (∼18 months). The primary endpoint was concomitant ASM drug load, which included all ASMs except the new (comparator) ASM. A sensitivity analysis population included adults with epilepsy who were continuously enrolled for ≥ 180 days during at least one calendar year in the study period (2016-2020), whether or not the comparator ASM was new or existing during that period. Total ASM drug load, which included comparator ASM and concomitant ASMs, was assessed in the sensitivity analysis population. RESULTS: In total, 21,332 patients were included in the primary study population, of which 5767 initiated branded ASMs and 15,565 initiated unbranded ASMs. A total of 392,426 patients were included in the sensitivity analysis population during at least one calendar year 2016-2020. Concomitant ASM drug load increased in the 360 days prior to new ASM start and slightly declined thereafter. Mean concomitant ASM drug load for the primary population was 1.6 (SD 1.8) at new ASM start. Concomitant drug load was higher among those starting branded ASM comparators compared to those starting unbranded comparators. Mean total ASM drug load for patients increased over time and was approximately double for patients exposed to branded ASMs (mean range 2.1 to 2.7) compared to that of patients exposed to any unbranded ASM (mean range 1.0 to 1.3). CONCLUSION: Concomitant ASM drug load increased prior to addition of new ASM, with higher increases observed among patients starting branded vs unbranded ASMs, followed by slight decreases thereafter. Total drug load increased linearly among all patients. These findings underscore the need for ongoing ASM regimen evaluation and treatment optimization in patients with epilepsy.

Rapid Rescue Treatment with Diazepam Nasal Spray Leads to Faster Seizure Cluster Termination in Epilepsy: An Exploratory Post Hoc Cohort Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Although prompt treatment of status epilepticus is standard of care, the effect of timing of rescue therapy administration for seizure clusters in epilepsy remains unknown. Seizure clusters are a rare but clinically important condition, and benzodiazepines are the cornerstone rescue therapy for seizure clusters in epilepsy. We characterized temporal patterns from a large dataset of treated seizure clusters in the safety study of diazepam nasal spray. METHODS: This post hoc analysis used timing data of treated seizure clusters recorded by care partners and patients in seizure diaries during a 1-year safety study. Data analysis used time from seizure start to administration of diazepam. RESULTS: From 4466 observations, 3225 had data meeting criteria for analysis. Overall, median times from seizure start to dose administration, dose administration to seizure termination, and total seizure duration were 2, 3, and 7 min, respectively. In seizure clusters treated in < 5 min (median 1.0 min), median time from dose to seizure termination was 2.0 min, and median total seizure duration was 4.0 min. Among seizure clusters treated in ≥ 5 min (median 10.0 min), median time to seizure termination was 10.0 min, and median total seizure duration was 23.0 min. Previously published safety results reported that over a mean participation of 1.5 years, 82.2% of patients had ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) irrespective of relationship to treatment, including 30.7% with serious TEAEs; 18.4% had TEAEs deemed at least possibly related to the study drug, none of which were serious. There were no events of cardiorespiratory depression. CONCLUSION: Echoing the importance of early use of benzodiazepines in status epilepticus, the findings from this exploratory analysis of patients with refractory epilepsy and frequent seizure clusters identify a potential benefit of early diazepam nasal spray treatment leading to faster seizure resolution within the seizure cluster. Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02721069 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02721069 ).

Some people with epilepsy who take daily antiseizure drugs might still have seizures. Some of these seizures may be emergencies that can be treated with rescue medicine. For status epilepticus, rescue treatment should be given as soon as this seizure emergency is recognized. Seizure clusters are rare and might also become emergencies, but until now it had not been clear if earlier treatment would be better. Diazepam nasal spray is a rescue medicine approved to treat seizure clusters. The report used data from a study of the safety of diazepam nasal spray in people needing treatment ≥ 6 times a year. We looked at the time the seizure in a seizure cluster started to the time rescue treatment was given. We also looked at the time from taking rescue treatment to the time when that specific seizure stopped. For some seizure clusters, rescue medicine was given in < 5 min after the seizure started; on average, these seizures stopped within 2 min after rescue treatment. The total time from the start of the seizure in the seizure cluster to when it stopped was 4 min. In contrast, for seizure clusters treated after 5 min, the seizures stopped in an average of 10 min after treatment. Overall, these seizures lasted 23 min. In conclusion, this analysis found that seizures in a seizure cluster ended more quickly when diazepam nasal spray was given sooner. These findings are suggestive that select patients and caregivers should not wait to treat a seizure cluster once it has been identified.

Dose reduction and discontinuation of concomitant antiseizure medications after initiating cenobamate: A retrospective review.

This retrospective chart review examined dose reductions and discontinuations of concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) following cenobamate initiation and maintenance in patients with epilepsy treated at MetroHealth (Cleveland, OH) between 9/1/2020-9/26/2022. Concomitant ASM dose adjustments and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Efficacy (100 % seizure reduction) was examined among patients who received cenobamate for ≥ 3 months at data cutoff (including titration). As of 9/26/2022, 95 patients received cenobamate (mean age, 45.9 years; 48.4 % female, median exposure 7.5 months). Five patients (5.3 %) discontinued (n = 1 withdrawal by patient; n = 1 noncompliance; n = 3 adverse event). Among the 90 patients taking cenobamate at data cutoff, 50 % (45/90) discontinued ≥ 1 concomitant ASM, most commonly clobazam (n = 18), levetiracetam (n = 10), and phenytoin (n = 7); 21 patients (23.3 %) had additional concomitant ASM dose reductions, most commonly phenytoin (n = 6) and clobazam (n = 4). Sixteen patients received cenobamate monotherapy. Among 79 patients who received cenobamate for ≥ 3 months at data cutoff, 51.9 % (41/79) were seizure-free for ≥ 3 months. Of the 41 seizure-free patients, 58.5 % (24/41) were taking 100 mg/day of cenobamate. Sixteen of the 95 cenobamate-treated patients (16.8 %) reported 22 TEAEs. The most common TEAE was fatigue (n = 7). These data suggest that cenobamate therapy may allow reduction or elimination of polytherapy in some patients.

Acute seizure therapies in people with epilepsy: Fact or fiction? A U.S. Perspective.

Patients with epilepsy (PWE) may experience seizure emergencies including acute repetitive seizures despite chronic treatment with daily antiseizure medications. Seizures may adversely impact routine daily activities and/or healthcare utilization and may impair the quality of life of patients with epilepsy and their caregivers. Seizures often occur at home, school, or work in a community setting. Appropriate treatment that is readily accessible for patients with seizure urgencies and emergencies is essential outside the hospital setting. When determining the best acute antiseizure therapy for PWE, clinicians need to consider all of the available rescue medications and their routes of administration including the safety and efficacy profiles. Benzodiazepines are a standard of care as a rescue therapy, yet there are several misconceptions about their use and safety. Reevaluating potential misconceptions and formulating best practices are necessary to maximize usage for each available option of acute therapy. We examine common beliefs associated with traditional use of acute seizure therapies to refute or support them based on the current level of evidence in the published literature.

Treatment of Seizure Clusters in Epilepsy: A Narrative Review on Rescue Therapies.

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder in the United States, affecting approximately 1.2% of the population. Some people with epilepsy may experience seizure clusters, which are acute repetitive seizures that differ from the person's usual seizure pattern. Seizure clusters are unpredictable, are emotionally burdensome to patients and caregivers (including care partners), and require prompt treatment to prevent progression to serious outcomes, including status epilepticus and associated morbidity (e.g., lacerations, fractures due to falls) and mortality. Rescue medications for community use can be administered to terminate a seizure cluster, and benzodiazepines are the cornerstone of rescue treatment. Despite the effectiveness of benzodiazepines and the importance of a rapid treatment approach, as many as 80% of adult patients do not use rescue medication to treat seizure clusters. This narrative review provides an update on rescue medications used for treatment of seizure clusters, with an emphasis on clinical development and study programs for diazepam rectal gel, midazolam nasal spray, and diazepam nasal spray. Results from long-term clinical trials have shown that treatments for seizure clusters are effective. Intranasal benzodiazepines provide ease of use and patient and caregiver satisfaction in pediatric and adult patients. Adverse events attributed to acute rescue treatments have been characterized as mild to moderate, and no reports of respiratory depression have been attributed to treatment in long-term safety studies. The implementation of an acute seizure action plan to facilitate optimal use of rescue medications provides an opportunity for improved management of seizure clusters, allowing those affected to resume normal daily activities more quickly.

Some people with epilepsy who take antiseizure medications may still have seizures. These seizures might happen in clusters. Seizure clusters are emergencies that need to be treated quickly to lower the risk of status epilepticus and hospitalization. Also, these clusters can be stressful. Approved rescue medications are diazepam rectal gel, midazolam nasal spray, and diazepam nasal spray. They can all be used by family and other caregivers, and nasal sprays may be preferred in a public setting. All of these treatments can be used for adults, but each has a different age limit for children. Overall, these therapies are underused; however, all have been shown to work in stopping seizure clusters and have mild to moderate side effects. Nasal treatments offer ease of use and satisfaction for patients and caregivers (care partners). However, data for some effects and patient groups are not available for all treatments. Seizure action plans are designed to give step-by-step instructions about when and how to use rescue medication. Increased use of action plans may improve at-home treatment of seizure clusters and allow patients to perform their normal daily activities and avoid injury or hospitalizations.

Acute Abortive Therapies for Seizure Clusters in Long-Term Care.

OBJECTIVES: To describe acute seizure treatment for the long-term care setting, emphasizing rescue (acute abortive) medications for on-site management of acute unexpected seizures and seizure clusters. DESIGN: Narrative review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: People with seizures in long-term care, including group residences. METHODS: PubMed was searched using keywords that pertained to rescue medications, seizure emergencies/epilepsy, seizure action plans, and long-term care. RESULTS: Seizure disorder, including epilepsy, is prevalent in long-term care residences, and rescue medications can be used for on-site treatment. Diazepam rectal gel, intranasal midazolam, and diazepam nasal spray are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved seizure-cluster rescue medications, and intravenous diazepam and lorazepam are approved for status epilepticus. Benzodiazepines differ by formulation, route of administration, absorption, and metabolism. Intranasal formulations are easy and ideal for public use and when rectal treatment is challenging (eg, wheelchair). Intranasal, intrabuccal, and rectal formulations do not require specialized training to administer and are easier for staff at all levels of training compared with intravenous treatment. Off-label rescue medications may have anecdotal support; however, potential disadvantages include variable absorption and onset of action as well as potential risks to patients and caregivers or care partners. Delivery of intravenous-administered rescue medications is delayed by the time needed to set up and deliver the medication and is subject to dosing errors. Seizure action plans that include management of acute seizures can optimize the quality and timing of treatment, which may reduce emergency service needs and prevent progression to status epilepticus. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Seizure disorder is prevalent across all ages but is increased in older adults and in those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Prompt intervention may reduce negative outcomes associated with acute unexpected seizures and seizure clusters. Seizure action plans that include acute seizures can improve the treatment response by detailing the necessary information for staff to provide immediate treatment.

Electrocorticography Analysis in Patients With Dual Neurostimulators Supports Desynchronization as a Mechanism of Action for Acute Vagal Nerve Stimulator Stimulation.

PURPOSE: Both vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS System) are treatment options for medically refractory focal epilepsy. The mechanism of action of both devices remains poorly understood. Limited prior evidence suggests that acute VNS stimulation may reduce epileptiform activity and cause EEG desynchronization on electrocorticography (ECoG). Our study aims to isolate effects of VNS on ECoG as recorded by RNS System in patients who have both devices, by comparing ECoG samples with and without acute VNS stimulation. METHODS: Ten 60-second ECoGs each from 22 individuals at 3 epilepsy centers were obtained-5 ECoGs with VNS "off" and 5 ECoGs with VNS "on." Electrocorticograps containing seizures or loss of telemetry connection artifact were excluded from analysis (total of 169 ECoGs were included). Electrocorticographs were analyzed for differences in spectral content by generating average spectrograms for "on" and "off" states and using a linear mixed-effects model to isolate effects of VNS stimulation. RESULTS: Acute VNS stimulation reduced average power in the theta band by 4.9%, beta band by 3.8%, and alpha band by 2.5%. The reduction in theta power reached statistical significance with a P value of <0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide evidence that acute VNS stimulation results in desynchronization of specific frequency bands (salient decrease in theta and beta bands, smaller decrease in alpha band) in ECoGs recorded by the RNS device in patients with dual (VNS and RNS) neurostimulators. This finding offers support for desynchronization as a theorized mechanism of action of VNS. Further research may lead to future improved neurostimulator efficacy by informing optimal stimulation programming parameters.

Introduction to use of an acute seizure action plan for seizure clusters and guidance for implementation.

It is important for patients with epilepsy and their caregivers, including care partners, to understand the patient's seizure clusters and what to do when they occur. In many instances, seizure clusters are unique to each patient. The knowledge gained from understanding a patient's seizure cluster or seizure pattern provides a foundation for taking prompt action to prevent worsening to prolonged seizures, status epilepticus, and potentially death. Seizure action plans (SAPs), which are similar to the disease-related treatment action plans for other conditions, can be developed by a health care provider (HCP) in conjunction with the patient with epilepsy and/or caregivers, and SAPs are specifically customized for the individual patient and his or her seizure management. However, the current literature lacks unified guidance on how to design SAPs that will help prepare patients and caregivers for rapidly determining and initiating appropriate treatment of acute seizure emergencies in the community and at home. Here, we examine the current usage and value of SAPs for pediatric and adult patients with epilepsy, and we introduce the concept of the acute SAP (ASAP) for use specifically during seizure emergencies, such as seizure clusters. This type of standardized, simplified, and customized plan can rapidly and concisely provide patients and caregivers with a practical protocol to treat a seizure cluster consistently, appropriately, and in a timely manner. Details on potential content and formats of ASAPs are provided. Following this is a discussion of barriers to ASAP use that may affect HCPs or patients and caregivers, including lack of standardization, relevance, and personalization and pitfalls associated with technology. This leads into a discussion of guidance for developing, implementing, and updating ASAPs that suggests ways to address the barriers and ensure that the ASAP is best suited to the patient's needs.

Concurrent brain-responsive and vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator, RNS® System (RNS), excluded patients with a vagus nerve stimulator, VNS® System (VNS). The goal of this study was to evaluate seizure outcomes and safety of concurrent RNS and VNS stimulation in adults with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter chart review was performed on all patients with an active VNS and RNS who were treated for a minimum of 6 months with both systems concurrently. Frequency of disabling seizures at baseline before RNS, at 1 year after RNS placement, and at last follow-up were used to calculate the change in seizure frequency after treatment. Data on adverse events and complications related to each device were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients from 10 epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. All but one patient received RNS after VNS. The median follow-up time after RNS implantation was 28 months. Analysis of the entire population of patients with active VNS and RNS systems revealed a median reduction in seizure frequency at 1 year post-RNS placement of 43% with a responder rate of 49%, and at last follow-up a 64% median reduction with a 67% responder rate. No negative interactions were reported from the concurrent use of VNS and RNS. Stimulation-related side-effects were reported more frequently in association with VNS (30%) than with RNS (2%). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that concurrent treatment with VNS and RNS is safe and that the addition of RNS to VNS can further reduce seizure frequency.