Consistent scholarship standards among DNP-prepared faculty needed: Actionable insights.

DNP-prepared faculty report challenges and barriers to achieving success in academic roles when criteria for promotion includes scholarship. The purpose of this evidence-based initiative was to explore thoughtful scholarship standards for DNP-prepared faculty which can be adapted and transferred across academic institutions with the goal of elevating faculty scholarship. Given a paucity of available research evidence, a review and synthesis of non-research evidence was conducted. DNP scholarship standards from high-ranking intuitions were critically appraised, and this evidence, along with the diverse and collective expertise of the authors, was translated into recommendations for an inclusive model of rigor for DNP-prepared faculty scholarship. A template for appraising the scholarship of DNP-prepared faculty based on strategic evaluation of impact is included. Academic institutions may use this work to expand the fundamental level of evolving scholarship, determine parameters, and provide clarity and support to DNP-prepared faculty as they seek to progress in rank.

The Association Between Magnet ® Recognition and Patient Outcomes : A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews have explored nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes in Magnet®-recognized hospitals compared with non-Magnet hospitals, yet these did not comprehensively review a wide variety of patient outcomes. AIM: The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the findings from published research evaluating patient outcomes in Magnet-recognized hospitals compared with non-Magnet hospitals. METHODS: A medical librarian conducted a systematic search for published peer-reviewed, English-language literature and a search of the reference lists for retrieved publications to identify articles addressing Magnet compared with non-Magnet hospitals related to patient outcomes. RESULTS: Four patient outcomes improved in Magnet-designated hospitals: mortality, patient satisfaction, failure to rescue, and falls. Four patient outcomes showed undesirable or mixed outcomes. Five patient outcomes had insufficient evidence regarding patient outcomes when treated at Magnet-recognized hospitals. CONCLUSION: Magnet Recognition® is associated with improvement in a distinct set of patient outcomes, but not all key outcome measures. Standardized outcomes and rigorous study designs are needed to further explore the impact of Magnet Recognition on a wide variety of patient outcomes.

The state of mental health, burnout, mattering and perceived wellness culture in Doctorally prepared nursing faculty with implications for action.

BACKGROUND: Depression, anxiety, and burnout are an epidemic in the nursing profession. Unlike nurses in clinical settings, little is known about the mental health of doctorally prepared nursing faculty in academic settings, especially when separated by degree type (Doctor of Philosophy in Nursing [PhD] vs. Doctor of Nursing Practice [DNP]) and clinical or tenure track. AIMS: The study aims were to: (1) describe the current rate of depression, anxiety, and burnout in PhD and DNP-prepared nursing faculty and tenure and clinical faculty across the United States; (2) determine if differences exist in mental health outcomes between PhD and DNP-prepared faculty and tenure and clinical faculty; (3) explore whether wellness culture and mattering to the organization influence faculty mental health outcomes; and (4) gain insight into faculty's perceptions of their roles. METHODS: An online descriptive correlational survey design was used with doctorally prepared nursing faculty across the U.S. The survey was distributed to faculty by nursing deans and included: demographics; valid and reliable scales for depression, anxiety, and burnout; an assessment of wellness culture and mattering; and an open-ended question. Descriptive statistics described mental health outcomes; Cohen's d was used to determine effect sizes between PhD and DNP faculty for the mental health outcomes; and Spearman's correlations tested associations among depression, anxiety, burnout, mattering, and workplace culture. RESULTS: PhD (n = 110) and DNP (n = 114) faculty completed the survey; 70.9% of PhD faculty and 35.1% of DNP faculty were tenure track. A small effect size (0.22) was found, with more PhDs (17.3%) screening positive for depression than DNPs (9.6%). No differences were observed between tenure and clinical track. Higher perceptions of mattering and workplace culture were associated with less depression, anxiety, and burnout. Identified contributions to mental health outcomes yielded five themes: lack of appreciation, role concerns, time for scholarship, burnout cultures, and faculty preparation for teaching. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Urgent action must be taken by college leaders to correct system issues contributing to suboptimal mental health in both faculty and students. Academic organizations need to build wellness cultures and provide infrastructures that offer evidence-based interventions to support faculty well-being.