Continued benefit demonstrated with BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis in previously treated children with severe haemophilia A: Interim analysis from the LEOPOLD Kids extension study.

INTRODUCTION: BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry®), a recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product, was efficacious and well tolerated in paediatric previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A for ≥50 exposure days (EDs) in the LEOPOLD Kids study. Because long-term prophylaxis (≥100 EDs) can provide substantial patient benefits, FVIII products should demonstrate long-term safety and efficacy. AIM: To demonstrate long-term (≥100 EDs) efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 in paediatric PTPs. METHODS: PTPs aged ≤12 years with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors could continue in the ongoing open-label extension study after completing ≥50 EDs in the LEOPOLD Kids main study. Patients received BAY 81-8973 for prophylaxis (25-50 IU/kg ≥2×/week), bleed treatment, and surgery. Bleeds were documented in electronic patient diaries. Inhibitor development was monitored every 6 months. RESULTS: At the August 2017 interim data cutoff, 46 patients (median [range] age at enrolment, 6.0 [1.0-11.0] years) had spent a median (range) of 602.5 (148-1069) EDs and 4.6 (1.0-5.9) years in the main plus extension studies. Median (quartile [Q]1; Q3) annualised bleeding rate for bleeds within 48 h after a prophylaxis infusion and total bleeds was 1.0 (0.2; 1.9) and 2.0 (0.4; 3.6), respectively. Most (>94%) bleeds were mild or moderate; 71.8% were treated with ≤1 infusion. BAY 81-8973 was also well tolerated with only one treatment-related adverse event (transient, low-titre inhibitor which did not require treatment adjustment). CONCLUSION: BAY 81-8973 was efficacious for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds during >4.5 years in paediatric PTPs with severe haemophilia A.

BAY 81-8973 demonstrated efficacy, safety and joint status improvement in patients with severe haemophilia A in the LEOPOLD I extension for ≤2 years.

OBJECTIVES: BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry® ), a full-length, unmodified, recombinant human factor VIII, provided excellent bleeding control for patients with haemophilia A in the pivotal 1-year LEOPOLD I trial. The LEOPOLD I extension evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis. METHODS: After completing LEOPOLD I, patients continued receiving 20-50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 two- or three-times weekly in the extension. Outcomes included annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and haemostasis during surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients aged 12-65 years participated in the extension. Median (range) exposure days during the 2-year total study period was 309 (115-355). No patient switched regimens. Median (Q1; Q3) ABR for all bleeds was 2.0 (1.0; 6.1) during the pivotal study, 2.0 (0.0; 5.2) during the extension, and 2.0 (0.5; 5.5) combined. The proportion of joint bleeds affecting target joints decreased (pivotal study: 90.9%, extension: 60.0%). Haemostasis was assessed as excellent/good in all five major surgeries. One serious adverse event (myocardial infarction) occurred in a patient with cardiovascular risk factors. No patients developed inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis efficacy outcomes in the pivotal study were maintained or, in the case of joint protection, improved during the extension, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with previous experience.

Efficacy of standard prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with bayer's sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS) in Chinese children with severe hemophilia A.

In China, care of patients with severe hemophilia primarily involves insufficient dosing of on-demand treatment and secondary low-dose prophylaxis (10 IU/kg 2× /wk). We sought to evaluate 3× /wk, standard-dose prophylaxis with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII-FS; Bayer) compared with on-demand treatment in Chinese children with severe hemophilia A. Children and adolescents aged 2-16 years with severe hemophilia A, no inhibitors, and no prophylaxis for >6 consecutive months before study entry were eligible for this 24-week, interventional, sequential-treatment study. Patients received rFVIII-FS on demand for 12 weeks followed by a 12-week prophylaxis period (25 IU/kg 3× /wk). The primary efficacy endpoint was comparison of the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of all bleeds in the prophylaxis versus on-demand phase. Additional variables included ABR of joint bleeds, school attendance/activity, daily activity, and hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Thirty patients (median age, 12 years) were treated and analyzed. Compared with on-demand treatment, prophylaxis reduced median (quartile [Q1; Q3]) ABR of all bleeds (57.5 [44.5; 73.9] vs 0 [0; 4.0]) and joint bleeds (34.5 [26.1; 56.5] vs 0 [0; 4.0]). Median (range) total HJHS improved after both the prophylaxis and on-demand phases (8.0 [0-48.0] and 11.0 [0-55.0], respectively) compared with baseline (16.0 [0-56.0]). School attendance/activity and daily activity improved with prophylaxis versus on demand. No inhibitors or treatment-related adverse events were reported. In this first prospective, standard-dose, secondary prophylaxis study in China, rFVIII-FS prophylaxis reduced bleeding and improved health outcomes versus on-demand treatment in children with severe hemophilia A.

Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral direct inhibitor of factor Xa, with those of enoxaparin for extended thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, we assigned 4541 patients to receive either 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban once daily, beginning after surgery, or 40 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously once daily, beginning the evening before surgery, plus a placebo tablet or injection. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep-vein thrombosis (either symptomatic or detected by bilateral venography if the patient was asymptomatic), nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause at 36 days (range, 30 to 42). The main secondary efficacy outcome was major venous thromboembolism (proximal deep-vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death from venous thromboembolism). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 3153 patients were included in the superiority analysis (after 1388 exclusions), and 4433 were included in the safety analysis (after 108 exclusions). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 18 of 1595 patients (1.1%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 58 of 1558 patients (3.7%) in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk reduction, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 3.7; P<0.001). Major venous thromboembolism occurred in 4 of 1686 patients (0.2%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 33 of 1678 patients (2.0%) in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk reduction, 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.5; P<0.001). Major bleeding occurred in 6 of 2209 patients (0.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 2 of 2224 patients (0.1%) in the enoxaparin group (P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: A once-daily, 10-mg oral dose of rivaroxaban was significantly more effective for extended thromboprophylaxis than a once-daily, 40-mg subcutaneous dose of enoxaparin in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. The two drugs had similar safety profiles. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00329628.)