Endovascular treatment of primary M3 occlusion stroke in clinical practice: analysis of the German Stroke Registry.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment (ET) options for acute stroke due to distal middle cerebral artery occlusions are rapidly evolving, but data on outcome and safety are sparse. We therefore performed an analysis of patients undergoing ET for primary M3 occlusions in routine clinical practice in a nationwide registry. METHODS: Patients enrolled between 01/20 and 12/21 in the prospective, multicenter German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET) were screened for mechanical thrombectomy performed for primary M3 occlusion. We analyzed neurological deficit as measured by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), thrombectomy technique, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score of 2b-3) and functional outcome as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and 90 days. RESULTS: Out of 5574 patients, 11 patients (0.2%, median age 80 years, 54.5% female) underwent ET for primary M3 occlusion. All patients had pre-admission mRS ≤ 1, median NIHSS on admission was 8, and successful reperfusion was achieved in 6/11 patients (54.5%). While no vasospasm, dissection or perforation was reported, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2 patients (18.2%). Favorable outcome (mRS ≤ 2) was achieved in 6/11 patients (54.5%) at 90-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ET for primary M3 occlusions is rarely performed. While technically feasible, the procedure's potential benefits must be carefully weighed against its associated risks, including clinically relevant complications. Caution and further research is needed to optimize patient selection for this intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: GSR-ET; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03356392; Trial Registration Date: 11/29/2017.

Endovascular thrombectomy in young patients with stroke.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment (ET) is standard of care in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion, but data on ET in young patients remain limited. AIM: We aim to compare outcomes for young stroke patients undergoing ET in a matched cohort. METHODS: We analyzed patients from an observational multicenter cohort with acute ischemic stroke and ET, the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment trial. Baseline characteristics, procedural parameters, and functional outcome at 90 days were compared between young (<50 years) and older (⩾50 years) patients with and without nearest-neighbor 1:1 propensity score matching. RESULTS: Out of 6628 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with ET, 363 (5.5%) were young. Young patients differed with regard to prognostic outcome characteristics. Specifically, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission was lower (median 13, interquartile range (IQR) 8-17 vs. 15, IQR 9-19, p < 0.001), and prestroke dependence was less frequent (2.9% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001) than in older patients. Compared to a matched cohort of older patients, ET was faster (time from groin puncture to flow restoration, 35 vs. 45 min, p < 0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage was less frequent in young patients (10.0% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001). Good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) at 3 months was achieved more frequently in young patients (71.6% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.001), and overall mortality was lower (6.7% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.001). Among previously employed young patients (n = 177), 37.9% returned to work at 3-month follow-up, while 74.1% of the remaining patients were still undergoing rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Young stroke patients undergoing ET have better outcomes compared to older patients, even when matched for prestroke condition, comorbidities, and stroke severity. Hence, more liberal guidelines to perform ET for younger patients may have to be established by future studies.

Antithrombotic treatment and outcome after endovascular treatment and acute carotid artery stenting in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the mainstay of secondary prevention in ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in AF patients with large vessel occlusion stroke treated by endovascular therapy (ET) and acute carotid artery stenting (CAS), the optimal antithrombotic medication remains unclear. METHODS: This is a subgroup analysis of the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET), a prospective multicenter cohort of patients with large vessel occlusion stroke undergoing ET. Patients with AF and CAS during ET were included. We analyzed baseline and periprocedural characteristics, antithrombotic strategies and functional outcome at 90 days. RESULTS: Among 6635 patients in the registry, a total of 82 patients (1.2%, age 77.9 ± 8.0 years, 39% female) with AF and extracranial CAS during ET were included. Antithrombotic medication at admission, during ET, postprocedural and at discharge was highly variable and overall mortality in hospital (21%) and at 90 days (39%) was high. Among discharged patients (n = 65), most frequent antithrombotic regimes were dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, 37%), single APT + OAC (25%) and DAPT + OAC (20%). Comparing DAPT to single or dual APT + OAC, clinical characteristics at discharge were similar (median NIHSS 7.5 [interquartile range, 3-10.5] vs 7 [4-11], p = 0.73, mRS 4 [IQR 3-4] vs. 4 [IQR 3-5], p = 0.79), but 90-day mortality was higher without OAC (32 vs 4%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In AF patients who underwent ET and CAS, 90-day mortality was higher in patients not receiving OAC. REGISTRATION: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03356392.