Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes in patients who undergo vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for enlarged symptomatic uteri. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized study, 60 vaginal hysterectomies (study group) were compared with 59 abdominal hysterectomies (control group); all of the hysterectomies were performed for symptomatic uterine fibroids from January 1997 through December 2000. We excluded from the study the other common causes of hysterectomy such as prolapse, bleeding, adenomyosis, and endometrial or cervical carcinoma. In both groups, uterine weights ranged from 200 g to 1300 g. For enlarged uteri, vaginal hysterectomies were performed with the use of volume reduction techniques: Intramyometrial coring, corporal bisection, and morcellation. The evaluated parameters included patient age, weight, parity, uterine weight, operative time, blood loss, demand for analgesics, eventual surgical complications, length of admission, and hospital charges. The Mann-Whitney U test and chi(2) tests were applied for statistical analysis. Probability values of <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no major differences in patient age, weight, parity, and uterine weight between the two groups. Operative time was significantly lower for the vaginal route as compared with the abdominal route (86 minutes vs 102 minutes, P <.001). No intraoperative complications were noted both in the study and control groups or the control group. Surgical bleeding (expressed by hemoglobin loss) was not significantly different between the two groups. In the postoperative period, we found a higher incidence of fever (30.5% vs 16.6%, P <.05) and demand for analgesics (86% vs 66%, P <.05) in the abdominal group as compared with the vaginal group. Significant advantages of vaginal hysterectomy were a reduction in the hospital stay (3 days vs 4 days, P <.001) and cost. CONCLUSION: These results should lead to the choice of vaginal hysterectomy as a valid alternative to the abdominal hysterectomy, even for enlarged uteri.

[Perinatal morbidity and mortality in children born to mothers with gestational hypertension]. / Morbilità e mortalità perinatali in nati da madri affette da ipertensione gestazionale.

Gestational hypertension is a severe pathology leading to important maternal and neonatal effects. It represents one of the most important causes of maternal morbidity and contributes to a high percentage of perinatal mortality, determined by fetal hypoxia and especially by prematurity and low birth weight. To-date the only treatment offered in gestational hypertension remains delivery, which has to be scheduled regarding timing and method on the basis of the appearance of hypertension, of its severeness and maternal and fetal complications. To evaluate the clinical course and the presence of hypertensive risk factors, a clinical-epidemiological study was carried out on two groups of pregnant women: a group made up of 50 women with hypertension and a control group of 80 women in whom no gravidic pathology arose. We hence were able to reveal the risk factors associated with hypertension in pregnancy such as maternal age, nulliparity, and elevated body mass index. Regarding neonatal prognosis, we observed a higher incidence in premature birth (30th- to 38th week of gestational age) and the need for elective or urgent caesarean sections, with respect to the spontaneous deliveries observed in the control group. We also observed reduced weight of both placenta and the newborn in hypertensive mothers with significant statistical differences between the two groups (p < 0.001). Evaluation of neonatal data at birth showed lower Apgar indices at 1st and 5th minute from birth in the study group with a higher percentage of newborns transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit. We also observed a high percentage of still-births equal to 14% in the study group as opposed to the control group.

[Evaluation of the peripartum effects of 2 analgesics: meperidine and tramadol, used in labor]. / Valutazione degli effetti peripartum di due analgesici, meperidina e tramadolo, utilizzati in travaglio di parto.

The need for analgesia to overcome pain in labour is highly requested by women today. Various ways either non pharmachologic e.g. Emotional sustain, psycho-prophylactic preparation, yoga and hypnosis or pharmachologic such as epidural blockade or parenteral are used. Therefore in our study we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the two opioids usually used today in parenteral analgesia to reduce pain during labour: Tramadol and Meperidine. We studied two groups of patients each made up of 20 women in labour, all at term and with a physiologic course of pregnancy. 75 mg i.m. of Meperidine chloryhydrate were somministered in the first group while in the second group 100 mg i.m. of tramadol chloryhydrate were somministered. Various maternal, fetal and neonatal parameters were then monitored demonstrating--A moderate maternal analgesic effect in both drugs (evaluated through the analogic grading of pain). In the group to whom Meperidine was given, sedative effects on the mother were observed associated with respiratory depression in the newborn (the latter evaluated through the Apgar index at 1st and 5th minute of life and pH of the blood obtained at the umbilical cord. The data obtained permitted us to conclude that Tramadol in accordance to the obtained in literature gives an analogous analgesic effect, with better tolerability for the absence of collateral effects on the mother, fetus and newborn.

[Lavage of the birth canal with chlorhexidine: a new valid method for the prevention of perinatal infections]. / Il lavaggio del canale del parto con clorexidina: una nuova valida metodica di prevenzione delle infezioni perinatali.

Perinatal morbidity and mortality are due to various infective agents, mainly represented by beta-hemolytic group B Streptococcus. The perinatal disease related to this infection is distinguished in Early-onset, characterised by pneumonia and sepsis, and Late-onset which leads to sepsis, meningitis and pneumonia. Various strategies were therefore proposed to prevent transmission including immunisation and chemoprophylaxis. All these methods however present adverse effects and are most of all expensive to carry out. Taha et al. reported an interesting experience regarding the reduction of perinatal infections following the cleansing of the birth canal with a solution of Chlorhexidine 0.25% during labour (1996-1997). It seemed interesting for us to assess the applicability and efficacy of a new strategy of prophylaxis of perinatal infections in a Developing Country based on the association of two of the simple strategies proposed i.e.: cleansing the birth canal with chlorhexidine and chemoprophylaxis in cases with risk factors without culture screening. We studied two groups of patients: one in which cleansing of the birth canal was used and the second (control group) in which the old method already applied in the hospital (i.e. cleansing of the external genitals with Cetrimide 1%+ Chlorhexidine 0.1%) was carried out associated with antibiotic therapy when risk factors arose. We observed a total absence of neonatal mortality due to sepsis resulting from the association of the methods suggested even though the presence of sepsis evaluated through signs and symptoms like fever, poor feeding, apnoea or dyspnoea in newborns was similar in both groups.