Blastomycosis in immunocompromised patients.

Among the endemic mycoses, blastomycosis has been least often associated with disorders of immune function, but the data presented herein suggest that blastomycosis may occur more commonly in immunocompromised patients than was previously recognized. We have observed a marked increased in the number of immunocompromised patients with blastomycosis over the last 15 years, increasing from about 3% of patients seen between 1956 and 1977 to almost 24% patients seen between 1978 and 1991. The disease appears to be much more aggressive in immunocompromised than in normal hosts. Almost 30% of the patients in our series died secondary to blastomycosis, with most deaths occurring within 5 weeks following the diagnosis. Furthermore, almost one third of those patients who died of other causes had evidence of persistent blastomycosis at death. Multiple organ and central nervous system involvement were relatively common in this series. For these reasons, early and aggressive therapy with amphotericin B is indicated for most immunocompromised patients with blastomycosis. Oral therapy with an azole compound should probably be reserved for patients who have responded to a primary course of amphotericin B but who require additional or long-term suppressive therapy. Until more data are available, the newer azoles should be used with caution as primary therapy in immunocompromised patients with blastomycosis, and considered only in patients with limited disease and a stable underlying condition. Caring for the immunocompromised patient poses many diagnostic and therapeutic challenges to the clinician, and among those patients who have been exposed to areas endemic for blastomycosis, B. dermatitidis must be regarded as a potentially important opportunistic pathogen.

Activities of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against rapidly growing mycobacteria with demonstration of acquired resistance following single-drug therapy.

The susceptibility to ciprofloxacin of 548 clinical isolates of rapidly growing mycobacteria belonging to eight subgroups or species was determined. The 170 isolates of Mycobacterium fortuitum biovar.fortuitum were most susceptible; the MIC for 90% of the organisms was 0.125 micrograms/ml. The other biovariants of M. fortuitum, M. smegmatis, and the M. chelonae-like organisms were less susceptible; the modal MIC was 0.5 micrograms/ml, and the MIC for 90% of organisms was 1.0 micrograms/ml. The two subspecies of M. chelonae were generally resistant, with only 8% of 206 isolates falling in the moderately susceptible category (MIC, 2 micrograms/ml) and only 2% falling in the susceptible category (MIC, less than or equal to 1 micrograms/ml). MICs of ofloxacin averaged 1 to 2 dilutions higher than those of ciprofloxacin for all subgroups tested. Three patients with M. fortuitum cutaneous disease relapsed after an initial response to therapy with ciprofloxacin, and their isolate was shown to have acquired drug resistance. Mutational frequencies for M. fortuitum with ciprofloxacin were relatively high (10(-5) to 10(-7), and MICs for single-step mutants were similar to those for the clinically resistant strains. Thus, despite the excellent activity of ciprofloxacin against rapidly growing mycobacterial groups other than M. chelonae, single-drug therapy should be used with caution because of the risk of development of mutational resistance.

Dilevalol compared with propranolol and placebo for systemic hypertension.

Dilevalol is a new antihypertensive agent that is both a vasodilator, through its beta 2-agonist action, and a nonselective beta antagonist. Two multicenter, double-blind studies were performed: study 1 compared dilevalol administered once-daily with either dilevalol or propranolol every 12 hours; study 2 compared dilevalol administered once daily with placebo. Both studies had a placebo run-in period to establish that the baseline supine diastolic blood pressures were consistent in the mild to moderate severity range (95 to 115 mm Hg) at 2 consecutive visits for study 1 and in the mild severity range (95 to 105 mm Hg) in study 2. Patients then were randomized to the double-blind titration phase, during which doses were titrated over a 9-week period to achieve a supine diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg and a decrease from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg. Patients were then maintained on a fixed dose for 2 months (study 1) or for 1 month (study 2). Dilevalol given once daily was as effective in reducing supine diastolic blood pressure as dilevalol every 12 hours and propranolol every 12 hours (study 1) and was superior to placebo (p less than 0.001) (study 2). In both studies, dilevalol given once daily was effective and well tolerated. The side-effect profile of dilevalol was similar to that of placebo and different from that of propranolol. Treatment with dilevalol resulted in significantly less fatigue (p less than 0.05), bradycardia (less than 50 beats/minute) and mental depression than with propranolol, but significantly (p less than 0.05) more diarrhea/loose stools.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Multicenter comparison of dilevalol to placebo in patients with mild hypertension.

The antihypertensive effects of oral dilevalol, a beta-blocking agent with vasodialating properties were compared with placebo in 128 mildly hypertensive patients (supine diastolic blood pressure 95 to 105 mm Hg) in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel group study. Following a 4-week placebo phase, 63 patients were randomly assigned to receive dilevalol and 65 to receive placebo. A titration phase followed during which the dose of dilevalol was increased every other week from 100 mg to 800 mg to achieve a supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) less than 90 mm Hg and decreased by 10 mm Hg or more from baseline. A matching number of placebo capsules for each dose level of dilevalol was dispensed for blinding purposes. Patients who had at least a 5 mm Hg reduction in SDBP entered a 1-month maintenance phase. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured weekly 20 to 24 hours after a dose. This study demonstrated that the minimally effective dose of dilevalol was 100 mg, which was shown to result in a significantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) greater reduction in systolic BP. A once-daily dose of 200 mg was superior to placebo in both systolic and diastolic BP effects (P less than 0.001 and less than 0.001, respectively), and this superiority was seen again at both the end of titration and the end of the study. The BP reduction was accompanied by a small (5 bpm) decrease in heart rate. The side effect profile of dilevalol was not different from placebo. Dilevalol appears to have no adverse effect on plasma lipids.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of guanfacine versus clonidine for efficacy, safety and occurrence of withdrawal syndrome in step-2 treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Guanfacine, an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, was compared with clonidine as step-2 therapy of mild to moderate essential hypertension in a 24-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel evaluation to determine efficacy, safety and occurrence of withdrawal syndrome. During a 5-week period, patients were weaned from current antihypertensives, if any, and stabilized on step-1 therapy with 25 mg of chlorthalidone once a day. Those with a diastolic blood pressure (BP) from 95 to 114 mm Hg while taking chlorthalidone were randomized to treatment. The 2 agents had equal efficacy; 149 of 270 patients treated with guanfacine (55%) and 164 of 276 treated with clonidine (59%) achieved goal diastolic BP of less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Terminations because of adverse effects were relatively low. Dry mouth (30% of guanfacine and 37% of clonidine groups) and somnolence (21% of guanfacine and 35% of clonidine groups, p less than 0.05) were reported most frequently. Nonsyncopal dizziness was reported in 11% of guanfacine-treated and 8% of clonidine-treated patients. This difference was not statistically significant. To evaluate the occurrence of a withdrawal syndrome in 316 outpatients and 156 inpatients, vital signs were monitored at least twice a day for up to 7 days after the end of therapy. Segmented 24-hour urine studies were performed on inpatients. Abrupt withdrawal of clonidine produced a rapid increase in diastolic and, especially, systolic BP, whereas guanfacine withdrawal produced more gradual increases. The differences were significant over the first 3 withdrawal days. It is concluded that guanfacine is a safe, effective, second-generation alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)