Safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of dostarlimab, an anti-PD-1, in patients with advanced solid tumors: a dose-escalation phase 1 trial.

PURPOSE: New immuno-oncology therapies targeting programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) have improved patient outcomes in a broad range of cancers. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the PK, pharmacodynamics (PDy), and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in adult patients with previously-treated advanced solid tumors who participated in parts 1 and 2A of the phase 1 GARNET study. METHODS: Part 1 featured a 3 + 3 weight-based dose-escalation study, in which 21 patients received dostarlimab 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The 2 fixed-dose nonweight-based dosing regimens of dostarlimab 500 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) and 1000 mg every 6 weeks (Q6W) were evaluated using a modified 6 + 6 design in part 2A (n = 13). In parts 1 and 2A, treatment with dostarlimab could continue for up to 2 years or until progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal, investigator's decision, or death. RESULTS: The dostarlimab PK profile was dose proportional, and maximal achievable receptor occupancy (RO) was observed at all dose levels in the weight-based and fixed-dose cohorts. Trough dostarlimab concentration after administration of dostarlimab 500 mg Q3W was similar to that after dostarlimab 1000 mg Q6W, the values of which (≈40 µg/mL) projected well above the lowest dostarlimab concentration required for full peripheral RO. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Dostarlimab demonstrated consistent and predictable PK and associated PDy. The observed safety profile was acceptable and characteristic of the anti-PD-1 drug class. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02715284. Registration date: March 9, 2016.

Phase I Study of the Mutant IDH1 Inhibitor Ivosidenib: Safety and Clinical Activity in Patients With Advanced Chondrosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Surgery is the primary therapy for localized chondrosarcoma; for locally advanced and/or metastatic disease, no known effective systemic therapy exists. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) enzymes occur in up to 65% of chondrosarcomas, resulting in accumulation of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). Ivosidenib (AG-120) is a selective inhibitor of mutant IDH1 approved in the United States for specific cases of acute myeloid leukemia. We report outcomes of patients with advanced chondrosarcoma in an ongoing study exploring ivosidenib treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I multicenter open-label dose-escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib monotherapy enrolled patients with mutant IDH1 advanced solid tumors, including chondrosarcoma. Ivosidenib was administered orally (100 mg twice daily to 1,200 mg once daily) in continuous 28-day cycles. Responses were assessed every other cycle using RECIST (version 1.1). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (escalation, n = 12; expansion, n = 9) with advanced chondrosarcoma received ivosidenib (women, n = 8; median age, 55 years; range, 30-88 years; 11 had received prior systemic therapy). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mostly grade 1 or 2. Twelve patients experienced grade ≥ 3 AEs; only one event was judged treatment related (hypophosphatemia, n = 1). Plasma 2-HG levels decreased substantially in all patients (range, 14%-94.2%), to levels seen in healthy individuals. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 7.4 months); the PFS rate at 6 months was 39.5%. Eleven (52%) of 21 patients experienced stable disease. CONCLUSION: In patients with chondrosarcoma, ivosidenib showed minimal toxicity, substantial 2-HG reduction, and durable disease control. Future studies of ivosidenib monotherapy or rational combination approaches should be considered in patients with advanced mutant IDH1 chondrosarcoma.

Phase 1 study to evaluate the effect of the MEK inhibitor trametinib on cardiac repolarization in patients with solid tumours.

PURPOSE: Trametinib is a reversible, selective inhibitor of the mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (MEK1) and 2 (MEK2). Cardiotoxicity (congestive heart failure, decreased heart rate, left ventricular dysfunction, and hypertension) related to trametinib is an infrequent, but serious, adverse event (AE). Prolongation of the QT interval increases the risk of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia. Thus, the risk of trametinib inducing QT prolongation at putative supratherapeutic exposure was evaluated. METHODS: Eligible patients with solid tumours received placebo on day 1, once-daily trametinib 2-mg doses on days 2-14, and a single trametinib 3-mg dose on day 15 to achieve supratherapeutic dosing for QTc measurement. Electrocardiogram was assessed by 12-lead ambulatory 24-h Holter monitoring pre-dose, and on day 1 and day 15. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) parameters were measured. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 35 patients completed the study. There was no effect of trametinib when compared with time-matched placebo on the change from baseline in QTcF, QTcB, or QTcI interval. Mean AUC0-24 and C max following trametinib 2-mg repeat doses were 364 ng.h/mL and 22.9 ng/mL, respectively; the corresponding values for the 3-mg dose were 454 ng.h/mL and 29.2 ng/mL. Median T max was approximately 2 h for both doses. Statistical analysis and PK/PD modelling showed no significant relationship between QTcF interval and trametinib plasma concentrations. AEs were consistent with those reported previously. No electrocardiogram abnormalities were reported as AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest trametinib has no significant effect on QT prolongation at supratherapeutic exposure.

Clinical pharmacology characterization of RG7112, an MDM2 antagonist, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: RG7112, the first selective small-molecule MDM2 antagonist in clinical testing, is a non-genotoxic oral p53 activator. To optimize its dose and schedule, a number of clinical pharmacology characteristics were explored in this multicenter trial in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHOD: In part 1, the impact of high-energy/high-fat meal and formulations (crystalline and amorphous) on relative bioavailability was examined in single-dose crossover designs. In part 2, schedule optimization (4 schedules of drug administration under fasting condition and 2 cohorts with liquid supplementation) was investigated in parallel, dose escalation designs. Clinical endpoints were pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) including MIC-1 elevation and platelet reduction, and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: With a single-dose treatment, a high-fat/high-energy meal and a new formulation under fasting condition, respectively, enhanced overall bioavailability of RG7112 slightly over twofold. Following multiple-dose administrations, all four schedules yielded the comparable per-cycle (28-d) exposure (AUC), as designed; liquid supplements also enhanced bioavailability. High-dose treatments of consecutive daily dosing for 5 and 3 days resulted in higher on-treatment-day exposure to RG7112 than both weekly and low-dose/long-duration (20-day) daily schedules. Serum MIC-1 and blood platelet profiles showed similar patterns to those of PK when the clinical pharmacology conditions were varied, suggesting the relative importance of treatment-day exposure than overall per-cycle AUC. CONCLUSION: Food (both high-fat and low-fat meals) and new formulation enhanced bioavailability. High-dose consecutive daily treatment for 3-5 days is superior to weekly and low-dose/long-duration (20-day) daily schedules in yielding the sufficiently high drug exposure and PD effects potentially required for cancer treatment efficacy.

Tesetaxel, a new oral taxane, in combination with capecitabine: a phase I, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This phase I study was conducted primarily to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tesetaxel, a novel, orally active, semisynthetic microtubule inhibitor of the taxane class, administered with oral capecitabine to patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: During each 21-day cycle, patients were to receive tesetaxel on Day 1 and capecitabine twice daily on Days 1 through 14. The starting dose was tesetaxel 18 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2)/day. These doses were increased based on tolerability during the first cycle according to the protocol-specified dose-escalation scheme. Response was evaluated every other treatment cycle according to RECIST. Serial blood samples were collected during the first and second cycles to explore possible pharmacokinetic drug interactions. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled and treated. The most frequently reported dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, with individual patients experiencing dose-limiting stomatitis and diarrhea. The MTD for the treatment regimen was defined as tesetaxel 27 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2)/day. The most common ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events included leukopenia (44% of patients) and neutropenia (41%). Of 22 evaluable patients, the best overall response was stable disease in 82% and progressive disease in 18%. No meaningful pharmacokinetic drug interactions were apparent. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that these two orally active agents can be combined at the individual MTD of each drug with acceptable toxicity. These data further support the continued clinical development of tesetaxel both as a single agent and in combination with other active cancer therapeutics.

A phase 1 open-label, accelerated dose-escalation study of the hypoxia-activated prodrug AQ4N in patients with advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: AQ4N is a novel prodrug that is selectively bioreduced to AQ4, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, in hypoxic tumor. This study assessed the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of AQ4N when administered weekly in patients with advanced cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: AQ4N was administered as a 30-minute i.v. infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle in eight dose cohorts ranging from 12 to 1,200 mg/m(2). Accelerated titration design was used and the maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose at which fewer than two of six patients had a dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated with cumulative doses of AQ4N ranging from 61.6 through 9,099.1 mg/m(2). A single patient per cohort was treated up to 384 mg/m(2) without toxicities. At 1,200 mg/m(2), two of five patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (grade 5 respiratory failure and grade 3 fatigue). Five cohort assigned patients were treated without toxicity at 768 mg/m(2), establishing this dose as the maximum tolerated dose. Among the most common adverse events observed were fatigue (38%), diarrhea (31%), nausea (25%), vomiting (25%), and anorexia (13%). Anticipated blue coloration of body fluids or skin was observed in all patients. The pharmacokinetics of AQ4N were dose proportional over all doses studied. Three patients experienced stable disease, including a patient with collecting duct renal cancer stable for 25 months. CONCLUSION: AQ4N is well tolerated when administered weekly on a 3-of-4-week schedule at 768 mg/m(2). Further combination studies investigating the safety and efficacy of AQ4N are ongoing.