Long-term remineralizing effect of MI Paste Plus on regression of early caries after orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a 12-month follow-up randomized controlled trial.

Background: Casein-phosphopeptide-amorphous-calcium-fluoride-phosphate (CPP-ACFP) can remineralize subsurface lesions. It is the active ingredient of MI-Paste-Plus® (MPP). The long-term remineralization efficacy is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the long-term effect of MPP versus a placebo paste on remineralization of enamel after fixed orthodontic treatment over a 12-month period. Design: This trial was designed as a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled RCT. Methods: Patients with subsurface lesions scheduled for removal of the appliance were included. They applied either MPP or control paste once a day at bedtime for 12 months, complementary to normal oral hygiene. Main outcome measures: Changes in enamel lesions (primary outcome) were fluorescence loss and lesion area determined by quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF). Secondary outcomes were Microbial composition, by conventional plating, and acidogenicity of plaque, by capillary ion analysis (CIA), and lesion changes scored visually on clinical photographs. Randomization: Participants [age = 15.5 years (SD = 1.6)] were randomly assigned to either the MPP or the control group, as determined by a computer-randomization scheme, created and locked before the start of the study. Participants received neutral-coloured concealed toothpaste tubes marked A or B. Blinding: The patients and the observers were blinded with respect to the content of tube A or B. Results: A total of 51 patients were analysed; MPP (n = 25) versus control group (n = 26); data loss (n = 14). There was no significant difference between the groups over time for all the used outcome measures. There was a significant improvement in enamel lesions (fluorescence loss) over time in both groups (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), with no differences between groups. Limitations: Being an in vivo study, non-compliance of the subjects could have influenced the result. Conclusion: The additional use of MPP in patients with subsurface enamel lesions after orthodontic fixed appliance treatment did not improve these lesions during the 1 year following debonding. Registration: This trial is registered at the medical ethical committee of the VU Medical Centre in Amsterdam (NL.199226.029.07).

Microbial profile of dental plaque associated to white spot lesions in orthodontic patients immediately after the bracket removal.

OBJECTIVE: Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) is suggested to predict caries risk in young children. Such a tool would be valuable in orthodontic patients undergoing treatment with fixed appliances. In this cross-sectional study the applicability of DGGE and conventional microbiology for caries risk assessment in orthodontic patients were assessed. DESIGN: Dental plaque was obtained from orthodontic patients immediately prior to bracket removal. Presence of white spot lesions (WSL) was assessed immediately post debracketing. DGGE-patterns and band counts were assessed using varying automated band detection settings and compared to visually detected bands to determine optimum settings. Optimum settings were used to compare band patterns in subjects with or without WSL. Microbiological samples were assessed for total colony forming units (CFU's) and percentages of aciduric flora, Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus spp. and Candida albicans. RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects were included with a mean age of 15.4yr (SD 1.6yr; 28 with WSL; 9 without WSL). Depending on settings, DGGE outcomes were different. Optimum minimum profiling absolute to the most intense band of 4% showed no significant difference in band numbers for subjects with or without WSL (p=0.845). Optimum settings for minimum profiling relative to the most intense band of 15% showed significant lower band numbers for subjects with WSL than those without (p=0.007). No differences between groups were observed for microbiological parameters. CONCLUSION: The analysis of DGGE-patterns is ambiguous. Software settings significantly affected outcomes. DGGE-patterns and band numbers like CFU counts were not predictive with respect to WSL formation in these orthodontic patients.

White spot lesions after orthodontic treatment assessed by clinical photographs and by quantitative light-induced fluorescence imaging; a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: White spot lesions (WSL) are an important side-effect of orthodontic multi-bracket (MB) treatment. Standardized monitoring of such WSL may help in caries management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study the discriminatory power of caries assessment on routine digital oral photographs was compared to quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) imaging in monitoring WSL development after debonding of orthodontic appliances. Oral and QLF photographs captured directly after debond (T1) and 1 year thereafter (T2) of 51 subjects, treated with full MB orthodontic appliances were used. Oral photographs were assessed by use of The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) at both time points independently and by side-by-side comparison to assess visual transition (VT). QLF photographs were categorized based on integrated fluorescence loss at T1 and T2. RESULTS: At T1 433 and 384 lesions on 918 buccal surfaces were detected using ICDAS and QLF, respectively. For both methods these numbers were reduced at T2. Changes within ICDAS scores were recorded by VT and showed mainly lesion improvement within ICDAS score 2. CONCLUSION: The oral and QLF photographs both showed regression of WSL after debonding of MB orthodontic appliances. The VT evaluation was found to have higher discriminatory power in comparison to ICDAS.