Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function.

PURPOSE: Studies have assessed the trauma and change in hearing function from the use of otological drills on the ossicular chain, but not the effects of partial laser ablation of the incus. A study of the effectiveness of a novel middle-ear microphone for a cochlear implant, which required an incus recess for the microphone balltip, provided an opportunity to compare methods and inform a feasibility study of the microphone with patients. METHODS: We used laser Doppler vibrometry with an insert earphone and probe microphone in 23 ears from 14 fresh-frozen cadavers to measure the equivalent noise level at the tympanic membrane that would have led to the same stapes velocity as the creation of the incus recess. RESULTS: Drilling on the incus with a diamond burr created peak noise levels equivalent to 125.1-155.0 dB SPL at the tympanic membrane, whilst using the laser generated equivalent noise levels barely above the baseline level. The change in middle ear transfer function following drilling showed greater variability at high frequencies, but the change was not statistically significant in the three frequency bands tested. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst drilling resulted in substantially higher equivalent noise, we considered that the recess created by laser ablation was more likely to lead to movement of the microphone balltip, and therefore decrease performance or result in malfunction over time. For patients with greatly reduced residual hearing, the greater consistency from drilling the incus recess may outweigh the potential benefits of hearing preservation with laser ablation.

Inappropriate Use of the "Rosowski Criteria" and "Modified Rosowski Criteria" for Assessing the Normal Function of Human Temporal Bones.

Important research by Rosowski et al. [Twenty-Seventh Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2004, p. 275] has led to a standard practice by the American Society for Testing Materials [West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2014] to assess normal function of temporal bones used in the development of novel middle ear actuators and sensors. Rosowki et al. [Audiol Neurotol. 2007; 12(4): 265-76] have since suggested that the original criteria are too restrictive and have proposed modified criteria. We show that both the original and modified criteria are inappropriate for assessing individual temporal bones. Moreover, we suggest that both the original and modified Rosowski criteria should be applied with caution when assessing whether mean data from a study are within physiological norms because the multiple comparisons resulting from verification at each frequency will lead to very liberal rejection. The standard practice, however, has led to the collection of more extensive and consistent data. We suggest that it is now opportune to use these data to further modify the Rosowski criteria.