Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide. SG is a restrictive procedure whereas OAGB involves malabsorption as well, supposing a risk of deficiency development post OAGB. The aim of the study was to compare nutritional deficiencies and metabolic markers one year after the procedures, while adhering to the current protocols. Retrospective analysis was performed for data on 60 adults undergoing primary OAGB, compared to 60 undergoing primary SG. Mean pre-surgery BMI for SG was 42.7 kg/m2 and 43.3 kg/m2 for OAGB. A multidisciplinary team followed up with the patients at least 3 times during the first year. Mean weight loss was 39.0 kg for SG and 44.1 kg for OAGB. The OAGB group presented a significantly sharper decline in T.Chol and a trend for sharper LDL decrease; a higher increase in folate and a trend for a greater decrease in albumin and hemoglobin were observed in OAGB. For vitamin B12, D, iron and ferritin, no difference was observed between the treatment groups, although there were some in-group differences. Nutritional recommendations and adopted supplement plans minimize the risk of deficiencies and result in improvement in metabolic biomarkers one year after OAGB, which was comparable to SG.

The Obesogenic and Glycemic Effect of Bariatric Surgery in a Family with a Melanocortin 4 Receptor Loss-of-Function Mutation.

We report the long-term response to bariatric surgery in a singular family of four adolescents with severe obesity (41-82 kg/m2), homozygous for the C271R loss-of-function mutation in the melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R), and three adults heterozygous for the same mutation. All patients had similar sociodemographic backgrounds and were followed for an average of 7 years. Three of the four homozygous patients regained their full weight (42-77 kg/m2), while the fourth lost weight but remained obese with a body mass index of 60 kg/m2. Weight regain was associated with relapse of most comorbidities, yet hyperglycemia did not relapse or was delayed. A1c levels were reduced in homozygous and heterozygous patients. The long-term follow-up data on this very unique genetic setting show that weight loss and amelioration of obesity following bariatric surgery require active MC4R signaling, while the improvement in glycemia is in part independent of weight loss. The study validates animal models and demonstrates the importance of biological signaling in the regulation of weight, even after bariatric surgery.

Bariatric Surgery Affects Plasma Levels of Alanine Aminotransferase Independent of Weight Loss: A Registry-Based Study.

Patients that undergo bariatric surgery experience weight loss and a reduction in the plasma levels of the hepatic enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). We used the Israeli national bariatric registry, which includes demographic, clinical, and biochemical data on 19,403 patients, of which 1335 patients had two-year follow-up data on ALT, AST, A1C, and BMI, to test the dependence of the reduction in the levels of ALT and AST on weight loss. The data were analyzed using regression models, retrospective matching, and time course analyses. Changes in liver enzymes did not correlate with change in BMI, and linear regression models did not demonstrate that the change in ALT and AST values were dependent on pre-operative levels of BMI or the extent of weight loss. ALT and AST levels were reduced two years after surgery compared with a cohort of retrospectively matched patients for ethnicity, sex, age, BMI, and A1C. Finally, patients who regained weight displayed a reduction in levels of liver enzymes. Our results suggest that bariatric surgery affects AST and ALT levels via weight loss dependent and independent mechanisms. Mechanistic studies that will identify the nature of this effect and the clinical relevance of ALT and AST levels to the post-bariatric liver function are warranted.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Is Associated with a Greater Reduction in Plasma Liver Enzymes Than Bypass Surgeries-A Registry-Based Two-Year Follow-Up Analysis.

Bariatric surgeries may lead to an improvement in metabolic fatty liver disease, and a reduction in the levels of the hepatic enzyme Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT). We compared the effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux en Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on the levels of ALT by analysis of two-year follow-up data from 4980 patients in the Israeli Bariatric Registry that included laboratory tests and demographic information. Pre-operative characteristics of patients, and particularly levels of liver enzymes, were similar across surgery types. Regression modeling and retrospective matching showed that SG was superior to RYGB and OAGB in reducing ALT levels, and in reducing the fraction of patients with abnormally high ALT levels. Two-year post-surgery, an increase in ALT levels from normal to abnormal levels was observed in 5% of SG patients, and in 18% and 23% of RYGB and OAGB patients. In conclusion, SG leads to a greater reduction in ALT levels compared with bypass surgeries and a lower incidence of post-surgical elevation of ALT levels. Further studies are required to identify the cause for the rise in liver enzymes, and to determine whether ALT levels correlate with liver pathology especially following bariatric surgery.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure-Revision to Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Roux-n-Y Gastric Bypass: a Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most popular bariatric procedure performed worldwide. However, many patients undergo secondary surgery due to either weight-related and complication-related reasons or both. Conversional options vary with one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-n-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) being the most common. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of converting failed LSG to either OAGB or RYGB, and compare weight-related results and post-conversion complications. METHODS: Retrospective review of hospital records of patients who underwent conversion from LSG to either RYGB or OAGB due to insufficient weight loss or weight regain in 7 bariatric centers between 2013 and 2019. Data retrieved included demographics, anthropometrics, comorbidities, indication for conversion, conversion type, complications, and weight loss. RESULTS: During the study period, 396 patients were included in the study. Eighty-four (21%) patients were lost to follow-up. RYGB and OAGB were performed in 119 and 144 patients, respectively. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) at revision were 44.2 years (range 19-72) and 40.6 ± 5.9 kg/m2 (range 35-71), respectively. Of these, 191 (73%) were female. Percent total body weight loss (%TWL) was 16% ± 1% for the RYGB group vs. 23% ± 12% for the OAGB group (p = 0.0007) at a median follow-up of 29 months (range 7-78 months) following conversion. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was significantly higher 1 year following conversion to OAGB vs. RYGB occurring in 25 (17.4%) and 9 (7.6%) patients, respectively (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of LSG to OAGB, compared to RYGB, results in increased weight loss but a higher rate of GERD and potential nutritional deficiencies.

Staple Line Leaks Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Low Efficacy of the Over-the-Scope Clip.

PURPOSE: The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) enables non-surgical management of gastrointestinal defects. The aim of this study was to report our experience with OTSC for patients with staple line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively maintained IRB-approved institutional database was queried for all patients treated with OTSC for staple line leaks following LSG from 2010 to 2018. Primary outcome was complete resolution of leak following OTSC. Secondary outcome was the number of additional procedures needed following OTSC. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (13 males, 13 females) were treated with OTSC for staple line leaks following LSG. The median age was 35 years (range 18-62), and mean body mass index was 44 kg/m2. The median time from index operation to leak diagnosis and from leak diagnosis to OTSC was 18 days (range 2-118), and 6 days (range 1-120), respectively. The initial endoscopic treatment was OTSC (n = 19), stent (n = 5), clip (n = 1), and clip and biologic glue (n = 1). OTSC alone led to final resolution of leak in 8 patients (31%) within 43 days of clip deployment (range 5-87). Five leaks resolved after a combination of OTSC and stent (19%) and one leak (4%) resolved after endoscopic suturing following a failed OTSC. Eleven patients (42%) failed endoscopic management and underwent total gastrectomy and esophagojejunostomy. One mortality (4%) was noted. The number of additional endoscopic sessions ranged from 1 to 10 (median 2). CONCLUSIONS: OTSC carries a low success rate for controlling staple line leaks following LSG.

Practices and attitudes of bariatric surgeons in Israel during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Israel ranks very high globally in performing bariatric surgery (BS) per capita. In the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic the bariatric surgeons' community faced many concerns and challenges, especially in light of a decree issued by the Ministry of Health (MOH) on March 22nd, to ban all elective surgery in public hospitals. The aim of this study is to portray the practices and attitudes of Israeli bariatric surgeons in the first phase of the pandemic. METHODS: Anonymous web-based questionnaire sent to all active bariatric surgeons in Israel. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software package. RESULTS: 53 out of 63 (84%) active surgeons responded to the survey. 18% practice in the public sector only, 4% in the private sector only and 78% in both sectors. 76% practice BS for more than 10 years and 68% perform more than 100 procedures a year. Almost all the surgeons (98%) experienced a tremendous decrease in operations. Nevertheless, there were substantial differences by sectors. In the public sector, 86% of the surgeons ceased to operate while 14% did not comply with the government's decree. In the public sector 69% of the surgeons were instructed by the administrators to stop operating. The majority of surgeons who continued to operate (77%) changed nothing in the indications or contra-indications for surgery. Among the surgeons who opted to refrain from operating on special sub-groups, the most frequent reasons were pulmonary disease (82%), age above 60 (64%), Ischemic heart disease (55%) and living in heavily affected communities. Roughly only half (57%) of the surgeons implemented changes in informed consent and operating room (OR) measures, contrary to guidelines and recommendations by leading professional societies. When asked about future conditions for reestablishing elective procedures, the reply frequencies were as follows: no special measures - 40%; PCR negativity - 27%; IgG positivity - 15%; waiting until the end of the pandemic- 9%. CONCLUSIONS: We showed in this nation-wide survey that the variance between surgeons, regarding present and future reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic, is high. There were substantial differences between the private and the public sectors. Although the instructions given by the MOH for the public sector were quite clear, the compliance by surgeons and administrators was far from complete. The administrators in the public sector, but more so in the private sector were ambiguous in instructing staff, leading surgeons to a more "personal non-structured" practice in the first phase of the pandemic. These facts must be considered by regulators, administrators and surgeons when planning for reestablishing elective BS or in case a second wave of the pandemic is on its way.

Comparative Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Adolescents-a National Registry-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: Most published work on bariatric surgery (BS) in adolescents describes outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. We compared the efficacy of LAGB and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in adolescents. METHODS: A National Bariatric Registry was queried for adolescents who underwent BS between June 2013 and December 2015. We collected data on weight and height at baseline and 1-year following surgery, subsequent hospitalizations, interventions, and mortality, which were compared at 30 days post-surgery and until last follow-up (maximum 4.2 years post-surgery). Mortality and hospitalization data were extracted from national databases. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-nine adolescents (60% females) aged 12-19 years were included. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 17.5 ± 1.2 years and 45.1 ± 5.0 kg/m2, respectively. LSG (n = 227, 87.6%) and LAGB (n = 32, 12.4%) were the most common procedures performed. LSG group achieved greater average at 1 year BMI loss compared to LAGB group (15.4 ± 4.7 kg/m2 vs. 10.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2 respectively; p = 0.0001) and higher rate with BMI < 30 kg/m2 1 year post-surgery (57.7% (n = 131) vs. 25% (n = 8), respectively; p = 0.0005). Males who underwent LSG reduced BMI more than their female counterparts (p = 0.0001), LSG was the strongest independent predictor for BMI < 30 after 1 year (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 1.7-9.9) followed by age (OR = 1.3; 95% CI1.0-1.6). No mortality was observed. Postoperative hospitalizations between the two groups did not differ (hazard ratio 2.4; 95% CI 0.7-7.9; p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Compared to LAGB, LSG is superior regarding weight loss with a similar risk of short- and long-term hospitalizations, complications, and interventional procedures. Males lose more weight following LSG.

Routine Upper Gastrointestinal Fluoroscopy Before Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Is It Necessary?

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the clinical utility of routine preoperative upper gastrointestinal (GI) fluoroscopy in morbid obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy of these studies in detecting hiatal hernias (HH). METHODS: The institution's prospectively maintained, IRB-approved database was retrospectively queried to identify all consecutive patients who underwent LSG between 2011 and 2017. All patients underwent routine preoperative upper GI fluoroscopy. Reports from all imaging studies were retrospectively reviewed and compared to the presence of an intraoperative HH. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 1810 patients (854 males, 956 females) underwent LSG at our institution. Mean age was 40.95 ± 13 years (range 11-75), and mean BMI was 42.8 ± 5 kg/m2 (range 30-86). The overall prevalence of HH was 11.1% (201 patients). All HHs detected were repaired. Considering the intraoperative identification of HH the gold standard for diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative UGI fluoroscopy for HH detection were 32% (66/201) and 94% (1512/1609), respectively. The median operative time was significantly longer when concomitant LSG and HH repair was performed compared to LSG alone (76 min vs. 55 min, p < 0.001, respectively). The foreknowledge of HH had no influence on the median operative times (77 min vs. 75 min, predicted vs. incidental, respectively, p = 1.34). HH repair did not affect the complication rate (p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: Routine preoperative upper GI fluoroscopy holds a low sensitivity for HH detection. Health policy regulators should consider omitting this exam from routine preoperative evaluation for bariatric patients.

Results of conversion of gastric banding to gastric bypass in patients between 50 and 60 years of age are similar to those observed in younger patients.

BACKGROUND: The effect of age and gender on outcomes of revisional bariatric surgery has not been assessed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing revision from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to laparoscopic roux en Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) between 2007 and 2017 was performed. Patients were divided according to gender and age (<50 and ≥ 50 years), and the outcomes of the subgroups were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 161 revisional LRYGBs were performed. Postoperative percentage of total body weight loss was comparable between the subgroups. No significant difference was observed between the groups in the improvement/resolution of comorbidities. Overall early complication rates were comparable, however major postoperative bleeding was more common in older patients (6.7 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.03). More late complications were demonstrated in females when compared to males (14.3 vs. 2.0%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Revisional LRYGB after failed LAGB yields acceptable results, regardless of patient gender and age.

A comparison between one- and two-stage revisional gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: The safety of performing a one-stage revision from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been questioned. The objective of this study was to compare safety and outcomes of one-stage versus two-stage revisional LRYGB performed after failed LAGB. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing revisional LRYGB after failed LAGB between January 2007 and March 2017 was performed. Patients undergoing one- and two-stage revisions were compared. The primary outcome assessed was the early complication rate, while secondary outcomes included late complications, weight loss, and improvement of comorbidities. RESULTS: During the study period, 161 revisional LRYGB's were performed, including 121 one-stage and 40 two-stage procedures. Baseline demographic data, BMI and presence of comorbidities were similar between the groups. In patients undergoing a two-stage procedure, band slippage, port infection, and erosion were more commonly cited as indications for revision. Similar early complication rates were demonstrated between the groups. However, late complications were more common in the two-stage group (20.0% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.03), including higher rates of gastro-gastric fistula (5.0% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) and anemia (10.0% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.02). Three-fourths of the cohort had a follow-up of more than 6 months, and the two groups demonstrated similar weight loss results and improvement/resolution of comorbidities. CONCLUSION: The performance of one-stage revisional LRYGB after failed LAGB seems to be a safe procedure, with noninferior outcomes when compared to a two-stage revisional procedure. It is a valid option, except in cases of mechanical and infectious band complications.

Not All Leaks Are Created Equal: a Comparison Between Leaks After Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass.

INTRODUCTION: It is commonly stated in bariatric surgical forums that leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are more difficult to manage than those following laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). However, no previous study has provided a thorough comparison of leak management following these two operations. METHODS: Our database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with leak following LSG and LRYGB performed between January 2007 and December 2017. RESULTS: Postoperative leak was diagnosed in 16/2132 (0.75%) LSG and 9/595 (1.5%) LRYGB patients. More of the LRYGB leaks had undergone revisional surgeries (66.7 vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001), and were diagnosed in the index admission (77.8 vs. 18.7%, p = 0.002). The mean time between the bariatric operation and the diagnosis of leak was 6.0 days in LRYGB and 26.2 days in LSG patients (p = 0.097). Approximately two thirds of each group were initially treated with laparoscopic exploration and drainage. Subsequent endoscopy was utilized more commonly in LSG patients (87.5 vs. 22.2%, p < 0.001). Drainage alone (laparoscopic or percutaneous) eventually led to leak resolution in more LRYGB patients (66.7 vs. 18.8%, p = 0.02), while endoscopic intervention led to resolution in more LSG patients (37.5 vs. 0%, p = 0.04). The mean time between leak diagnosis and its resolution was 57.8 and 44.2 days, for LSG and LRYGB patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of leak tends to be earlier in LRYGB patients. Endoscopic therapies are more frequently required in the management of leaks following LSG, while in those following LRYGB, drainage alone leads to resolution of leak in the majority of cases.

Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy in Septuagenarians.

BACKGROUND: Few previous studies have assessed the safety of bariatric surgery in septuagenarians. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients 70 years or older who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at our institution between 2012 and 2017 was performed. This group was compared to a matched cohort of younger LSG patients (18-50 years) who were operated during the same time period. RESULTS: Thirty septuagenarian LSG patients were compared to 60 younger patients. Gender distribution, preoperative weight, and preoperative body mass index (BMI) were comparable, although patients in the older age group suffered from more preoperative comorbidities (100 vs. 51.7%, p < 0.001). Operative time was longer (77.2 vs. 57.3 min, p = 0.005) and more hiatal hernias were repaired (46.7 vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001) in the older age group. Intraoperative complications occurred more in the older age group (6.7 vs. 0%, p = 0.04) but the overall complication rate (13.3 vs. 5.0%, p = 0.17) and the postoperative complication rate (10.0 vs. 5.0%, p = 0.38) were comparable. After a mean follow-up period of 31.3 and 33.5 months, the percentage of total body weight loss was 24.6 and 28.3% for the older and younger patients, respectively (p = 0.11). Rates of improvement/remission of comorbidities were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a carefully selected group of severely obese patients ≥ 70 years old, LSG may be safe, with acceptable postoperative complication rates, weight loss results, and improvement in comorbidities.

Outcomes of interval appendectomy in comparison with appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients treated conservatively for periappendiceal abscess or phlegmon would subsequently undergo interval appendectomy (IA); however, recent evidence has shed doubt on the necessity of this procedure. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of patients who underwent IA, in comparison with those operated acutely for appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis identified patients who underwent IA between 2000 and 2016. Their course and outcomes were compared with those of our previously published cohort of patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis. RESULTS: During the study period, 106 patients underwent IA. Their mean age was 39.7 ± 16.2 y, and 60.4% were females. In their index admission, 75.5% presented with abscesses. IA was performed successfully in all patients, and no patient required colectomy. Pathology demonstrated neoplastic lesions in 6/106, but only one was malignant. IA patients were compared with a cohort of 1649 acute appendectomy patients. This group was significantly younger (33.7 ± 13.3 y). Operation time was comparable between the groups (46.0 ± 26.2 versus 42.7 ± 20.9 min, respectively, P = 0.33). In the IA group, significantly more laparoscopic operations were performed (100% versus 93.9%), but with a higher conversion rate to open (1.9% versus 0.13%, P < 0.001). Although the overall complication rate was comparable, more intraoperative complications (2.8% versus 0.3%, P < 0.001) and deep/organ-space surgical site infections (surgical site infection; 4.7% versus 1.2%, P = 0.003) were reported in the IA group. CONCLUSIONS: IA can be a challenging procedure and should not be performed on a routine basis. However, neoplasia must be actively ruled out, particularly in the older age group.

Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with maternal and perinatal outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of deliveries that occurred from 2006 to 2016 at two university hospitals. The study group comprised all women who had undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and who delivered during the study period. If a woman had more than one pregnancy during the study period, data from only her first pregnancy were used. A control group was established by matching preoperative body mass index (BMI), age, parity, delivery history, and delivery year. RESULTS: Data from 238 women were analyzed, 119 post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and 119 matched control parturients. Among the post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients, the median preoperative BMI was 41.7 (interquartile range 39.9-44.4) and the median postoperative BMI was 28.9 (26.6-32.0). Compared with the control group, the study group had lower rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (3.4% vs 17.6%, P=.001), large-for-gestational-age neonates (1.7% vs 19.3%, P=.001), and birth weight greater than 4,000 g (0.8% vs 7.6%, P=.02) but higher proportions of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates (14.3% vs 4.2%, P=.01) and low-birth-weight neonates (12.6% vs 4.2%, P=.03). Rates of gestational hypertensive disorders and prematurity were comparable between the groups. For the study group, hemoglobin levels were lower in early pregnancy (median 12.6 vs 13.2 g/dL, P=.001) and after delivery (10.5 vs 10.8 g/dL, P=.002), and a higher proportion of patients were treated with intravenous iron supplementation during pregnancy (14.3% vs 0.8%, P=.001). Cesarean delivery rates during labor were lower in the study group (10.1% vs 20.2%, P=.04). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was associated with reduced rates of gestational diabetes mellitus, excessive fetal growth, and cesarean delivery and an increased rate of SGA and low-birth-weight neonates.

Hypoglycemia during oral glucose tolerance test among post-bariatric surgery pregnant patients: incidence and perinatal significance.

BACKGROUND: While hypoglycemia during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has been shown to occur in a considerable portion of nonpregnant post-bariatric surgery (BS) patients, its incidence among pregnant post-BS patients evaluated for gestational diabetes has only been sparsely studied. OBJECTIVES: We investigated OGTT results and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women who underwent 3 types of bariatric procedures before pregnancy. SETTING: A university hospital. METHODS: From medical records, data were collected on glucose measurements during a 100-g, 3-hour OGTT, as well as maternal and fetal outcomes. RESULTS: Of 119 post-BS pregnant patients included in the study, 55 underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 34 laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, and 30 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Hypoglycemia (<55 mg/dL) was encountered in 59 (49.6%) patients during the OGTT. Among them, the nadir plasma glucose levels occurred 2 hours after glucose ingestion in 25 (42.4%) and after 3 hours in 34 (57.6%), with a median value of 47 (44-52) mg/dL. The risk of hypoglycemia was higher among women with prior laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (83.3%) than among those with prior laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (54.5%; P = .009) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (11.8%; P<.0001). Time from surgery to conception was significantly shorter among women with evidence of hypoglycemia during OGTT (median 711 versus 1246 days, P = .002). Compared with patients without evidence of hypoglycemia, patients who experienced hypoglycemia had lower rates of gestational diabetes (P = .03) but higher proportions of low birth weight (P = .01) and small for gestational age infants (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Because hypoglycemia is common during OGTT among post-BS parturients, other diagnostic methods should be considered in this setting. The association found between hypoglycemia and poor fetal growth warrants investigation as to whether interventions to prevent hypoglycemia will improve fetal outcome.

Conversion of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding to Gastric Bypass: a Comparison to Primary Gastric Bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has a considerable failure rate. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is one of the rescue options. This study aims to compare the complication rates and outcomes between LAGB converted to LRYGB and primary LRYGB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in all patients converted from LAGB to LRYGB between January 2007 and March 2017. This group was compared to a matched cohort of primary LRYGB patients operated during the same period. Early and late complications, weight loss, and improvement of comorbidities were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one revisional LRYGB patients were compared to a similar number of primary LRYGB patients. Preoperative age, gender distribution, weight, and BMI were comparable. Mean operative time was longer in the revisional group (137.7 vs. 112.7 min, respectively, P < 0.001). The overall early complication rates were comparable between the groups (7.5 vs. 11.8%, P = 0.16), including postoperative leak rate (0.62%). Follow-up of at least 6 months was attained in 78% of the patients. Revisional cases demonstrated less weight loss (61.5 vs. 73.5%EWL, respectively, P = 0.004) and slightly less improvement of comorbidities (75.0 vs. 85.7%, respectively, P = 0.09). The late complication rate was comparable (8.1 vs. 8.1%, P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Albeit longer operating time, revision of LAGB to LRYGB is a safe procedure, with similar complication rates when compared to primary LRYGB. Although revisional LRYGB does result in less weight loss than primary LRYGB, the procedure's safety makes it a very plausible option as a rescue operation for failed LAGB.

Colon Cancer Associated Transcript-1 (CCAT1) Expression in Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach.

BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been shown to have functional roles in cancer biology and are dys-regulated in many tumors. Colon Cancer Associated Transcript -1 (CCAT1) is a lncRNA, previously shown to be significantly up-regulated in colon cancer. The aim of this study is to determine expression levels of CCAT1 in gastric carcinoma (GC). METHODS: Tissue samples were obtained from patients undergoing resection for gastric carcinoma (n=19). For each patient, tumor tissue and normal appearing gastric mucosa were taken. Normal gastric tissues obtained from morbidly obese patients, undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy served as normal controls (n=19). A human gastric carcinoma cell line (AGS) served as positive control. RNA was extracted from all tissue samples and CCAT1 expression was analyzed using quantitative real time-PCR (qRT-PCR). RESULTS: Low expression of CCAT1 was identified in normal gastric mucosa samples obtained from morbidly obese patients [mean Relative Quantity (RQ) = 1.95±0.4]. AGS human gastric carcinoma cell line showed an elevated level of CCAT1 expression (RQ=8.02). Expression levels of CCAT1 were approximately 10.8 fold higher in GC samples than in samples taken from the negative control group (RQ=21.1±5 vs. RQ=1.95±0.4, respectively, p<0.001). Interestingly, CCAT1 expression was significantly overexpressed in adjacent normal tissues when compared to the negative control group (RQ = 15.25±2 vs. RQ=1.95±0.4, respectively, p<0.001). Tissues obtained from recurrent GC cases showed the highest expression levels (RQ = 88.8±31; p<0.001). Expression levels increased with tumor stage (T4- 36.4±15, T3- 16.1±6, T2- 4.7±1), however this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.2). There was no difference in CCAT1 expression between intestinal and diffuse type GC (RQ=22.4±7 vs. 22.4±16, respectively, p=0.9). Within the normal gastric tissue samples, no significant difference in CCAT1 expression was observed in helicobacter pylori negative and positive patients (RQ= 2.4±0.9 vs. 0.93±0.2, respectively, p=0.13). CONCLUSION: CCAT1 is up-regulated in gastric cancer, and may serve as a potential bio-marker for early detection and surveillance.