Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).

OBJECTIVE: Central corneal thickness influences intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. We examined the central corneal thickness of subjects in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) and determined if central corneal thickness is related to race. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand three hundred one OHTS subjects with central corneal thickness measurements. INTERVENTION: Central corneal thickness was determined with ultrasonic pachymeters of the same make and model at all clinical sites of the OHTS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of mean central corneal thickness with race, baseline IOP, refraction, age, gender, systemic hypertension, and diabetes. RESULTS: Mean central corneal thickness was 573.0 +/- 39.0 microm. Twenty-four percent of the OHTS subjects had central corneal thickness > 600 microm. Mean central corneal thickness for African American subjects (555.7 +/- 40.0 microm; n = 318) was 23 microm thinner than for white subjects (579.0 +/- 37.0 microm; P < 0.0001). Other factors associated with greater mean central corneal thickness were younger age, female gender, and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: OHTS subjects have thicker corneas than the general population. African American subjects have thinner corneas than white subjects in the study. The effect of central corneal thickness may influence the accuracy of applanation tonometry in the diagnosis, screening, and management of patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Contralateral effect of topical beta-adrenergic antagonists in initial one-eyed trials in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the magnitude of the contralateral effect of topically administered beta-blockers on intraocular pressure. METHODS: The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study enrolled 1,636 subjects. Of these, 817 subjects were randomized to receive topical ocular hypotensive medication and 819 subjects were randomized to close observation (i.e., no topical medication). We compared the intraocular pressure of the contralateral eye of subjects at the baseline visit and after an initial one-eyed therapeutic trial of topical beta-blockers. We examined differences between baseline and follow-up intraocular pressure in untreated eyes of subjects randomized to close observation. RESULTS: The mean reduction in intraocular pressure in the beta-blocker-treated eyes was -5.9 +/- 3. 4 mm Hg (-22% +/- 12%; Student t test, P <.0001). In the contralateral eyes, mean intraocular pressure reduction was -1.5 +/- 3.0 mm Hg (-5.8% +/- 12%; P <.0001). Of the contralateral eyes, 35% showed a reduction of 3 mm Hg or more, and 10% showed a reduction of 6 mm Hg or more. The contralateral effect of the relatively selective beta-blocker betaxolol did not differ from that of any of the nonselective beta-blockers. Factors associated with the magnitude of the contralateral effect were the degree of intraocular pressure reduction in the treated eye and baseline intraocular pressure of the contralateral eye. In the close observation group, no significant reduction in intraocular pressure was noted between the baseline and follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: The contralateral effect is important in clinical practice and in clinical trials when the hypotensive effect of a topical beta-blocker is evaluated by means of a one-eyed therapeutic trial.

Anaemia in men receiving combined finasteride and flutamide therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of combined finasteride and flutamide therapy on haemoglobin and haematocrit values in men with advanced prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen men, previously untreated by hormone therapy, with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate and clinical evidence of advanced disease, were treated with combined finasteride (5 mg/day) and flutamide (750 mg/day) for at least 6 months. Complete blood counts were performed before initiation and after 6 months of therapy. RESULTS: After 6 months of finasteride and flutamide therapy both haemoglobin levels and haematocrit decreased in all men, with a mean (sd, range) decrease of 16 (10, 3-42) g/L and 4.6 (2.7, 0.8-9.9)%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combined finasteride and flutamide therapy significantly lowers haemoglobin and haematocrit levels in men with advanced prostate cancer, and further study of this effect is warranted.

Serum free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density measurements for predicting cancer in men with prior negative prostatic biopsies.

PURPOSE: We examined the usefulness of measurements of free prostate specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density for predicting prostate cancer in men who had had a prior negative biopsy, a serum PSA level of 4.1 to 10.0 ng./ml. and benign findings on prostate examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured percent free serum PSA and PSA density in 163 male volunteers age 50 years or older who were advised to have repeat prostatic biopsies for a serum PSA level of 4.1 to 10.0 ng./ml. RESULTS: Of 99 men who had repeat biopsies 20 (20%) had prostate cancer detected. Prostate cancer was significantly associated with lower free PSA level and higher PSA density, with overlap in 83% of the cases. The use of percent free PSA cutoffs of 28 and 30% would have detected 90 and 95% of cancers, respectively, and avoided 13 and 12% of the biopsies, respectively. PSA density cutoffs of 0.10 and 0.08 would have detected 90 and 95% of cancers, respectively, and avoided 31 and 12% of biopsies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Free PSA and PSA density predict prostate cancer in men who have had prior negative prostatic biopsies, serum PSA levels of 4.1 to 10.0 ng./ml. and a benign prostate examination. Both parameters may be used to avoid unnecessary biopsies with an acceptable decrease in sensitivity. Further studies are needed to determine cutoffs to be used in clinical practice.