Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Oral Sci ; 65(2): 121-126, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36990756

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Today, bulk-fill composites are used as a single layer with a thickness of up to 4-5 mm. However, is proper polymerization achieved with this increased thickness? METHODS: This study was designed to investigate the effect of thickness on the degree of conversion (DC) (n = 6), the elution of monomers (n = 6), depth of cure (DoC) (n = 10) and cytotoxicity (n = 6) of the bulk-fill composites SDR Flow Plus (SDR), SonicFill2 SingleFill (SF) and ACTIVA Bioactive Restorative (ACT) in comparison to the conventional G-aenial Posterior (GC). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the interaction between materials and surfaces, and one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to compare the degree of conversion, monomer elution and cytotoxicity values (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The highest DC was found at the top surface of SDR, while the lowest DC was found at SF. The V2 mm/V0 mm DoC ratios of the composites except ACTs were appropriate according to the threshold. None of the composites were cytotoxic on day 1. CONCLUSION: In bulk-fill composites, DC decreased and monomer elution increased with increasing depth. The V4 mm/V0 mm ratios of all bulk-fill groups were not appropriate. Additionally, only ACTs had a cell viability of <70% on day 7.


Assuntos
Resinas Compostas , Materiais Dentários , Teste de Materiais , Resinas Compostas/toxicidade , Polimerização , Materiais Dentários/toxicidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...