Advance care planning in primary care: a retrospective medical record study among patients with different illness trajectories.

BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning (ACP) enables physicians to align healthcare with patients' wishes, reduces burdensome life-prolonging medical interventions, and potentially improves the quality of life of patients in the last phase of life. However, little objective information is available about the extent to which structured ACP conversations are held in general practice. Our aim was to examine the documentation of ACP for patients with cancer, organ failure and multimorbidity in medical records (as a proxy for ACP application) in Dutch general practice. METHODS: We chose a retrospective medical record study design in seven primary care facilities. Medical records of 119 patients who died non-suddenly (55 cancer, 28 organ failure and 36 multimorbidity) were analysed. Other variables were: general characteristics, data on ACP documentation, correspondence between medical specialist and general practitioner (GP), and healthcare utilization in the last 2 years of life. RESULTS: In 65% of the records, one or more ACP items were registered by the GP. Most often documented were aspects regarding euthanasia (35%), the preferred place of care and death (29%) and concerns and hopes towards the future (29%). Median timing of the first ACP conversation was 126 days before death (inter-quartile range (IQR) 30-316). ACP was more often documented in patients with cancer (84%) than in those with organ failure (57%) or multimorbidity (42%) (p = 0.000). Patients with cancer had the most frequent (median 3 times, IQR 2-5) and extensive (median 5 items, IQR 2-7) ACP consultations. CONCLUSION: Documentation of ACP items in medical records by GPs is present, however limited, especially in patients with multimorbidity or organ failure. We recommend more attention for - and documentation of - ACP in daily practice, in order to start anticipatory conversations in time and address the needs of all people living with advanced conditions in primary care.

Failure of ketogenic diet therapy in GLUT1 deficiency syndrome.

PURPOSE: Epilepsy in GLUT1 deficiency syndrome is generally drug-resistant; ketogenic diet (KD) therapy is the mainstay of therapy, as production of ketones provides the brain with an alternative energy source, bypassing the defect in GLUT1. Failure of KD therapy and risk factors for failure have been sparsely published. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of GLUT1DS patients with refractory epilepsy failing on KD therapy, to identify their clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Failure of the ketogenic diet was due to KD inefficacy (poor effect despite adequate ketosis), as well as intolerance and an inability to attain ketosis. Our cohort of seven patients in whom KD therapy failed stood out for their advanced age at seizure onset, i.e. almost 4 years vs 8 months in large series, female sex, as well as their advanced age at diagnosis and initiation of KD therapy. EEG recordings during KD therapy can aid in the assessment of effectiveness of the KD therapy. CONCLUSIONS: GLUT1DS is generally described as a treatable disorder and existing case series do not provide details of treatment failure. In select patients with GLUT1DS, KD therapy fails, rendering GLUT1DS an essentially untreatable disorder. Failure of the ketogenic diet was due to KD inefficacy (poor effect despite adequate ketosis), as well as intolerance and an inability to attain ketosis. Failure to reduce seizure frequency with deterioration of the EEG findings should lead to consideration of cessation of KD therapy.