Vagal responses induced by endocardial left atrial autonomic ganglion stimulation before and after pulmonary vein antrum isolation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Elimination of vagal inputs into the left atrium (LA) may be necessary for successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). These vagal inputs are clustered in autonomic ganglia (AG) that are close to the pulmonary vein antrum (PVA) borders, but whether standard intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided PVA isolation (PVAI) affects these inputs is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether standard ICE-guided PVAI affects vagal responses induced by endocardial AG stimulation in the LA. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients undergoing first-time PVAI (group 1) and 20 consecutive patients undergoing repeat PVAI for AF recurrence (group 2) were enrolled in the study. Before ablation, electrical stimulation (20 Hz, pulse duration 10 ms, voltage range 12-20 V) was performed through an 8-mm-tip ablation catheter. Based on prior data, regions around all four PVA borders were carefully mapped and stimulated to localize AG inputs. A positive stimulated vagal response was defined as atrioventricular (AV) block, asystole, or increase in mean RR interval by >50%. Locations of positive vagal responses were recorded wth biplane fluoroscopy and CARTO. All patients then underwent standard ICE-guided PVAI by an operator blinded to the locations of vagal responses. Stimulation of the AG locations was then repeated postablation. RESULTS: Patients (age 54 +/- 11 years, 30% female, ejection fraction 54% +/- 7%) had a history of paroxysmal (75%) and persistent (25%) AF. In group 1, vagal responses were induced in all 20 patients around a mean of 3.8 +/- 0.4 PVAs per patient. The most common response was asystole (53%), mean RR slowing >50% (28%), and AV block (20%). Postablation, vagal responses could no longer be induced in all 20 patients. A diminished response was induced (RR slowing <50%) in 2/20 patients around one PVA each. In group 2, vagal responses were not induced in any of the 20 repeat patients. Stimulation capture postablation was confirmed because transient, nonsustained (<30 seconds) AF or atrial flutter was induced in all 40 patients with stimulation, whether vagal responses were induced or not. CONCLUSIONS: Standard ICE-guided PVAI eliminates vagal responses induced by AG stimulation. Responses are not seen in patients presenting for repeat PVAI, despite clinical recurrence of AF.

Left atrial appendage exclusion and the risk of thromboembolic events following mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with respect to thromboembolic events. BACKGROUND: LAA is the predominant source of emboli in patients with atrial fibrillation. Prophylactic LAA exclusion at the time of heart surgery has been recommended to reduce the risk of future thromboembolism. METHODS: An observational cohort of 136 patients undergoing LAA exclusion during mitral valve surgery was identified between May 1993 and November 1998 at our institution. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 3.6 +/- 1.3 years, there were 14 (12.3%) thromboembolic events. Compared with patients who received warfarin upon hospital discharge, there were more thromboembolic events in patients not prescribed warfarin upon hospital discharge (n = 7/67, 10% vs n = 6/40, 15%, respectively). The warfarin status was not known for one patient. The majority of thromboembolic events (n = 10/14, 71%) occurred in those who underwent mitral valve repair. CONCLUSION: In this observational study, patients who undergo LAA exclusion during mitral valve surgery to reduce the risk of thromboembolism have a significant incidence of thromboembolic events, especially when warfarin therapy is not prescribed upon hospital discharge.

The need for atrial flutter ablation following pulmonary vein antrum isolation in patients with and without previous cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of atrial flutter (AFL) after pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) in patients with previous cardiac surgery (PCS) in comparison to patients without PCS and to assess the need for AFL ablation in both groups. BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and AFL often co-exist. Pulmonary vein antrum isolation may be sufficient to control both arrhythmias. However, in patients with PCS, atrial incisions, cannulations, and scar areas may cause AFL recurrence despite elimination of pulmonary vein triggers. METHODS: Data from 1,345 patients who had PVAI were analyzed. Patients with a history of AFL ablation and patients who had concomitant AFL ablation during PVAI were excluded from analysis. Sixty-three patients constituted the PCS group (Group 1, age 57 +/- 13 years, 12 female) and 1,062 patients constituted the non-PCS group (Group 2, age 55 +/- 12 years, 212 female). Patients in Group 1 had larger left atria, higher incidence of AFL pre-PVAI, and lower ejection fraction. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in post-PVAI AF recurrence between Groups 1 and 2, but AFL incidence after PVAI was higher in Group 1 (33% vs. 4%, p < 0.0001). Ablation of AFL in Group 1 patients resulted in an 86% acute success rate and 11% recurrence over a mean follow-up of 357 +/- 201 days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PCS, post-PVAI AF recurrence is similar to patients without PCS. However, history of PCS is associated with a higher recurrence of AFL after PVAI. In a significant number of patients with PCS, AFL ablation is required to achieve a cure.

Pre-existent left atrial scarring in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation: an independent predictor of procedural failure.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the impact of left atrial scarring (LAS) on the outcome of patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Left atrial scarring may be responsible for both the perpetuation and genesis of AF. METHODS: A total of 700 consecutive patients undergoing first-time PVAI were studied. Before ablation, extensive voltage mapping of the left atrium (LA) was performed using a multipolar Lasso catheter guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Patients with LAS were defined by a complete absence of electrographic recording by a circular mapping catheter in multiple LA locations, and this was validated by electroanatomic mapping. All four pulmonary vein antra and the superior vena cava were isolated using an ICE-guided technique. Patients were followed at least nine months for late AF recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of LAS and other variables on outcome. RESULTS: Of 700 patients, 42 had LAS, which represented 21 +/- 11% of the LA surface area by electroanatomic mapping. Patients with LAS had a significantly higher AF recurrence (57%) compared with non-LAS patients (19%, p = 0.003). Also, LAS was associated with a significantly larger LA size, lower ejection fraction, and higher C-reactive protein levels. Univariate analysis revealed age, nonparoxysmal AF, and LAS as predictors of recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed LAS as the only independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 9.4; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-existent LAS in patients undergoing PVAI for AF is a powerful, independent predictor of procedural failure. Left atrial scarring is associated with a lower EF, larger LA size, and increased inflammatory markers.

Prevalence, predictors, and mortality significance of the causative arrhythmia in patients with electrical storm.

INTRODUCTION: Electrical storm (ES) is characterized by either refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, little is known about the prevalence, predictors, and mortality implications of the causative arrhythmia in ES. We sought to assess the prevalence, predictors, and survival significance of VT and VF as the causative arrhythmia of ES in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients from January 2000 to December 2002 who presented to the ICD clinic with > or = 2 separate ventricular arrhythmic episodes requiring shock within 24 hours were included in the study. ICD interrogation confirmed the number of shocks and provided electrograms for interpretation of the causative arrhythmia. Patients were grouped as VF or VT according to the causative arrhythmia. Their prevalence, predictors, and mortality rates were compared. Of 2,028 patients assessed in the ICD clinic, 208 (10%) presented with ES. VF was the cause of ES in 99 of 208 patients, for an overall prevalence of 48%. Original ICD indication, coronary artery disease, and amiodarone therapy were predictive for the causative arrhythmia. There was no mortality difference between the VT and VF groups; however, both groups had significantly increased mortality compared to a control ICD population without ES. CONCLUSION: VF is the causative arrhythmia for a sizable proportion of patients with ES. The initial ICD indication, coronary artery disease, and amiodarone therapy are predictors of the causative arrhythmias in ES. There does not appear to be any mortality difference between ES patients with VT and VF, but mortality is increased in patients with ES versus control ICD patients without ES.