Childhood wheezing phenotypes and their association to perinatal factors: a longitudinal study.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple gestational and early life factors have been described as the variables that increase the risk for each phenotype of infantile wheezing. Our objective was to study the evolution of wheezing in a cohort of children followed up to 9-10 years of age and its relationship with different perinatal risk factors. METHODS: A longitudinal study was made on the evolution of wheezing, over time, in 1164 children from Salamanca (Spain) included in the International Study of Wheezing in Infants, when the children were 12 months old. They were classified into three phenotypes: transient early wheezing (last episode before 3 years of age), early persistent wheezing (start before 3 years age and persisting thereafter), and late-onset wheezing (first episode after 3 years of age). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to establish associations between the different phenotypes and perinatal factors. RESULTS: Data were obtained corresponding to a total of 531 children. Of these, 169 (31.8%) had experienced transient early wheezing, 100 (18.8%) early persistent wheezing, 28 (5.3%) late-onset wheezing, and 234 (44.1%) had never experienced wheezing. Cesarean delivery, early exposure to infections, the presence of atopic eczema, and a smoking father were associated with transient early wheezing. Early persistent wheezing was associated with a family history of allergy, smoking, and obstetric diseases. Exclusive breastfeeding was identified as a protective factor in both transient and persistent early wheezing. Late-onset wheezing was associated with the male gender and with maternal history of rhinitis and eczema. CONCLUSIONS: Wheezing phenotypes were associated with different risk perinatal factors. Knowledge in the field is essential in order to influence the modifiable factors.

The use of spirometers and peak flow meters in the diagnosis and management of asthma among Spanish pediatricians. Results from the TRAP study.

The objective of this study was to determine the level of adherence of pediatricians in Spain to the Spanish National Guidelines for Asthma Treatment with regard to the use of a peak flow meter (PEFR) or a spirometer in the diagnosis and management of asthma in childhood and to analyze sources of variations in these practices. A prospective survey (consisting of demographic and asthma knowledge sections) was conducted over a 2-wk time interval of 3000 pediatricians throughout the country. At least one part of the questionnaire was completed and returned by 2773 individuals (92.4%), with 2347 (78.2%) answering both sections; results are for this population. Around 62% of the pediatricians reported having a peak flow meter or a spirometer in their office; however, only 33% and 48% of them used the devices for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma, respectively. There was a significant association between being older (36-55 yr old) and using PEFR or spirometry for the diagnosis (OR: 1.35, 95% CI 1.11-1.66) and the management (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.22-1.77) of asthma. Males used a peak flow meter or a spirometer more often than females for the diagnosis (37.8% vs. 30.9%, p = 0.001) and management of asthma (52.0% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.008). Pediatricians with formal pediatric residence training used these devices more for the diagnosis (OR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.75) and management (OR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.27-1.96) than those without. Working in a hospital was also related with more peak flow meter or spirometer use than working in health centers (OR: 2.08, 95% CI 1.71-2.54 for diagnosis; OR: 1.83, 95% CI 1.50-2.22 for management). About one-third of the Spanish pediatricians surveyed use spirometers and/or peak flow meters for diagnosing asthma and about half use one of these devices occasionally for managing the disease. Independent factors favoring their use are: age 36-55 yr, male gender, working in a hospital setting, and having been trained in a formal pediatric residence program.