Endoscopic drainage versus percutaneous drainage for the management of infected walled-off necrosis: a comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Comparative data on percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) vs EUS-guided drainage (EUS-D) for management of symptomatic walled-off-necrosis (WON), specially infected WON with/without organ failure(OF) is limited. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic WON were divided into two groups of PCD and EUS-D, depending on the modality of drainage. Resolution of OF, adverse events, and other outcome measures were recorded. The two modalities were compared among infected WON sub-cohort and also degree of solid component (SC). RESULTS: 218 patients (175 males; 80.3%) were included who underwent either PCD (n = 102) or EUS-D (n = 116). Clinical success was significantly higher in the EUS-D group (92.1% vs 64.6%; p < 0.0001) and even for infected WON (n = 128) (p = 0.004), with higher (p = 0.007) and faster (p < 0.0001) OF resolution. Other outcome measures including mortality were significantly higher in the PCD group. Among subgroups, PCD with >40% SC had the worst clinical success/OF resolution rates, while EUS-D with <40% SC had the best outcomes. CONCLUSION: EUS-D should be preferred over PCD in the management of WON, infected or otherwise, for higher clinical success, and higher/faster resolution of OF. PCD should be avoided in WON with>40% SC.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage of Patients With Infected Walled-off Necrosis: Which Stent to Choose?

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is the preferred treatment of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC). However, the choice of the stent for EUS-guided drainage in critically ill PFC cases with infected walled-off necrosis (WON) and/or organ failure (OF) remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, consecutive patients with symptomatic PFC subjected to EUS-guided drainage using biflanged metal stents (BFMS) or double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) were compared for technical success, clinical success, duration of the procedure, need for intensive care unit stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, ventilator need, resolution of OF, the duration for resolution of OF, complications, need for salvage percutaneous drainage or surgery and mortality. A subgroup of patients having infected WON with/without OF were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Among 120 patients (84.6% males) with PFC (108 WON, 22 pseudocyst) who underwent EUS-guided drainage, there was no difference in outcome parameters in BFMS and DPPS groups. Among patients with WON, clinical success was significantly higher (96.2% vs. 81.8%, P=0.04), with significantly shorter hospital stay (6 vs. 10 d) and procedure duration (17.18±4.6 vs. 43.6±9.7 min, P<0.0001) in the BFMS group. Among patients with infected WON with/without OF, the clinical success was significantly higher (100% vs. 73.9%, P=0.02), and the duration of the procedure was significantly lower (16.28±4.4 vs. 44.39±10.7, P<0.0001) in BFMS compared with DPPS group. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided drainage of WON using BFMS scores over DPPS. In patients having infected WON with/without OF, BFMS may be preferred over DPPS.

Antibiotics for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: systematic review & Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Various antibiotic regimens are used for primary and secondary prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). A systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare various antibiotics regimens for primary and secondary prevention of SBP were done. METHODS: We did a comprehensive literature search using various databases (i.e. MEDLINE via Ovid and PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and others) from inception to 26th October 2019 using various keywords. Only randomised studies which evaluated the role of antibiotics in adult cirrhotic patients with ascites for primary or secondary prophylaxis of SBP were included. The primary outcome was occurrence/recurrence of SBP episode and other outcomes assessed were extra-peritoneal infections and reduction in mortality. We did random-effects network meta-analysis using a Bayesian approach, and calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrI); agents were ranked using rank probabilities. RESULTS: We found total 1701 records in our systematic database search and out of these 17 randomised trials were found eligible for network meta-analysis. For primary prevention of SBP, the odds ratio (95% CrI) for norfloxacin daily was 0.061 (0.0060, 0.33) and for rifaximin daily was 0.037 (0.00085, 0.87) and norfloxacin and rifaximin alternate month was 0.027 (0.00061, 0.61) when compared to placebo or no comparator. For the secondary prevention of SBP, rifaximin daily had odds of 0.022 (0.00011, 0.73). CONCLUSION: Rifaximin is useful for both primary and secondary prevention of SBP whereas norfloxacin daily and alternate norfloxacin and rifaximin are useful for primary prophylaxis.

Risk of hepatitis with various reintroduction regimens of anti-tubercular therapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Objective: To compare risk of hepatotoxicity between various regimens for reintroduction of antitubercular therapy (ATT) in patients with previous episode of ATT hepatitis.Methods: We searched various databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, WoS and LILACS) for studies comparing ATT reintroduction regimens using terms 'drug-induced liver injury' and 'antitubercular drugs' AND 'reintroduction'. The reintroduction regimens i.e concomitant (all drugs introduced together), sequential (reintroduction of one drug in full dose followed by another) or incremental (one drug in a low dose and then higher dose followed by next drug) were compared using Bayesian approach for network meta-analysis with random-effect model. Cochrane revised tool was used to assess risk of bias in included studies (RoB 2.0).Results: Four randomized studies with 577 patients were eligible for analysis. Compared with concomitant regimen (baseline comparator), incremental regimen appeared to have lower risk of ATT hepatitis (odds ratio [OR] 0.24; 95% CrI 0.017, 1.2) as also the sequential regimen (OR 0.33; 95% CrI 0.033, 1.7). Rifampicin first and isoniazid first reintroduction regimens were similar via-a-vis recurrence of hepatotoxicity.Conclusion: The sequential and incremental regimen may be better than concomitant regimen in reducing risk of ATT hepatitis although the odds did not achieve statistical significance.

Site and size of extrapancreatic necrosis are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The site and size of extrapancreatic necrosis (EPN) as assessed on computed tomography may influence the severity of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of site and size of EPN on the clinical outcomes in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). METHOD AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study comprised of consecutive patients with ANP who were admitted between January 2017 and March 2019. Patients in whom the initial contrast enhanced CT showed EPN were eligible for inclusion. The site, volume and maximum dimension of EPN were recorded. The severity of AP and modified CT severity index (MCTSI) was calculated. Clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients (mean age, 37.56 years, 91 males) were included. There was a significant association between the location of EPN and the outcome parameters. The left posterior pararenal collections were significantly associated with mortality (P = 0.041), left paracolic gutter collections with the length of hospitalisation (LOH) (P = 0.014), and right paracolic gutter and mesenteric collections with the intensive care unit (ICU) stay (P = 0.024, and P = 0.021, respectively). There was a significant correlation between the volume and the maximum dimension of collection with LOH and ICU stay. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for volume, maximum dimension and MCTSI for predicting death was 0.724 (95% CI, 0.612-0.837), 0.644 (95% CI, 0.516-0.772) and 0.574 (95% CI, 0.452-0.696), respectively. CONCLUSION: The site and size of EPN provide reliable and objective information for assessing clinical outcomes in patients with ANP.

Utility of tissue Xpert-Mtb/Rif for the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis in patients with ileocolonic ulcers.

INTRODUCTION: Data on the use of Xpert Mtb/Rif for the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis is sparse. We report on the utility of Xpert Mtb/Rif testing for diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) in patients with ileocecal ulcers. METHODOLOGY: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with ileocecal ulcers and suspected to have ITB and in whom testing of intestinal tissue for Xpert Mtb/Rif was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: those with a final diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis and those with other diagnosis. These patients were compared for clinical features and presentation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Xpert Mtb/Rif for the diagnosis of ITB were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients studied, 23 were women and the mean age was 32.92 ±â€„12.78 years. Abdominal pain was present in 33 (88.5%) patients and diarrhea in 12 (30%). A total of 25 patients had underlying ITB whereas 15 patients had other diagnoses (Crohn's disease, amebiasis, nonspecific ileitis, etc.). The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of GeneXpert-Mtb/Rif was 32% (CI: 14.95-53.50%), 100% (78.2-100), 46.88% (40.27-53.59%), 100 & 57.50 (40.89-72.89%) respectively. CONCLUSION: A positive GeneXpert-Mtb/Rif helps in the diagnosis of ITB, but the sensitivity is low.

Predictors of outcome of percutaneous catheter drainage in patients with acute pancreatitis having acute fluid collection and development of a predictive model.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) is effective initial strategy in the step-up approach of management of acute pancreatitis (AP). The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with outcomes after PCD and develop a predictive model. METHOD AND MATERIALS: In a prospective observational study between July 2016 and Nov 2017, 101 consecutive AP patients were treated using a "step-up approach" in which PCD was used as the first step. We evaluated the association between success of PCD (survival without necrosectomy) and baseline parameters viz. etiology, demography, severity scores, C-reactive protein (CRP), and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), morphologic characteristics on computed tomography (CT) [percentage of necrosis, CT severity index (CTSI), characteristics of collection prior to PCD (volume, site and solid component of the collection), PCD parameters (initial size, maximum size, number and duration of drainage) and factors after PCD insertion (fall in IAP, reduction in volume of collection). RESULTS: Among 101 patients, 51 required PCD. The success rate of PCD was 66.66% (34/51). Four patients required additional surgical necrosectomy after PCD. Overall mortality was 29.4% (15/51). Multivariate analysis showed percentage of volume reduction of fluid collection (p = 0.016) and organ failure (OF) resolution (p = 0.023) after one week of PCD to be independent predictors of success of PCD. A predictive model based on these two factors resulted in area under curve (AUROC) of 0.915. Nomogram was developed with these two factors to predict the probability of success of PCD. CONCLUSION: Organ failure resolution and reduction in volume of collection after one week of PCD are significant predictors of successful PCD outcomes in patients with fluid collection following AP.

Use of steroids for abdominal tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of adjunctive steroids in abdominal tuberculosis is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effect of adjunctive use of steroids for abdominal tuberculosis in reducing/preventing complications. METHODS: We searched electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL) from inception to 25th June 2018 using the terms "abdominal tuberculosis" OR "intestinal tuberculosis" OR "peritoneal tuberculosis" OR "tuberculous peritonitis" AND steroids OR methylprednisolone OR prednisolone. Bibliography of potential articles was also searched. We included studies comparing adjunctive steroids to antitubercular therapy (ATT) alone. We excluded non-English articles, case reports, reviews and unrelated papers. The primary outcome was a comprehensive clinical outcome including need for surgery or the presence of symptomatic stricture (abdominal pain or intestinal obstruction). Quality assessment of included studies was done using ROBINS-I tool. Random-effects model was used to calculate the summary effect for all the outcomes. RESULTS: Of total 633 records, three studies on peritoneal tuberculosis were included in meta-analysis. These papers were of poor quality (one quasi-randomised study and two retrospective cohort studies). Meta-analyses showed adjunctive steroids, with ATT is more effective than ATT alone in tuberculous peritonitis patients for the prevention of composite end point (RR 0.15 [0.04, 0.62], p = 0.008), symptomatic stricture(RR 0.15 [0.04-0.62] p = 0.008) and intestinal obstruction (RR 0.18 [0.03-0.99] p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The data on use of steroids for abdominal tuberculosis are limited to peritoneal tuberculosis. Although steroids seem to have some benefit in patients of tubercular peritonitis, the poor quality of studies limits the generalisability of the findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016047347.