Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I administration on spontaneous and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-stimulated GH secretion in anorexia nervosa.

Exaggerated GH and reduced insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels are common features in anorexia nervosa (AN). A reduction of the negative IGF-I feedback could account, in part, for GH hypersecretion. To ascertain this, we studied the effects of recombinant human (rh)IGF-I on spontaneous and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in nine women with AN [body mass index, 14.1 +/- 0.6 kg/m2] and in weight matched controls (normal weight). Mean basal GH concentrations (mGHc) and GHRH (2.0 microg/kg, iv) stimulation were significantly higher in AN. rhIGF-I administration (20 microg/kg, sc) significantly reduced mGHc in AN (P < 0.01), but not normal weight, and inhibited peak GH response to GHRH in both groups; mGHc and peak GH, however, persisted at a significantly higher level in AN. Insulin, glucose, and IGFBP-1 basal levels were similar in both groups. rhIGF-I inhibited insulin in AN, whereas glucose remained unaffected in both groups. IGFBP-1 increased in both groups (P < 0.05), with significantly higher levels in AN. IGFBP-3 was under basal conditions at a lower level in AN (P < 0.05) and remained unaffected by rhIGF-I. This study demonstrates that a low rhIGF-I dose inhibits, but does not normalize, spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in AN, pointing also to the existence of a defective hypothalamic control of GH release. Moreover, the increased IGFBP-1 levels might curtail the negative IGF-I feedback in AN.

Arginine but not pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, enhances the GHRH-induced GH rise in patients with anorexia nervosa.

Pirenzepine, a muscarinic antagonist probably acting via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin release, abolishes the growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated growth hormone (GH) rise in normal subjects but only blunts it in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN). This finding suggested the existence in AN of an alteration of cholinergic system and/or somatostatinergic tone. To further investigate these mechanisms, in 11 AN women patients (age 18.8 +/- 0.9 years; BMI 13.4 +/- 0.4) we studied the GH response alone (1 microgram/Kg IV as a bolus at 0 min) and combined with pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg orally, 60 min before GHRH administration), a cholinesterase inhibitor, or arginine (ARG 30 g infused over 30 min starting at 0 min), two compounds probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) release. The GH response to GHRH preceded by a previous (120 min before) neurohormone administration also was studied. All these tests also were performed in 20 normal age-matched women (age 22.0 +/- 1.8 yrs; BMI20.1 +/- 2.4). Basal serum GH levels were higher in AN patients than in normal volunteers (NV) (10.3 +/- 3.4 versus 2.8 +/- 0.3 microgram/L; p < 0.001), whereas plasma IGF-I levels were lower in AN patients than in NV (43.3 +/- 10.6 versus 172.4 +/- 13.9 micrograms/L; p < 0.00001). In AN patients, GHRH administration induced a GH rise higher, though not significantly, than that in NV [delta area under the curve (AUC) 1173.6 +/- 167.6 versus 834.6 +/- 188.1 micrograms/L/h]. The GH response to the second of two consecutive GHRH boluses was lower (p < 0.01) than that of the first one either in AN patients or in NV (67.6 +/- 27.4 and 53.1 +/- 25.7 micrograms/L/h, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Corticotrophin-releasing hormone does not inhibit growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced release of growth hormone in control subjects but is effective in patients with eating disorders.

Previous studies have shown that corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) inhibits GH secretion in response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in normal women and men, and animal studies suggest that this effect is mediated by an increased release of somatostatin from the hypothalamus. It has been reported that there are abnormalities in the neuroendocrine regulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-somatotrophic axis and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in patients with eating disorders. The present study therefore investigated the ability of CRH to inhibit the GH response to GHRH in eight young women with anorexia nervosa (AN) and in seven young women with eating disorders which were not otherwise specified (NOS). We also compared the effect of CRH in the patients with the response it caused in ten control women. In contrast to a previous report, combined i.v. administration of 50 micrograms human CRH (hCRH) and 50 micrograms GHRH(1-29) caused a GH response in control women which was higher, although not significantly so, than that induced by GHRH alone (area under the curve (AUC) 988.5 +/- 506.0 compared with 1568.4 +/- 795.6 (S.E.M.) ng/ml per 120 min for GHRH alone and GHRH plus hCRH respectively). Conversely, the administration of hCRH given together with GHRH markedly inhibited the GH response induced by the latter in both AN patients (AUC 2253.0 +/- 385.7 compared with 1224.4 +/- 265.7 ng/ml per 120 min for GHRH and GHRH plus hCRH respectively; P < 0.005 and NOS patients (AUC 2827.4 +/- 281.1 compared with 308.5 +/- 183.4 ng/ml per 120 min for GHRH and GHRH plus hCRH respectively; P < 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)