La actigrafía como herramienta diagnóstica / ROLE OF ACTIGRAPHY IN THE STUDY OF SLEEP AND CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS : ACCURACY, SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF ACTIGRAPHY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SLEEP DISORDERS

El diagnóstico y tratamiento de los trastornos de sueño, especialmente los asociados al Ritmo Circadiano, utilizan métodos costosos, invasivos e incómodos tanto para los pacientes como para los médicos, quienes deben realizar un seguimiento de los hábitos de sueño. La actigrafía ha sido aceptada como una herramienta válida para el estudio y diagnóstico de trastornos circadianos. Más de 300 dispositivos se comercializan actualmente para el uso personal, pero pocos de estos han sido probados para un uso diagnóstico. En este estudio comparativo compuesto por 21 sujetos, se informa acerca de los patrones de sueño y actividad registrados por algunos dispositivos, como Micro-Mini Motionlogger Watch, Condor Act Trust, MisFit Flash y Fitbit Flex. No se observan diferencias significativas en el análisis del patrón de actividad de descanso entre dispositivos. Tampoco se observan para el sueño Onset (inicio), el Tiempo Total de Sueño y la Eficiencia del Sueño. Según el tipo de estudio y análisis deseado, éstos dispositivos pueden resultar alternativos para los registros de actividad y sueño.

This is a comparative analysis of actigraphy performance in comparison with different sleep Parameters. Actigraphy is a non-invasive and valid method of monitoring human rest activity cycles. The report describes the role of actigraphy to assess the study of sleep-wake patterns and circadian rhythms, evaluating its development as a diagnostic tool, with a comparative analysis of actigraphy performance in comparison with different sleep parameters. The diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders, especially those associated with the cicardian rhythm, employ very expensive costs, invasives or unconfortable for the patients the same as for physicians, who must perform a demand of the sleeping habits. The International Classification of Sleep Disorders has identified more than 80 sleep disorders, all of them have associated treatments. Actinography has been accepted as a valid tool for the study and diagnosis of circadian disorders. All these aspects are discussed in the article

Comparative analysis of actigraphy performance in healthy young subjects.

Sleep-related health disorders are increasing worldwide; diagnosis and treatment of such sleep diseases are commonly invasive and sometimes unpractical or expensive. Actigraphy has been recently introduced as a tool for the study of sleep and circadian disorders; however, there are several devices that claim to be useful for research and have not been thoroughly tested. This comparative study provides activity, sleep and temperature information regarding several of the most commonly used actigraphers: Micro-Mini Motion Logger; Act Trust; Misfit Flash; Fitbit Flex & Thermochron. Twenty-two healthy young subjects were assessed with five different commercial actigraphs (Micro-Mini Motionlogger Watch, Condor Act Trust, MisFit Flash and Fitbit Flex) and a temperature recorder (Thermochron), and also completed a sleep diary for a week. There were not significant differences in the analysis of rest-activity pattern between devices. Temperature rhythm comparison between the Act Trust and the Thermochron showed significant differences in rhythm percentage (p<0.05) and mesor (p<0.0563) but not in amplitude or acrophase. Although data accessibility and ease of use was very different for the diverse devices, there were no significant differences for sleep onset, total sleep time and sleep efficiency recordings, where applicable. In conclusion, depending on the type of study and analysis desired (as well as cost and compliance of use), we propose some relative advantages for the different actigraphy/temperature recording devices.