Strategies and outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in peripartum patients: a single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use in peripartum patients is rare, and there is a gap in the literature on the outcomes and guidance on using ECMO in peripartum patients. This study describes ECMO strategies our institution uses for peripartum patients and reports outcomes of ECMO use in peripartum patients with respiratory and/or cardiac failure. METHODS: A case series of all peripartum patients, defined as pregnant or up to 6 weeks after delivery of an infant >20 weeks gestation, from 2018 to 2023 from a single center requiring ECMO support. Patients were included if ECMO was initiated in the setting of cardiac, pulmonary, or combined failure. Patient demographics, operative details, ECMO data, and adverse outcomes for maternal, fetus, and neonates were all collected. RESULTS: Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The cohort had a mean maternal age of 30.7 years old and was racially diverse. A majority of this cohort tested positive for COVID-19 (n = 10, 55%). ECMO was a bridge to recovery for all patients, of whom 14 (78%) were discharged out of the hospital alive. No patients received transplantation or a durable mechanical device. The most common complications were infection (25%) and postpartum hemorrhage (22%). CONCLUSIONS: ECMO use in peripartum patients in a single tertiary center was associated with a high survival rate. Furthermore, a strong multidisciplinary team, careful reevaluation of clinical trajectory, and consideration of complications and risks associated with using ECMO in peripartum patients are possible frameworks to use when challenged with critically ill peripartum patients.

Early initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improves survival in adult trauma patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the trauma population has been reported to have a mortality benefit in patients with severe refractory hypoxic respiratory failure. This study compares the early initiation of ECMO for the management of severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) versus a historical control immediately preceding the use of ECMO for trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a single verified Level I trauma center. The study population was limited to trauma patients diagnosed with severe ARDS using the Berlin definition (PaO2/FIO2 ratio < 100). Patients managed with ECMO versus conventional ventilation (CONV) were compared. The primary outcome of interest was mortality; secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, intensive care unit-free days, and ventilator-free days. RESULTS: Fifteen ECMO patients managed from March 2013 to November 2014 were identified, as were 14 CONV patients managed from March 2012 to February 2013 who met the Berlin definition of severe ARDS. Data related to age, Injury Severity Scores (ISSs), admission lactic acid levels, base deficit, the number of transfused red blood cell units within the first 24 hours, and presence of severe traumatic brain injury were collected and were not statistically different between the groups. Likewise, Murray Lung Injury (MLI), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores determined at the onset of severe ARDS were not statistically different between the groups. Median hospital stay (CONV, 28.0 days [14.0-47.0]; ECMO, 43.5 days [30.0-93.0]; p = 0.15), intensive care unit-free days (CONV, 0.0 days [0.0-5.0]; ECMO, 5.0 days [0.0-7.0]; p = 0.26), and ventilator-free days (CONV, 0.0 days [0.0-10.0]; ECMO, 8.0 days [0.0-19.0]; p = 0.13) were not statistically different between the groups. Mortality in the ECMO group was significantly reduced compared with the CONV group (ECMO, 13.3%; CONV, 64%; p = 0.01). Timing from the onset of severe ARDS to ECMO intervention occurred at a mean 1.9 ± 1.4 days. CONCLUSION: Patients who were treated with ECMO for severe ARDS had an improved mortality compared with historical controls. ECMO should be considered at the early onset of severe ARDS to improve survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Flexible Bronchoscopy Is Safe and Effective in Adult Subjects Supported With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated the safety of flexible bronchoscopy (FB) in mechanically ventilated subjects. However, the safety of FB in adult subjects receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has not been described previously. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all adult subjects who underwent FB while receiving ECMO support at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014. Physiologic variables, pre- and post-FB ECMO, and ventilator settings were recorded. RESULTS: 79 adult subjects underwent FB receiving ECMO with a total of 223 bronchoscopies. The most common indications for bronchoscopy included diagnostic evaluation of infection in subjects with pneumonia (29%) and clearance of excessive secretions (22%). In 70% of subjects, moderate or greater amounts of secretions were noted. FB yielded positive culture data in 37 subjects (47%), which resulted in a change to the antibiotic regimen in 14 subjects (38%) with positive culture data. No significant differences in mean PaO2 /FIO2 , mean ECMO flow, mean sweep gas, ventilator settings, or hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, oxygen saturation, and mean blood pressure) were noted before and after FB. Complications were mild and transient: blood-tinged secretions after FB in 21% cases, which resolved spontaneously, intraprocedural hypoxemia in 2.2% of cases, and dysrhythmia in <1% of cases. There were no episodes of ECMO cannula dislodgement or inadvertent extubation. CONCLUSIONS: FB can be used safely in adult subjects supported with ECMO and is not associated with significant hemodynamics changes, bleeding, or mechanical complications during ECMO support.

Modern use of extracorporeal life support in pregnancy and postpartum.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use during pregnancy and the postpartum period are thought to be associated with an increased risk for maternal or fetal bleeding complications. We present our recent institutional experience in managing pregnant and postpartum patients with ECMO. We also performed a literature review of modern use of ECMO in pregnant and postpartum patients utilizing Pubmed and Embase databases. ECMO was used for severe cardiopulmonary failure due to multiple conditions. Based on published reports, overall maternal and fetal survival on ECMO were 80% and 70%, respectively. Mild-to-moderate vaginal bleeding was reported in a few cases, with rare occurrences of catastrophic postpartum hemorrhage. There was no consensus on an optimal anticoagulation strategy in these patients, though most preferred to keep anticoagulation at lower therapeutic levels. We conclude that ECMO, in well-selected pregnant and postpartum patients, appears to be safe and associated with low risk of maternal and fetal complications.