RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The standard method for assessing chronic renal damage is renal biopsy, which has limitations due to its invasiveness. Ultrasound elastography is a non-invasive technique that quantifies tissue elasticity and can be used to determine Young's modulus (YM). Although this breakthrough technology has been successfully employed to evaluate liver stiffness and the extent of fibrosis, its application in kidney-related conditions still needs improvement. METHODS: Our study aimed to verify the correlation between renal elastography and the chronic histological score determined via renal biopsy, evaluate the correlation between elastography and response to treatment in the short-term follow-up (6 months), and compare elastography data between renal disease patients (AKD-P) and healthy controls (HP). RESULTS: The analyzed population consisted of 82 patients (41 HP and 41 AKD-P). The AKD-P were divided into responders (R) or non-responders (NR) based on the criteria established by the guidelines. No association was found between renal stiffness and chronic histological score. Elastography data revealed median YM values of 6.15 kPa for AKD-P and 12.2 kPa for HP, with a statistically significant difference. The median YM values of the R and NR groups were 7.4 KPa and 5.6 KPa, respectively (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Patient responsiveness was associated with YM, with lower values observed in the NR group. We also found that the healthy controls exhibited significantly higher YM values than the renal disease population.
RESUMO
Background: The main purpose of our study was to evaluate the ability of renal functional reserve (RFR) to stratify the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) occurrence within 100 days of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and to predict any functional recovery or the onset of chronic kidney disease. A secondary aim was to identify the clinical/laboratory risk factors for the occurrence of AKI. Methods: The study design is prospective observational. We enrolled 48 patients with normal basal glomerular filtration rate (bGFR) who underwent allogenic HSCT. A multiparameter assessment and the Renal Functional Reserve Test (RFR-T) using an oral protein load stress test were performed 15 days before the HSCT. Results: Different RFRs corresponded to the same bGFR values. Of 48 patients, 29 (60%) developed AKI. Comparing the AKI group with the group that did not develop AKI, no statistically significant difference emerged in any characteristic related to demographic, clinical or multiparameter assessment variables except for the estimated GFR (eGFR). eGFR ≤100 mL/min/1.73 m2 was significantly related to the risk of developing AKI (Fisher's exact test, P = .001). Moreover, RFR-T was lower in AKI+ patients vs AKI- patients, but did not allow statistical significance (28% vs 40%). In AKI patients, RFR >20% was associated with complete functional recovery (one-sided Fisher's exact test, P = .041). The risk of failure to recover increases significantly when RFR ≤20% (odds ratio = 5.50, 95% confidence interval = 1.06-28.4). Conclusion: RFR identifies subclinical functional deterioration conditions essential for post-AKI recovery. In our cohort of patients with no kidney disease (NKD), the degree of pre-HSCT eGFR is associated with AKI risk, and a reduction in pre-HSCT RFR above a threshold of 20% is related to complete renal functional recovery post-AKI. Identifying eGFR first and RFR second could help select patients who might benefit from changes in transplant management or early nephrological assessment.
