Context contingent signal processing in the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus during gaze saccades.

The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) functions to stabilize gaze when the head moves. The flocculus region (FLR) of the cerebellar cortex, which includes the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus, plays an essential role in modifying signal processing in VOR pathways so that images of interest remain stable on the retina. In squirrel monkeys, the firing rate of most FLR Pk cells is modulated during VOR eye movements evoked by passive movement of the head. In this study, the responses of 48 FLR Purkinje cells, the firing rates of which were strongly modulated during VOR evoked by passive whole body rotation or passive head-on-trunk rotation, were compared to the responses generated during compensatory VOR eye movements evoked by the active head movements of eye-head saccades. Most (42/48) of the Purkinje cells were insensitive to eye-head saccade-related VOR eye movements. A few (6/48) generated bursts of spikes during saccade-related VOR but only during on-direction eye movements. Considered as a population FLR Pk cells were <5% as responsive to the saccade-related VOR as they were to the VOR evoked by passive head movements. The observations suggest that the FLR has little influence on signal processing in VOR pathways during eye-head saccade-related VOR eye movements. We conclude that the image-stabilizing signals generated by the FLR are highly dependent on the behavioral context and are called on primarily when external forces unrelated to self-generated eye and head movements are the cause of image instability.

Complex spike activity in the flocculus signals more than the eye can see.

Modulation of the complex spike activity of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus can convey not only visual signals but also nonvisual signals. The nonvisual complex spike modulation, which is readily observed with vestibular stimulation of the awake rabbit in darkness, is approximately in-phase with the concomitant simple spike modulation. This nonreciprocal relationship contrasts to the reciprocal relationship found when the rabbit is afforded vision.

The neurophysiological substrate for the cervico-ocular reflex in the squirrel monkey.

Passive rotation of the trunk with respect to the head evoked cervico-ocular reflex (COR) eye movements in squirrel monkeys. The amplitude of the reflex varied both within and between animals, but the eye movements were always in the same direction as trunk rotation. In the dark, the COR typically had a gain of 0.3-0.4. When animals fixated earth-stationary targets during low-frequency passive neck rotation or actively tracked moving visual targets with head movements, the COR was suppressed. The COR and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) summed during passive head-on-trunk rotation producing compensatory eye movements whose gain was greater than 1.0. The firing behavior of VOR-related vestibular neurons and cerebellar flocculus Purkinje cells was studied during the COR. Passive neck rotation produced changes in firing rate related to neck position and/or neck velocity in both position-vestibular-pause neurons and eye-head-vestibular neurons, although the latter neurons were much more sensitive to the COR than the former. The neck rotation signals were reduced or reversed in direction when the COR was suppressed. Flocculus Purkinje cells were relatively insensitive to COR eye movements. However, when the COR was suppressed, their firing rate was modulated by neck rotation. These neck rotation signals summed with ocular pursuit signals when the head was used to pursue targets. We suggest that the neural substrate that produces the COR includes central VOR pathways, and that the flocculus plays an important role in suppressing the reflex when it would cause relative movement of a visual target on the retina.

Role of the cerebellar flocculus region in cancellation of the VOR during passive whole body rotation.

A series of studies were carried out to investigate the role of the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus in the ability to voluntarily cancel the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Squirrel monkeys were trained to pursue moving visual targets and to fixate a head stationary or earth stationary target during passive whole body rotation (WBR). The firing behavior of 187 horizontal eye movement-related Purkinje (Pk) cells in the flocculus region was recorded during smooth pursuit eye movements and during WBR. Half of the Pk cells encountered were eye velocity Pk cells whose firing rates were related to eye movements during smooth pursuit and WBR. Their sensitivity to eye velocity during WBR was reduced when a visual target was not present, and their response to unpredictable steps in WBR was delayed by 80-100 ms, which suggests that eye movement sensitivity depended on visual feedback. They were insensitive to WBR when the VOR was canceled. The other half of the Purkinje cells encountered were sensitive to eye velocity during pursuit and to head velocity during VOR cancellation. They resembled the gaze velocity Pk cells previously described in rhesus monkeys. The head velocity signal tended to be less than half as large as the eye velocity-related signal and was observable at a short ( approximately 40 ms) latency when the head was unpredictably accelerated during ongoing VOR cancellation. Gaze and eye velocity type Pk cells were found to be intermixed throughout the ventral paraflocculus and flocculus. Most gaze velocity Pk cells (76%) were sensitive to ipsilateral eye and head velocity, but nearly half (48%) of the eye velocity Pk cells were sensitive to contralateral eye velocity. Thus the output of flocculus region is modified in two ways during cancellation of the VOR. Signals related to both ipsilateral and contralateral eye velocity are removed, and in approximately half of the cells a relatively weak head velocity signal is added. Unilateral injections of muscimol into the flocculus region had little effect on the gain of the VOR evoked either in the presence or absence of visual targets. However, ocular pursuit velocity and the ability to suppress the VOR by fixating a head stationary target were reduced by approximately 50%. These observations suggest that the flocculus region is an essential part of the neural substrate for both visual feedback-dependent and nonvisual mechanisms for canceling the VOR during passive head movements.

Role of the cerebellar flocculus region in the coordination of eye and head movements during gaze pursuit.

The contribution of the flocculus region of the cerebellum to horizontal gaze pursuit was studied in squirrel monkeys. When the head was free to move, the monkeys pursued targets with a combination of smooth eye and head movements; with the majority of the gaze velocity produced by smooth tracking head movements. In the accompanying study we reported that the flocculus region was necessary for cancellation of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) evoked by passive whole body rotation. The question addressed in this study was whether the flocculus region of the cerebellum also plays a role in canceling the VOR produced by active head movements during gaze pursuit. The firing behavior of 121 Purkinje (Pk) cells that were sensitive to horizontal smooth pursuit eye movements was studied. The sample included 66 eye velocity Pk cells and 55 gaze velocity Pk cells. All of the cells remained sensitive to smooth pursuit eye movements during combined eye and head tracking. Eye velocity Pk cells were insensitive to smooth pursuit head movements. Gaze velocity Pk cells were nearly as sensitive to active smooth pursuit head movements as they were passive whole body rotation; but they were less than half as sensitive ( approximately 43%) to smooth pursuit head movements as they were to smooth pursuit eye movements. Considered as a whole, the Pk cells in the flocculus region of the cerebellar cortex were <20% as sensitive to smooth pursuit head movements as they were to smooth pursuit eye movements, which suggests that this region does not produce signals sufficient to cancel the VOR during smooth head tracking. The comparative effect of injections of muscimol into the flocculus region on smooth pursuit eye and head movements was studied in two monkeys. Muscimol inactivation of the flocculus region profoundly affected smooth pursuit eye movements but had little effect on smooth pursuit head movements or on smooth tracking of visual targets when the head was free to move. We conclude that the signals produced by flocculus region Pk cells are neither necessary nor sufficient to cancel the VOR during gaze pursuit.

Firing behavior of vestibular neurons during active and passive head movements: vestibulo-spinal and other non-eye-movement related neurons.

The firing behavior of 51 non-eye movement related central vestibular neurons that were sensitive to passive head rotation in the plane of the horizontal semicircular canal was studied in three squirrel monkeys whose heads were free to move in the horizontal plane. Unit sensitivity to active head movements during spontaneous gaze saccades was compared with sensitivity to passive head rotation. Most units (29/35 tested) were activated at monosynaptic latencies following electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nerve. Nine were vestibulo-spinal units that were antidromically activated following electrical stimulation of the ventromedial funiculi of the spinal cord at C1. All of the units were less sensitive to active head movements than to passive whole body rotation. In the majority of cells (37/51, 73%), including all nine identified vestibulo-spinal units, the vestibular signals related to active head movements were canceled. The remaining units (n = 14, 27%) were sensitive to active head movements, but their responses were attenuated by 20-75%. Most units were nearly as sensitive to passive head-on-trunk rotation as they were to whole body rotation; this suggests that vestibular signals related to active head movements were cancelled primarily by subtraction of a head movement efference copy signal. The sensitivity of most units to passive whole body rotation was unchanged during gaze saccades. A fundamental feature of sensory processing is the ability to distinguish between self-generated and externally induced sensory events. Our observations suggest that the distinction is made at an early stage of processing in the vestibular system.

Contribution of the cerebellar flocculus to gaze control during active head movements.

The flocculus and ventral paraflocculus are adjacent regions of the cerebellar cortex that are essential for controlling smooth pursuit eye movements and for altering the performance of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). The question addressed in this study is whether these regions of the cerebellum are more globally involved in controlling gaze, regardless of whether eye or active head movements are used to pursue moving visual targets. Single-unit recordings were obtained from Purkinje (Pk) cells in the floccular region of squirrel monkeys that were trained to fixate and pursue small visual targets. Cell firing rate was recorded during smooth pursuit eye movements, cancellation of the VOR, combined eye-head pursuit, and spontaneous gaze shifts in the absence of targets. Pk cells were found to be much less sensitive to gaze velocity during combined eye-head pursuit than during ocular pursuit. They were not sensitive to gaze or head velocity during gaze saccades. Temporary inactivation of the floccular region by muscimol injection compromised ocular pursuit but had little effect on the ability of monkeys to pursue visual targets with head movements or to cancel the VOR during active head movements. Thus the signals produced by Pk cells in the floccular region are necessary for controlling smooth pursuit eye movements but not for coordinating gaze during active head movements. The results imply that individual functional modules in the cerebellar cortex are less involved in the global organization and coordination of movements than with parametric control of movements produced by a specific part of the body.

A non-visual mechanism for voluntary cancellation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Squirrel monkeys were trained to cancel their vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) by fixating a visual target that was head stationary during passive vestibular stimulation. The monkeys were seated on a vestibular turntable, and their heads were restrained. A small visual target (0.2 degrees) was projected from the vestibular turntable onto a tangent screen. The monkeys' ability to suppress their VOR by fixating a head stationary target while the turntable was moving was compared to their ability to pursue the target when it was moved in the same manner. Squirrel monkeys were better able to suppress their VOR when the turntable was moved at high velocities than they were able to pursue targets that were moving at high velocities. The gaze velocity gain during VOR cancellation began to decrease when the head velocity was above 80 degrees/s, and was greater than 0.6 when the head velocity was above 150 degrees/s. However, gaze velocity gain during smooth pursuit decreased significantly when the target velocity was greater than 60 degrees/s, and was less than 0.4 when the target velocity was 150 degrees/s or more. The latency of VOR suppression was significantly shorter than the latency of smooth pursuit while the monkey was cancelling its VOR. When an unpredictable step change in head acceleration was generated while the monkey was cancelling its VOR, the VOR evoked by the head acceleration step began to be suppressed shortly after the initiation of the step (approximately 30 ms). On the other hand, the latency of the smooth pursuit eye movement elicited when the visual target was accelerated in the same manner during VOR cancellation was approximately 100 ms. The comparison between these two results suggests that the monkeys did not use visual information related to target motion to suppress their VOR at an early latency. The monkeys' ability to suppress the VOR evoked by an unexpected change in head acceleration depended on the size of the head acceleration step. The VOR evoked by unexpected step changes in head acceleration was progressively less suppressed at an early latency as the size of the acceleration step increased, and was not suppressed at an early latency when the step change in head acceleration was greater than 500 degrees/s2. During smooth pursuit eye movements, unexpected step changes in head acceleration evoked a VOR that was suppressed at an early latency (approximately 50 ms) if the head movement was in the same direction as the ongoing smooth pursuit eye movement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)