Effect of prestroke antiplatelets use on first-ever ischaemic stroke severity and early outcome.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate whether prior use of antiplatelet agents (AP) may be associated with lower severity and improved short-term outcome of the first-ever acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-control study based on a prospective hospital stroke registry covering consecutive acute stroke patients admitted to a single stroke centre in highly urbanised area (Warsaw, Poland) between 1995 and 2013. Patients receiving oral anticoagulants were excluded from the analysis. Statistical analysis included multiple regression and logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, diabetes, coronary heart disease and history of myocardial infarction. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 3036 eligible patients, of whom 879 (29%) received AP before stroke onset. Patients from the AP group were older and more often burdened with stroke risk factors. There were no differences in baseline stroke severity, hospital mortality and proportion of patients alive and independent at discharge. However, AP turned out to be independently associated with lower NIHSS score on admission (ß = -0.045, p = 0.008) and increased odds for being alive and independent at discharge (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.67) and decreased odds for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI: 0.59-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide further evidence supporting modest benefit of AP therapy on the course and outcome of first-ever ischaemic stroke. Further large studies are needed to confirm this effect.

The prestroke use of vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation - trends over 15 years.

BACKGROUND: Effective anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is the standard of stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Although, everyday practice is becoming increasingly guideline-driven, proper anticoagulation is still problematic. We aimed to investigate changes in the use of VKAs for stroke prevention in patients with AF admitted because of acute stroke over a period of 15 years. METHODS: We analysed consecutive acute stroke patients admitted to our centre between June 1995 and December 2010. Data were prospectively collected in a detailed stroke registry. We distinguished between three periods: 1995-2000 (used as reference for comparisons), 2001-2005 and 2006-2010. RESULTS: The AF rate prior to stroke was similar in ischaemic stroke patients (1995-2000: 25%, 2001-2005: 24%, 2006-2010: 24%) but increased in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (6%, 11%, 19%, p = 0.003 since 2006). The proportion of patients with AF using VKAs before stroke has became higher in ischaemic stroke (10%, 16%, 28%, p < 0.001 since 2006) with non-significant trend in ICH (0%, 33%, 45%). The proportion of ischaemic strokes occurring in patients with AF using VKAs with INR < 2 tended to increase over time (58%, 83%, 80.3%). There was also tendency towards increasing proportion of ICHs occurring in patients with AF over treated with VKAs (INR > 3). CONCLUSIONS: The prescription rate of VKA for stroke prevention appears to be improving. However, because of a high proportion of patients on non-therapeutic INR, the proportion of cardioembolic ischaemic strokes remains stable. It may suggest that everyday use of VKAs is still far from optimal.