Comparative study of two complementary proliferation markers in 200 breast carcinomas: Ki67 and mitotic index.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the proliferation in the mammary carcinomas provides useful prognostic and predictive information for subsequent management. The purely morphological evaluation of proliferative activity was represented by the evaluation of mitotic index. New analytical methods were gradually developed and performed. Among these methods, evaluation of Ki67 by immunohistochemistry is particularly interesting. Its expression is significantly increased in the cell cycle. AIM: To correlate the mitotic index as a classic method of assessing cell proliferation and Ki 67 proliferation index detected by immunohistochemistry to identify the most reliable proliferative marker. METHODS: We studied 200 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma breast over a period of 12 months of 2014. We identified in each case the SBR grade, Ki67 proliferation index and the mitotic index. Correlation between the two parameters was identified using the Spearman test. A result is considered significant when p < 0.01. The distribution of these markers by SBR gradewas studied using the ANOVA method. RESULTS: Ki67 is significantly correlated to the mitotic index. Although these two methods are dependent, Ki67 is the most sensitive and bonded to SBR grade. Determination of Ki67 provides interesting information that could replace the mitotic account. It provides reliable and reproducible data that can be incorporated into a prognostic score. CONCLUSION: Ki67 is a more efficient marker mitotic index, reflecting the cell proliferation.

Mucinous breast carcinoma a rare entity to be known: clinico-pathological study of 48 cases.

BACKGROUND: Mucinous carcinoma is a particular type of breast cancer characterized by the presence of extracellular mucin and is linked with a more favorable prognosis than invasive breast carcinoma of no special type. It accounts for 1 to 7% of all breast cancers. We propose in this work to study at first the clinic-pathological characteristics and the evolution of 48 cases of mucinous carcinomas. Secondly, we propose to identify through a review of recent literature, the therapeutic management of these carcinomas. METHODS: This is a retrospective study, conducted in Salah Azaiez carcinological institute, interesting 48 cases of mucinous carcinoma collected over 19 years. Clinical, radiological and pathological information were collected from medical records. RESULTS: The mean age of our patients was 57 years. The tumor was single in 41 cases and in 7 cases bifocal. Mammographic aspects were favor of malignancy in 33 cases (75%). It was mixed subtype in 14 cases and pure in 34 cases. Lymph node involvement was noted in 14 cases. The number of metastatic lymph nodes ranged from 1 to 11 with an average of 3. Hormone receptors were positive in 35 tumors (73%). The HER2 showed overexpression in 5 cases. Surgery consisted of a radical treatment for thirty-two patients (66%). Overall survival at 5 years was 75.3% and 59.3% at 10 years. Disease-free survival was 74% at 5 years and 58% at 10 years. CONCLUSION: Mucinous carcinoma consists of two distinct subtypes: pure and mixed with different prognosis. Larger data samples with longer follow-up are necessary to achieve an improved understanding of this particular tumor.

Comparative study of two complementary proliferation markers in 200 breast carcinomas: Ki67 and mitotic index.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the proliferation in the mammary carcinomas provides useful prognostic and predictive information for subsequent management. The purely morphological evaluation of proliferative activity was represented by the evaluation of mitotic index. New analytical methods were gradually developed and performed. Among these methods, evaluation of Ki67 by immunohistochemistry is particularly interesting. Its expression is significantly increased in the cell cycle. AIM: To correlate the mitotic index as a classic method of assessing cell proliferation and Ki 67 proliferation index detected by immunohistochemistry to identify the most reliable proliferative marker. METHODS: We studied 200 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma breast over a period of 12 months of 2014. We identified in each case the SBR grade, Ki67 proliferation index and the mitotic index. Correlation between the two parameters was identified using the Spearman test. A result is considered significant when p < 0.01. The distribution of these markers by SBR gradewas studied using the ANOVA method. RESULTS: Ki67 is significantly correlated to the mitotic index. Although these two methods are dependent, Ki67 is the most sensitive and bonded to SBR grade. Determination of Ki67 provides interesting information that could replace the mitotic account. It provides reliable and reproducible data that can be incorporated into a prognostic score. CONCLUSION: Ki67 is a more efficient marker mitotic index, reflecting the cell proliferation.