RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether hysteroscopy improved upon the diagnostic sensitivity of dilatation and curettage (D+C) in the detection of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients undergoing hysteroscopy/D+C for abnormal uterine bleeding between 1991 and 1995. Hysteroscopic impressions and D+C diagnoses were compared. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-three patients were included in the study. Of the 61 patients with D+C demonstrating hyperplasia, the hysteroscopic impression was hyperplasia in 32 (52%). Of the 10 patients with D+C demonstrating carcinoma, the hysteroscopic impression was hyperplasia in 8 (80%) and carcinoma in 2 (20%). Two additional cases of carcinoma were diagnosed within 6 months of hysteroscopy/D+C, and both had been missed on both hysteroscopy and D+C. Of 204 patients with a normal hysteroscopic impression, 23 (11%) had hyperplasia on D+C. CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopy did not improve upon the sensitivity of D+C in the detection of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma.
