Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
CMAJ Open ; 10(3): E848-E855, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167420

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2018, Ontario implemented a pharmacare program (Ontario Health Insurance Plan Plus [OHIP+]) to provide children and youth younger than 25 years with full coverage for prescription medications in the provincial formulary. We aimed to assess the use of public drug plans and costs of publicly covered prescriptions before and after the program's implementation and modification. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, interrupted time-series analysis using data on prescription drug claims, from the Canadian Institute for Health Information's National Prescription Drug Utilization Information System, for people younger than 25 years from January 2016 to October 2019 in Ontario, using British Columbia as the control. We assessed changes in the level and trend of publicly covered prescriptions and expenditures after the introduction of OHIP+ in January 2018 and after program modifications in April 2019. We also assessed plan use and expenditures for publicly covered prescriptions for diabetes and asthma. RESULTS: Publicly covered prescriptions in Ontario increased by 290%, from 756 per 1000 people before OHIP+ to 2952 per 1000 (p < 0.001) after its implementation. After program modification, prescriptions decreased by 52% to 1421 per 1000 (p < 0.001). Similarly, total public drug expenditures increased by 254%, from $379 million in 2017 to $839 million in 2018, then reduced by 49% to $204 million in 2019. Monthly public plan expenditures increased by $115.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] $100.93 to $130.94) post-OHIP+ implementation and decreased by $99.97 (95% CI -$119.79 to -$80.15) per person per month after April 2019. INTERPRETATION: Adopting OHIP+ increased use of public drug plans and expenditures for publicly funded prescription medicines, and the program modification was associated with decreases in both outcomes. This study's findings can inform the national pharmacare debate; future research should investigate associations with health outcomes.


Assuntos
Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Adolescente , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , Criança , Custos e Análise de Custo , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico
2.
Diabetes Metab ; 41(3): 231-8, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25976701

RESUMO

AIM: The study compared the duration of maintenance of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using dual therapy with either metformin and sitagliptin (M-Sita) or metformin and a sulphonylurea (M-SU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study included adult patients with T2D who had responded inadequately to metformin monotherapy and therefore had started de-novo treatment with Met-Sita or Met-SU within the previous eight weeks. Patient follow-up and changes to treatment were performed according to their general practitioner's usual clinical practice. The primary outcome was time to change in treatment for whatever cause. HbA1c and symptomatic hypoglycaemia were also documented. RESULTS: The median treatment duration for patients in the M-Sita group (43.2 months) was significantly longer (P < 0.0001) than in the M-SU group (20.2 months). This difference persisted after adjusting for baseline differences and confounders. A similar reduction in HbA1c was noted in both arms (-0.6%), and the incidence of hypoglycaemia prior to treatment modification was lower with M-Sita (9.7%) than with M-SU (21.0%). Adverse events potentially related to treatment were reported in 2.8% (n = 52) and 2.7% (n = 20) of patients in the M-Sita and M-SU arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Under everyday conditions of primary diabetes care, dual therapy with M-Sita can be maintained for longer than M-SU. In addition, while efficacy, as measured by changes in HbA1c, was similar between treatments, the incidence of hypoglycaemia was lower in patients taking M-Sita.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Fosfato de Sitagliptina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Metformina/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fosfato de Sitagliptina/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2004: 3800-3, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17271123

RESUMO

Recent generalization of stent implantation in interventional cardiology require full understanding of blood flow cartography. Interdepency between fluid stresses and in vivo cells covering lumen artery are regularly accused to be one of the instigator of neointimal proliferation (thickening of the inner layer of blood vessels) and mid-term restenosis. This study purpose to numericaly investigate the three dimensional flow in vicinity of an endoprothesis. We used a finite element method to simulate a steady flow of non-Newtonian fluid in a coronary artery using a rigid wall approximation. Results on the velocities, wall shear stress and wall shear stress gradients are presented. Theses simulations allow identification of stagnation site and low wall shear stress area that may be prone to clot formation and neointimal hyperplasia. Intra stent flow knowledge can potentially contribute to optimization of prothesis design and decreasing second intervention rate.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...