MidCog study: a prospective, observational cohort study investigating health literacy, self-management skills and cognitive function in middle-aged adults.

INTRODUCTION: The lack of definitive means to prevent or treat cognitive impairment or dementia is driving intense efforts to identify causal mechanisms. Recent evidence suggests clinically meaningful declines in cognition might present as early as middle age. Studying cognitive changes in middle adulthood could elucidate modifiable factors affecting later cognitive and health outcomes, yet few cognitive ageing studies include this age group. The purpose of the MidCog study is to begin investigations of less-studied and potentially modifiable midlife determinants of later life cognitive outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MidCog is a prospective cohort study of adults ages 35-64, with two in-person interviews 2.5 years apart. Data will be collected from interviews, electronic health records and pharmacy fill data. Measurements will include health literacy, self-management skills, cognitive function, lifestyle and health behaviours, healthcare use, health status and chronic disease outcomes. Associations of health literacy and self-management skills with health behaviours and cognitive/health outcomes will be examined in a series of regression models, and moderating effects of modifiable psychosocial factors.Finally, MidCog data will be linked to an ongoing, parallel cohort study of older adults recruited at ages 55-74 in 2008 ('LitCog'; ages 70-90 in 2023), to explore associations between age, health literacy, self-management skills, chronic diseases, health status and cognitive function among adults ages 35-90. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University has approved the MidCog study protocol (STU00214736). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the funders of the study as well as patients.

Trajectories of Sleep Disturbance and Self-Management of Chronic Conditions during COVID-19 among Middle-aged and Older Adults.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a widespread impact on sleep quality, yet little is known about the prevalence of sleep disturbance and its impact on self-management of chronic conditions during the ongoing pandemic. Objective: To evaluate trajectories of sleep disturbance, and their associations with one's capacity to self-manage chronic conditions. Design: A longitudinal cohort study linked to 3 active clinical trials and 2 cohort studies with 5 time points of sleep data collection (July 15, 2020 - May 23, 2022). Participants: Adults living with chronic conditions who completed sleep questionnaires for two or more time points. Exposure: Trajectories of self-reported sleep disturbance across 5 time points. Main Outcomes: 3 self-reported measures of self-management capacity, including subjective cognitive decline, medication adherence, and self-efficacy for managing chronic disease. Results: 549 adults aged 23 to 91 years were included in the analysis. Two thirds had 3 or more chronic conditions; 42.4% of participants followed a trajectory of moderate or high likelihood of persistent sleep disturbance across the study period. Moderate or high likelihood of sleep disturbance was associated with older age (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.09, 2.26, P<.05), persistent stress (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16, 2.06, P=.003), poorer physical function (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.17, 2.13, P=.003), greater anxiety (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.04, 1.87, P=.03) and depression (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.20, 2.22, P=.002). Moderate or high likelihood of sleep disturbance was also independently associated with subjective cognitive decline, poorer medication adherence, and worse self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases (all P<.001). Conclusions: Persistent sleep disturbance during the pandemic may be an important risk factor for inadequate chronic disease self-management and potentially poor health outcomes in adults living with chronic conditions. Public health and health system strategies might consider monitoring sleep quality in adults with chronic conditions to optimize health outcomes.

Prevalence and risk factors of sleep disturbance in adults with underlying health conditions during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

To determine the prevalence of sleep disturbance during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among US adults who are more vulnerable to complications because of age and co-morbid conditions, and to identify associated sociodemographic and psychosocial factors. Cross-sectional survey linked to 3 active clinical trials and 2 cohort studies, conducted between 11/30/2020 and 3/3/2021. Five academic internal medicine practices and 2 federally qualified health centers. A total of 715 adults ages 23 to 91 years living with one or more chronic conditions. A fifth (20%) of participants reported poor sleep. Black adults were twice as likely to report poor sleep compared to Whites. Self-reported poor physical function (51%), stress (42%), depression (28%), and anxiety (36%) were also common and all significantly associated with poor sleep. Age ≥70 years and having been vaccinated for COVID-19 were protective against poor sleep. Sex, education, income, alcohol use, and employment status were not significantly associated with sleep quality. In this diverse sample of adults with chronic conditions, by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, disparities in sleep health amid the ongoing pandemic were apparent. Worse physical function and mental health were associated with poor sleep and should be considered targets for health system interventions to prevent the many subsequent consequences of disturbed sleep on health outcomes. Measurements: self-reported sleep quality, physical function, stress, depression, and anxiety.

Longitudinal Investigation of Older Adults' Ability to Self-Manage Complex Drug Regimens.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate older patients' ability to correctly and efficiently dose multidrug regimens over nearly a decade and to explore factors predicting declines in medication self-management. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study funded by the National Institute on Aging. SETTING: One academic internal medicine clinic and six community health centers. PARTICIPANTS: Beginning in 2008, 900 English-speaking adults, aged 55 to 74 years, were enrolled in the study, completing a baseline (T1) assessment. To date, 303 participants have completed the same assessment 9 years postbaseline (T4). MEASUREMENTS: At T1, subjects were given a standardized, seven-drug regimen and asked to demonstrate how they would take medicine over 24 hours. The number of dosing errors made and times per day that a participant would take medicine were recorded. Health literacy was measured via the Newest Vital Sign, and cognitive decline was measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination. RESULTS: Participants on average made 2.9 dosing errors (SD = 2.5 dosing errors; range = 0-21 dosing errors) of 21 potential errors at T1 and 5.0 errors (SD = 2.1 errors; range = 1-18 errors; P < .001) at T4. In a multivariate model, limited literacy (ß = .69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .18-1.20; P = .01), meaningful cognitive decline (ß = 1.72; 95% CI = .70-2.74; P = .01), number of chronic conditions (ß = .21; 95% CI = .07-.34; P = .01), and number of baseline dosing errors (ß = -.76; 95% CI = -.85 to -.67; P < .001) were significant, independent predictors of changes in dosing errors. Most patients overcomplicated their daily medication schedule; no sociodemographic characteristics were predictive of poor regimen organization in multivariate models. In a multivariate model, there were no significant predictors of changes in regimen consolidation over time, except regimen consolidation at T1. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients frequently overcomplicated drug regimens and increasingly made more dosing errors over 9 years of follow-up. Patients with limited literacy, cognitive decline, and multimorbidity were at greatest risk for errors. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:569-575, 2020.