[Does the announcement of cancer at the time of Non Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer diagnosis affect quality of life and adherence of patients? Data from the French prospective cohort VICAN]. / L'annonce du cancer au diagnostic de Tumeur de vessie non infiltrant le muscle modifie-t-elle la qualité de vie et l'observance des patients ? Données de la cohorte prospective française VICAN.

INTRODUCTION: The information provided at the time of diagnosis of Non Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) is highly variable. Well-informed patient are more involved in shared decisions. The objective of our study was to assess the information perceived by the patient at the time of NMIBC diagnosis and its impact on quality of life. METHODS: The VICAN french cohort involved a representative sample of 4174 cancer patients and 5 years survivors. Patients reported outcomes (PROs) were collected by phone and self-questionnaire. Among the 118 NMIBC patients, the term used to define the pathology at diagnosis was prospectively evaluated. The impact on quality of life (using SF-12, EORTC-QLQ-C30 and HAD scale) and on adherence to the care protocol (endoscopic monitoring) has been assessed. RESULTS: Only 26.8% of patients reported hearing the word « Cancer ¼ at the time of NMIBC diagnosis. Conversely, 73.2% of them reported others terms, including « Tumor ¼ (22%), « Polyp ¼ (24%), and « Carcinoma ¼ (17.1%). There was no difference in terms of physical, mental quality of life and anxiety, regardless of the term used. Adherence to the follow-up endoscopic protocol was better in the group of patients hearing the word "Cancer". CONCLUSION: Three quarters of patients treated for NMIBC did not integrate the concept of « Cancer ¼ at the time of diagnosis. Quality of life and anxiety did not differ significantly depending on the term used at diagnosis. However, adherence to care protocol appears to be higher when using the word "Cancer". LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Returning to work by thyroid cancer survivors 5 years after diagnosis: the VICAN survey.

PURPOSE: Return to work (RTW) following cancer diagnosis is a challenge for both the patient and society. As thyroid cancer (TC) incidence is increasing, this study aims to assess difficulties in returning to work and income changes in TC survivors 5 years post-diagnosis. METHODS: This study belongs to the national VICAN survey conducted in France among TC patients diagnosed between January and June 2010. Data were collected through phone interviews, medical surveys and from the national medico-administrative register in 2012 and 2015. We used multivariate logistic regressions to investigate TC impact on employment and income changes. RESULTS: Of 146 patients, 121(82.9%) were women; the mean age was 42 years (SD = 8.34), 119 (81.3%) were diagnosed at an early stage, and 142(97.6%) underwent thyroidectomy. At 5 years post-diagnosis, 116 (79.7%) of the TC survivors were professionally active, 22 (15.4%) were unemployed and 8 (4.90%) were receiving disability. Among the patients employed at the time of diagnosis (n = 122), 15 (12.3%) had not returned to work 5 years post-diagnosis. Between 2 and 5 years post-diagnosis, there was no significant improvement in rates of RTW. At 5 years post-diagnosis, 90 (61.6%) reported an income decline. All TC survivors who have not returned to work were women and declared higher fatigue. Moreover, in multivariate analyses, not returning to work was associated with weight gain (OR = 8.41 (1.21; 58.23)) and working arrangements (6.90 (1.18-38.48)), while income decline was associated with comorbidities (OR = 2.28 (1.07; 4.86)) and to be engaged in manual work (OR = 2.28 (1.07; 4.88)). CONCLUSION: This study highlights that, despite a good prognostic, up to 12.3% of TC survivors had not returned to work and 61.6% reported an income decline, 5 years post-diagnosis. Weight gain, fatigue, to be a woman and working-type arrangement were associated with higher probability of not returning to work. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: TC affects a young working population. Our study identified potentially vulnerable TC survivors and important modifiable factors which may help TC survivors to be professionally active and, therefore, increase their overall quality of life.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen in young women with breast cancer: determinants of interruptions vary over time.

BACKGROUND: In premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC), 5 years of tamoxifen is recommended. Little is known about reasons for interruption in this population. The aim was to estimate the incidence of tamoxifen interruption and its correlates among younger women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a prospective cohort Elippse 40 of women with BC aged ≤ 40 diagnosed between 2005 and 2008, we studied 196 women. Tamoxifen interruption was defined as two or more consecutive months without dispensed prescription of tamoxifen, based on pharmacy refill database. Two periods were studied: between tamoxifen initiation and 16 months after BC diagnosis, and between 16 and 28 months. RESULTS: Among women treated with tamoxifen, 42% interrupted within the first 2 years of treatment. During the first period, treatment interruptions were associated with a lack of understandable information about endocrine treatment and insufficient social support. During the second period, another set of factors were associated with interruption: treatment side-effects, no longer fearing cancer relapse, lack of social support, no opportunity to ask questions at the time of diagnosis, and fewer treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Improving information and patient-provider relationship might prevent interruption. Particular attention should be paid to women with little social support.

[Pain and breast cancer among women from the ELIPPSE cohort]. / L'expérience de la douleur parmi des femmes atteintes d'un cancer du sein (cohorte ELIPPSE).

Chronic pain is one major determinant of quality of life among cancer survivors. It is especially true for breast cancer survivors, who frequently endure iatrogenic pain. We conducted in-depth interviews with 25 women recruited in the ELIPPSE cohort, 24 months after their diagnosis, and several months after the end of their treatment. These women gave various meanings to chronic pain (a transient condition, necessary for recovering, or a new and permanent condition) that contribute to 'normalize' pain and to prevent its alleviation. Moreover, health professional sometimes fuel this 'normalization' of pain. Our interviews also showed how participants enduring chronic pain tried to relieve it by adjusting their daily activities and gestures. Finally, our results emphasize both the lack of information given to patients concerning iatrogenic pain and the existing ways to manage it, and the lack of specific training for health professionals.

French hospital nurses' opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey.

BACKGROUND: Hospital nurses are frequently the first care givers to receive a patient's request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (PAS). In France, there is no consensus over which medical practices should be considered euthanasia, and this lack of consensus blurred the debate about euthanasia and PAS legalisation. This study aimed to investigate French hospital nurses' opinions towards both legalisations, including personal conceptions of euthanasia and working conditions and organisation. METHODS: A phone survey conducted among a random national sample of 1502 French hospital nurses. We studied factors associated with opinions towards euthanasia and PAS, including contextual factors related to hospital units with random-effects logistic models. RESULTS: Overall, 48% of nurses supported legalisation of euthanasia and 29%, of PAS. Religiosity, training in pallative care/pain management and feeling competent in end-of-life care were negatively correlated with support for legalisation of both euthanasia and PAS, while nurses working at night were more prone to support legalisation of both. The support for legalisation of euthanasia and PAS was also weaker in pain treatment/palliative care and intensive care units, and it was stronger in units not benefiting from interventions of charity/religious workers and in units with more nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Many French hospital nurses uphold the legalisation of euthanasia and PAS, but these nurses may be the least likely to perform what proponents of legalisation call "good" euthanasia. Improving professional knowledge of palliative care could improve the management of end-of-life situations and help to clarify the debate over euthanasia.

French district nurses' opinions towards euthanasia, involvement in end-of-life care and nurse patient relationship: a national phone survey.

OBJECTIVES: To assess French district nurses' opinions towards euthanasia and to study factors associated with these opinions, with emphasis on attitudes towards terminal patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: An anonymous telephone survey carried out in 2005 among a national random sample of French district nurses. PARTICIPANTS: District nurses currently delivering home care who have at least 1 year of professional experience. Of 803 district nurses contacted, 602 agreed to participate (response rate 75%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Opinion towards the legalisation of euthanasia (on a five-point Likert scale from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree"), attitudes towards terminal patients (discussing end-of-life issues with them, considering they should be told their prognosis, valuing the role of advance directives and surrogates). RESULTS: Overall, 65% of the 602 nurses favoured legalising euthanasia. Regarding associated factors, this proportion was higher among those who discuss end-of-life issues with terminal patients (70%), who consider competent patients should always be told their prognosis (81%) and who value the role of advance directives and surrogates in end-of-life decision-making for incompetent patients (68% and 77% respectively). Women and older nurses were less likely to favour legalising euthanasia, as were those who believed in a god who masters their destiny. CONCLUSIONS: French nurses are more in favour of legalising euthanasia than French physicians; these two populations contrast greatly in the factors associated with this support. Further research is needed to investigate how and to what extent such attitudes may affect nursing practice and emotional well-being in the specific context of end-of-life home care.

Disclosure of prognosis to terminally ill patients: attitudes and practices among French physicians.

BACKGROUND: Disclosure of the prognosis to terminally ill patients is a strong prerequisite for integrating the physical, psychological, spiritual, and social aspects of end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess French physicians' general attitudes and effective practices (with patients followed up to death recently) toward such disclosure. DESIGN/SUBJECTS: We used data from a cross-sectional survey conducted among a national sample of 917 French general practitioners, oncologists, and neurologists. RESULTS: A majority of respondents opted for prognosis disclosure only at patients' request, very few opted for systematic disclosure without patient's request, and a significant minority opted for systematic concealment. Concerning deceased patients described by respondents, 44.5% of competent patients were informed of prognosis by their physician, 27.3% were informed by someone else, 9.0% refused to be informed, and 19.2% were simply not informed. Concealment was more frequent for older patients, and physicians involved in a nongovernmental organization (NGO) for patients' support were more likely to disclose the prognosis, even without patient's request. CONCLUSIONS: Disclosure of the prognosis to terminally ill patients is still far from systematic in France. Further research is needed to better understand the motivations of French physicians' disclosure practices, which are probably culturally shaped.

Attitudes toward palliative care, conceptions of euthanasia and opinions about its legalization among French physicians.

We assume that actors of the professionalization process of palliative care make a special effort to demarcate it from euthanasia, and that such an effort has a significant impact on beliefs and attitudes toward euthanasia among the whole medical profession. We investigated concurrently attitudes toward palliative care, conceptions of euthanasia and opinion toward its legalization among a sample of 883 French general practitioners, oncologists and neurologists. We found four contrasted profiles of attitudes toward palliative care, which were closely correlated with being in touch with palliative care providers. Attitudes toward palliative care were closely correlated with beliefs about which medical practices should be labelled euthanasia, and these beliefs were in turn strongly associated with opinions toward euthanasia legalization. Our results suggest that the relationship between palliative care and euthanasia mixes semantic and strategic aspects, beyond cognitive and conative ones.

Opinions toward pain management and palliative care: comparison between HIV specialists and oncologists.

Despite the introduction of HAART, pain is still a common symptom in people living with HIV/AIDS. For these persons, pain management supplied by palliative care teams may support standard HIV care. This study compares opinions toward palliative care of 83 HIV specialists and 217 oncologists (French national survey: Palliative Care 2002). Data were collected by phone questionnaire. A cluster analysis was carried out in order to identify contrasted profiles of opinions toward palliative care. A logistic regression was performed to test the relationships between identified clusters and physicians' characteristics. With a two-cluster partition, we observed a profile corresponding to a restrictive conception of palliative care. Within this profile, physicians were more prone to consider that palliative care should be used only for terminally-ill patients, and only after all curative treatments have failed, with a restrained prescriptive power for physicians providing palliative care. This conception was associated with reluctance toward morphine analgesia. Once controlled for other physicians' characteristics, HIV specialists were more likely than oncologists to endorse this restrictive conception (OR=1.9, CI 95% [1.1; 3.3]). Thus French HIV specialists should be more informed about the utility of providing palliative care, even for patients who are not in terminal stage.

The prescription of opioid analgesics to terminal cancer patients: impact of physicians' general attitudes and contextual factors.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine factors associated with the prescription of opioid analgesics to terminal cancer patients, including physicians' general attitudes toward morphine and contextual factors. METHODS: A survey was conducted among a sample of French general practitioners (GPs) and oncologists. Respondents were asked to describe the last three terminally ill patients they had followed up to death. RESULTS: Overall, 526 GPs and oncologists (global response rate: 57%) described 1,082 cancer patients, among whom 85.4% received opioid analgesics. Among other significant predictors (patient age, cancer type, family assistance), this prescription was less frequent for female patients followed by male physicians (OR = 0.53), and more frequent for patients followed by physicians trained in palliative care (OR = 2.70). On the other hand, physicians' attitudes toward morphine were not associated with prescription of morphine and other opioid analgesics. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Although nonprescription of opioid analgesics is only a crude proxy measure for undertreatment of cancer pain, our findings suggest the need to develop training in palliative care in order to standardize practices among GPs and specialists. Our results also highlight the necessity to study pain assessment as an interaction between the physician and the patient, and to consider patients' and physicians' respective genders as a key variable within this interaction.

Post-exposure prophylaxis after occupational and non-occupational exposures to HIV: an overview of the policies implemented in 27 European countries.

The aim of this survey, which was part of an English-French project supported by the Commission of the European Communities, was to compare access to HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in the occupational and non-occupational contexts in 27 European countries. A protocol was designed in May 1998 in collaboration with all country consultants. Data were collected at country level by each consultant through interviews, review of local and national recommendations and results of national or local surveys. The final comparative analysis was carried out from the individual country reports and a review of the literature. The large majority of European countries have detailed procedures regarding occupational PEP: 20/27 have produced national guidelines, three have adopted the US CDC recommendations and only four have no official recommendations. Although no standard protocol exists, the more common one is a four-week implementation of a triple combination therapy. In the context of non-occupational exposure to HIV, only five countries have guidelines with specific recommendations and one country has adopted the CDC recommendations. In the majority of cases (13 countries), PEP is never recommended but is only available in a few circumstances, sometimes with major limitations. In the last eight countries, such PEP is not currently available. Although the estimations of HIV transmission risks in occupational and non-occupational contexts are really comparables, easy access to PEP after accidental sexual or blood exposures is not guaranteed for the general population in the majority of European countries.