RESUMO
PURPOSE: Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EMA) is characterized by eyelid myoclonia, eyelid closure sensitivity, and photosensitivity. EEG may manifest with frontal-predominant (FPEDs) or occipital-predominant epileptiform discharges (OPEDs). Data on clinical and electrographic features of these two subtypes are lacking. The purpose of our research was to look at baseline electroclinical features of EMA subtypes and to study electrographic findings of patients with EMA during intermittent photic stimulation (IPS). METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who had photoparoxysmal responses on EEGs performed at Cleveland clinic between January 01, 2012, and December 31, 2019. Patients who met diagnostic criteria for EMA were studied further. RESULTS: Of the 249 patients with photoparoxysmal responses, 70 (28.1%) had EMA (62 [88.6%] female; the mean age of epilepsy onset: 7.0 ± 7.9 years). Patients with EMA had either FPEDs or OPEDs. Eleven patients with EMA (15.7%) had seizures (4 absence, 5 myoclonic and 2 bilateral tonic-clonic) during IPS. Patients with OPEDs were more likely to have drug-resistant epilepsy; occipital focal IEDs and other focal IEDs (other than frontal/occipital) on baseline EEG; and generalized IEDs with occipital predominance, generalized IEDs with no predominance, or focal IEDs during IPS. Predictors of seizure occurrence during photic stimulation included the presence of focal occipital IEDs on baseline EEG, generalized IEDs with frontal predominance during IPS, and photoparoxysmal response outlasting the stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that EMA has two distinct subtypes, which differ in clinical characteristics, baseline EEG, and EEG during photic stimulation. We highlight diagnostic and prognostic implications of these findings. Our study also details EEG characteristics of patients with EMA during IPS.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonias(EMA) is a genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) characterized by eyelid myoclonia, eye-closure sensitivity and photosensitivity. Data on EMA patients who specifically present with photoparoxysmal response on EEG is lacking. EMA is an under-recognized syndrome which is frequently misclassified as another GGE. The main objective of our research is to describe the occurrence of EMA versus other GGEs among patients with photoparoxysmal response and evaluate their distinguishing features. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who had photoparoxysmal response on EEGs performed at Cleveland clinic between 01/01/2012 and 12/31/2019. Initial epilepsy diagnosis and clinical data were collected. EEGs were reviewed for eyelid myoclonia and eye-closure-sensitivity which were used as main diagnostic clues for EMA. If clinical criteria was met, diagnosis was revised as EMA. RESULTS: Of 249 patients with photoparoxysmal response, 70(28.1%) met EMA criteria. Sixty-two (88.6%) were females. Mean age of onset of epilepsy was 7 years (+7.9) and 120(48.2%) had other GGEs. Fifty-four (77.1%) patients with EMA were initially classified as another epilepsy. Initial diagnosis included CAE or JME in 40(57.1%) patients with EMA so we compared EMA with these syndromes. Female preponderance, drug refractoriness, older age of onset and generalized myoclonia were more common in EMA than CAE. Earlier age of onset, absence seizures, and lack of generalized myoclonic jerks were more common EMA than JME. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study demonstrates that EMA is under-recognized among GGE patients with photoparoxysmal response. It highlights distinguishing clinical and electrographic features which separate EMA from other GGEs. It emphasizes the diverse treatments utilized and the need for therapeutic options for patients with refractory EMA.
