Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico- duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying.

BACKGROUND: Data on enhanced recovery programmes after pancreatic surgery are sparse. This retrospective cohort study, using historical controls, aimed to evaluate the impact of a fast-track programme after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, 252 patients undergoing PD were treated by a fast-track programme that included earlier postoperative feeding and mobilization. The patients were compared with an equally sized control group that received a traditional programme from 2000 to 2004. Outcome measures were morbidity, length of stay and readmission rate. RESULTS: The rates of pancreatic fistula and other intra-abdominal complications were similar in the two groups. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was significantly reduced in the fast-track group (13.9 versus 24.6 per cent; P = 0.004). The independent effect of the fast-track protocol in reducing DGE was confirmed by the multiple regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio 0.477, P = 0.005). Length of stay was reduced with the fast-track protocol (median 13 versus 15 days; P < 0.001), without increasing the readmission rate (7.1 versus 6.3 per cent; P = 0.865). CONCLUSION: A fast-track programme after PD improves gastric emptying and reduces postoperative stay.

[Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a single center experience on 148 cases]. / Risultati del trapianto simultaneo di rene e pancreas: esperienza su 148 casi.

AIM: To evaluate the outcome of simultaneous pancreas transplantation (SKPT) focusing on the surgical technique applied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-eight patients were submitted to SKPT 33 with segmental pancreas with duct occlusion (from 1985 to 1990), 77 with whole pancreas with bladder diversion (from 1990 to 1998) and 38 whole pancreas with enteric diversion (29 with systemic and 9 with portal drainage) (from 1998 to December 2001). RESULTS: Patient survival was 92%, 82%, 63% at 1, 5, and 10 years respectively. Kidney survival was 87%, 75%, and 48% at 1, 5, 10 years. Pancreas graft survival was 71%, 58%, and 46% at 1, 5, 10 years. In the enteric diversion group patient, kidney, pancreas survival at one year was 93%, 92%, and 75%. A positive effect on patient survival was evident in enteric diversion versus duct occlusion group (p = 0.03), but not versus bladder diversion group and on pancreas graft survival in enteric diversion versus duct occlusion group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that SKPT has become a successful intervention for patients with type I diabetes and end stage renal disease. Reasons for these improvements include improved donor and patient selection criteria, refinements in surgical technique and better immunosuppression.